Basedash
Basedash keeps pushing its data out of the workspace — now to people without accounts
A side-by-side editorial comparison of ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus and NocoDB — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Steady administrative depth for M365, punctuated by a run of serious security fixes.
M365 Manager Plus handles reporting, management, and automation for Microsoft 365 tenants from an on-premises install, shipping numbered builds that share a train with its sibling M365 Security Plus — the two carry overlapping notes at the same build numbers. Recent builds mix genuine administrative additions with security work: shared, guest, and resource mailboxes now count as free across all modules, group memberships can be assigned from template rules, and mailbox management actions became available inside automation policies. Builds 4817 and 4818 fixed a predictable-SSO-ticket CVE, a privilege escalation in delegated technician administration, and remote code execution via PowerShell embedded in CSV input.
Interfaces gets the permissions layer it needed, one release after launching.
NocoDB ships monthly, and the last two releases are a launch and its follow-through. 2026.08.0 introduced Interfaces, custom app surfaces built over a base; 2026.08.1 gives that layer what it was missing — per-dashboard visibility and editing permissions, field edit permissions enforced on interface pages, team-granted access, and page reordering. Alongside it the grid gains realtime presence with per-collaborator colours and jump-to-cursor, folders for grouping tables and views, up to three frozen fields, and nested records in List View.
M365 Manager Plus handles reporting, management, and automation for Microsoft 365 tenants from an on-premises install, shipping numbered builds that share a train with its sibling M365 Security Plus — the two carry overlapping notes at the same build numbers. Recent builds mix genuine administrative additions with security work: shared, guest, and resource mailboxes now count as free across all modules, group memberships can be assigned from template rules, and mailbox management actions became available inside automation policies. Builds 4817 and 4818 fixed a predictable-SSO-ticket CVE, a privilege escalation in delegated technician administration, and remote code execution via PowerShell embedded in CSV input.
The product's direction is administrative depth rather than new surface — more reports, more attributes exposed to bulk operations, more management tasks reachable from automation policies rather than clicked one at a time. That is the right axis for the buyer, who is a tenant administrator doing the same operation across thousands of objects. Running underneath it is a security-hardening pass that has surfaced three distinct classes of flaw in two builds, all of them in the delegation and integration machinery that lets one console administer a whole estate.
Automation policies have absorbed mailbox tasks and template rules now drive group membership, so the next candidates are the remaining manual bulk operations — license assignment and user lifecycle actions are the ones the reports keep pointing at.
NocoDB ships monthly, and the last two releases are a launch and its follow-through. 2026.08.0 introduced Interfaces, custom app surfaces built over a base; 2026.08.1 gives that layer what it was missing — per-dashboard visibility and editing permissions, field edit permissions enforced on interface pages, team-granted access, and page reordering. Alongside it the grid gains realtime presence with per-collaborator colours and jump-to-cursor, folders for grouping tables and views, up to three frozen fields, and nested records in List View.
The pattern is consistent: NocoDB launches a surface, then spends the next release making it governable and usable at team scale. Presence and folders are collaboration parity rather than new direction — the directional bet was Interfaces, and this release is that bet being made safe for the eighty people who only need to approve something. The permission system is now the same one across tables, fields, dashboards, and interface pages, which is the consolidation that makes the app layer sellable.
Write-back actions and embedding are the remaining pieces app builders expect from Interfaces, and the availability tables in each release suggest they land on the paid tier.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus or NocoDB.
Basedash keeps pushing its data out of the workspace — now to people without accounts
RStudio ships through release branches, and the notes are commit messages
dbt Fusion's second beta is adapter work: ClickHouse gets materializations, indexes, and catalogs
Fulcrum is betting its whole map stack on Esri, with a hard Google Maps cutoff on September 1.
Holistics keeps fencing in the AI layer it spent the summer building.
Dovetail spent July opening doors to other tools and August making its own rooms easier to enter.
See all ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus alternatives → · See all NocoDB alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. NocoDB is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. NocoDB is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ManageEngine M365 Manager Plus alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/manageengine-m365-manager-plus for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top NocoDB alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "NocoDB alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/nocodb for the full list with editorial commentary on each.