← Back to home
Comparison · Comms

mailcow vs Roundcube

A side-by-side editorial comparison of mailcow and Roundcube — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:self-hosted

mailcow vs Roundcube: at a glance

FeaturemailcowRoundcube
SectorCommsComms
Velocity score5.05.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmail-server, self-hosted, cve-response, xss-hardeningwebmail, php, security, oidc
Last editorial update2h ago1d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is mailcow?

Six releases, and every one of them is a security update in some form.

mailcow ships on a monthly tag with lettered revisions, and this window contains no release that isn't security-driven. The May line ran to three revisions in two weeks — an unnamed fix with a CVE identifier withheld until later, SOGo 5.12.8 covering four upstream issues, an unbound CVE, HTML escaping added to the quarantine table, sieve filter editor and queue manager. July brought Rspamd 4.1.0 and later 4.1.4, nginx 1.30.3 and a CVE fix, Postfix moved off bookworm, and a release described only as hardening.

Read the full mailcow trajectory →

What is Roundcube?

After four years, Roundcube 1.7 lands — and the release stream is otherwise all CVEs

Roundcube maintains two lines in lockstep: 1.6 as LTS and 1.7 as stable, with security fixes released to both on the same day. The vulnerability stream is heavy and varied — stored XSS via an unescaped attachment MIME type (CVE-2026-54432), a pre-auth SQL injection in the virtuser_query plugin, CSS injection through SVG animate, SSRF bypasses via local address URLs, an infinite loop in the TNEF decoder. Version 1.7.0, released in May after almost four years of development, is the only feature release in the window.

Read the full Roundcube trajectory →

mailcow vs Roundcube: editorial side-by-side

M
mailcow
COMMS
5.0

Six releases, and every one of them is a security update in some form.

◆ Current state

mailcow ships on a monthly tag with lettered revisions, and this window contains no release that isn't security-driven. The May line ran to three revisions in two weeks — an unnamed fix with a CVE identifier withheld until later, SOGo 5.12.8 covering four upstream issues, an unbound CVE, HTML escaping added to the quarantine table, sieve filter editor and queue manager. July brought Rspamd 4.1.0 and later 4.1.4, nginx 1.30.3 and a CVE fix, Postfix moved off bookworm, and a release described only as hardening.

◆ Where it's heading

Two distinct pressures are visible. One is upstream: mailcow bundles Postfix, Rspamd, SOGo, nginx, unbound and Dovecot, so every one of their advisories becomes a mailcow release, and the base image migration from bookworm to trixie is that same maintenance surfacing at the OS layer. The other is the project's own web UI, where output escaping is being retrofitted view by view — quarantine table, sieve editor, queue manager, quarantine overview — which reads as a systematic pass rather than isolated reports. Earlier releases in the feed show where feature work went when it happened: forced 2FA, ACME DNS-01 challenges, and admin controls over EAS and DAV access.

◆ Prediction

Expect the monthly-plus-revisions rhythm to continue with upstream component bumps driving most of it, and the web UI escaping pass to reach the remaining admin views.

R5.0

After four years, Roundcube 1.7 lands — and the release stream is otherwise all CVEs

◆ Current state

Roundcube maintains two lines in lockstep: 1.6 as LTS and 1.7 as stable, with security fixes released to both on the same day. The vulnerability stream is heavy and varied — stored XSS via an unescaped attachment MIME type (CVE-2026-54432), a pre-auth SQL injection in the virtuser_query plugin, CSS injection through SVG animate, SSRF bypasses via local address URLs, an infinite loop in the TNEF decoder. Version 1.7.0, released in May after almost four years of development, is the only feature release in the window.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc is a long-lived webmail codebase paying down structural risk. 1.7.0's headline changes are defensive rather than user-facing: a mandatory public_html/ entry point so installations aren't exposed by default, improved OAuth2/OIDC support including discovery and logout, removed code bloat and automated code style and quality checks. Everything since has been paired security releases across both lines, several of them reporting classes of bug — sanitizer bypasses, injection through plugin queries — that the 1.7 hardening work is aimed at. Expect the security cadence to stay high while the 1.6 LTS remains supported.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued same-day paired security releases on 1.6 and 1.7, with 1.7.x accruing incremental OIDC and sanitizer hardening before any 1.8 work becomes visible.

Alternatives to mailcow and Roundcube

Other Comms products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either mailcow or Roundcube.

See all mailcow alternatives → · See all Roundcube alternatives →

Recent activity from mailcow and Roundcube

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2d agomailcow🏖️🐮 Mooly 2026 | Postfix 3.10.12, Rspamd 4.1.0 & Nginx 1.30.3 - Revision A
  2. 19d agomailcow🏖️🐮 Mooly 2026 | Postfix 3.10.12, Rspamd 4.1.0 & Nginx 1.30.3
  3. 27d agoRoundcubeRoundcube LTS patches attachment XSS, SSRF and a TNEF loop
  4. 27d agoRoundcubeRoundcube 1.7 gets the same attachment XSS and SSRF fixes
  5. 1mo agoRoundcubeRoundcube LTS fixes a pre-auth SQL injection in virtuser_query
  6. 1mo agoRoundcubeRoundcube 1.7.1 carries the pre-auth SQL injection fixes
  7. 2mo agomailcowThird May revision: unbound CVE and nginx 1.30.2
  8. 2mo agomailcowSecond May revision: quarantine table HTML escaping
  9. 2mo agomailcowSOGo 5.12.8 covering four upstream security issues
  10. 2mo agomailcowMay base release: undisclosed CVE plus web UI escaping
  11. 2mo agoRoundcubeRoundcube Webmail 1.7.0
  12. 4mo agoRoundcubeRoundcube 1.6.15 fixes an SVG animate bypass and search regressions

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between mailcow and Roundcube?

Both compete on the same themes — self-hosted — within Comms. mailcow and Roundcube are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 5.0 vs 5.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is mailcow better than Roundcube?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. mailcow and Roundcube are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 5.0 vs 5.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Comms products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to mailcow?

Top mailcow alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mailcow alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mailcow for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Roundcube?

Top Roundcube alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Roundcube alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/roundcube for the full list with editorial commentary on each.