Basedash
Basedash keeps pushing its data out of the workspace — now to people without accounts
A side-by-side editorial comparison of ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus and tulpa — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Steady administrative depth for M365, punctuated by a run of serious security fixes.
M365 Manager Plus handles reporting, management, and automation for Microsoft 365 tenants from an on-premises install, shipping numbered builds that share a train with its sibling M365 Security Plus — the two carry overlapping notes at the same build numbers. Recent builds mix genuine administrative additions with security work: shared, guest, and resource mailboxes now count as free across all modules, group memberships can be assigned from template rules, and mailbox management actions became available inside automation policies. Builds 4817 and 4818 fixed a predictable-SSO-ticket CVE, a privilege escalation in delegated technician administration, and remote code execution via PowerShell embedded in CSV input.
The 0.0.x train stops at CRAN: tulpa's engine ships to the ecosystem it already anchors.
tulpa is the C++/R Bayesian spatial inference engine sitting under gcol33's family of ecological occupancy packages, tagging 0.0.x releases several times a week. 0.1.0 is its first CRAN release, and the notes state outright that the engine surface is unchanged from 0.0.198 — the work is packaging discipline: local T bindings rebound to n_t/n_times, OpenMP teams capped under R CMD check, the pkgdown deploy narrowed, an aspell dictionary added. The window behind it splits between the S3 generics conversion and numerical-correctness work in the nested-Laplace grid.
M365 Manager Plus handles reporting, management, and automation for Microsoft 365 tenants from an on-premises install, shipping numbered builds that share a train with its sibling M365 Security Plus — the two carry overlapping notes at the same build numbers. Recent builds mix genuine administrative additions with security work: shared, guest, and resource mailboxes now count as free across all modules, group memberships can be assigned from template rules, and mailbox management actions became available inside automation policies. Builds 4817 and 4818 fixed a predictable-SSO-ticket CVE, a privilege escalation in delegated technician administration, and remote code execution via PowerShell embedded in CSV input.
The product's direction is administrative depth rather than new surface — more reports, more attributes exposed to bulk operations, more management tasks reachable from automation policies rather than clicked one at a time. That is the right axis for the buyer, who is a tenant administrator doing the same operation across thousands of objects. Running underneath it is a security-hardening pass that has surfaced three distinct classes of flaw in two builds, all of them in the delegation and integration machinery that lets one console administer a whole estate.
Automation policies have absorbed mailbox tasks and template rules now drive group membership, so the next candidates are the remaining manual bulk operations — license assignment and user lifecycle actions are the ones the reports keep pointing at.
tulpa is the C++/R Bayesian spatial inference engine sitting under gcol33's family of ecological occupancy packages, tagging 0.0.x releases several times a week. 0.1.0 is its first CRAN release, and the notes state outright that the engine surface is unchanged from 0.0.198 — the work is packaging discipline: local T bindings rebound to n_t/n_times, OpenMP teams capped under R CMD check, the pkgdown deploy narrowed, an aspell dictionary added. The window behind it splits between the S3 generics conversion and numerical-correctness work in the nested-Laplace grid.
Two moves in nine days point at the same destination: the generics conversion made tulpa extensible by downstream packages, and CRAN admission makes it installable by them. The current cadence — several tags a week, some existing only to record a measurement that produced no code change — does not survive CRAN's submission overhead, so the release rhythm has to slow whether or not the project intends it. The correctness work still clusters on the joint nested-Laplace driver, and 0.1.0 extends the same diagnostics habit with .NL_AXIS_SD_REASONS, a closed vocabulary for an outer axis whose grid does not contain its own posterior mode.
Expect tulpaObs to follow tulpa onto CRAN, since it is the consumer whose registrations the engine has spent this window unblocking, and expect the version line to move in larger, less frequent steps now that each one carries a submission.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus or tulpa.
Basedash keeps pushing its data out of the workspace — now to people without accounts
RStudio ships through release branches, and the notes are commit messages
dbt Fusion's second beta is adapter work: ClickHouse gets materializations, indexes, and catalogs
Fulcrum is betting its whole map stack on Esri, with a hard Google Maps cutoff on September 1.
Holistics keeps fencing in the AI layer it spent the summer building.
Dovetail spent July opening doors to other tools and August making its own rooms easier to enter.
See all ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus alternatives → · See all tulpa alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. tulpa is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 5.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. tulpa is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 5.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/manageengine-m365-manager-plus for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top tulpa alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tulpa alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tulpa for the full list with editorial commentary on each.