rnaturalearth
rnaturalearth finished its sp exit and is now optimising how the data actually arrives.
Comparison · Analytics
lubridate vs rgbif
A side-by-side editorial comparison of lubridate and rgbif — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
lubridate vs rgbif: at a glance
What is lubridate?
lubridate ships parsing fixes, timezone-data churn, and a long-overdue MIT relicense.
lubridate is R's standard package for date-time manipulation. Recent releases are dominated by parsing correctness — partial datetimes, multiple format strings, month names colliding with the %a format — and by adapting to timezone database changes in R-devel. Version 1.9.5 also relicensed the package to MIT.
What is rgbif?
rgbif is steadily pushing users off paged searching and onto real downloads.
rgbif ships several times a year and the recent releases cluster around downloads. 3.8.1 added `occ_download_sql()` for SQL-based occurrence downloads; 3.8.2 added DOI-to-download-key resolution and institutionKey downloads; 3.8.3 relayed GBIF's new throttling of bulk paging through `occ_search()` with a message pointing users at `occ_download()`; 3.8.5 added a family of `occ_download_stats_*()` functions plus multiple-taxonomy and verbatim-extension downloads. Alongside that, `name_backbone()` moved to GBIF API v2, and 3.8.0 soft-deprecated `occ_data()`.
lubridate vs rgbif: editorial side-by-side
lubridate
0.0ANALYTICS
lubridate ships parsing fixes, timezone-data churn, and a long-overdue MIT relicense.
◆ Current state
lubridate is R's standard package for date-time manipulation. Recent releases are dominated by parsing correctness — partial datetimes, multiple format strings, month names colliding with the %a format — and by adapting to timezone database changes in R-devel. Version 1.9.5 also relicensed the package to MIT.
◆ Where it's heading
The feature surface has been stable since 1.9.0 deprecated the roll argument for roll_dst and added integer coercion for Duration, Period and Interval. What continues is a steady stream of parsing edge cases and tzdata churn the package absorbs on its users' behalf, which is most of what a date-time library's maintenance actually is.
◆ Prediction
Expect further releases driven by tzdata and R-devel changes, with parsing fixes arriving as locale and format edge cases get reported.
rgbif
0.0ANALYTICS
rgbif is steadily pushing users off paged searching and onto real downloads.
◆ Current state
rgbif ships several times a year and the recent releases cluster around downloads. 3.8.1 added `occ_download_sql()` for SQL-based occurrence downloads; 3.8.2 added DOI-to-download-key resolution and institutionKey downloads; 3.8.3 relayed GBIF's new throttling of bulk paging through `occ_search()` with a message pointing users at `occ_download()`; 3.8.5 added a family of `occ_download_stats_*()` functions plus multiple-taxonomy and verbatim-extension downloads. Alongside that, `name_backbone()` moved to GBIF API v2, and 3.8.0 soft-deprecated `occ_data()`.
◆ Where it's heading
Two things are happening at once. GBIF is discouraging bulk retrieval through the search API, and rgbif is building out the download path fast enough to absorb the traffic — SQL queries, DOI round-tripping, format description, and now statistics about the downloads themselves. Metadata coverage has expanded in parallel, with a dozen `dataset_*()` functions in 3.7.9 and GRSciColl institution search in 3.8.3. The deprecations are consistent: `occ_data()`, `occ_facet()`, `occ_count(type=)` all retired in favour of narrower replacements.
◆ Prediction
The download surface is where the next additions will land — likely more SQL-download tooling and further statistics endpoints, following 3.8.1 and 3.8.5.
Alternatives to lubridate and rgbif
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either lubridate or rgbif.
writexl
writexl spent nine years refusing to do formatting, then shipped all of it in 2.0.0.
rstanarm
rstanarm is community-maintained now, tracking Stan and lme4 rather than adding models.
taxa
taxa started a ground-up rewrite in 2021 and has published almost nothing since.
rotl
rotl's whole release history is keeping name matching honest against a moving taxonomy.
taxize
taxize spends its releases absorbing other people's API changes, one dead source at a time.
See all lubridate alternatives → · See all rgbif alternatives →
Recent activity from lubridate and rgbif
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 4mo agorgbifrgbif 3.8.5 adds occurrence download statistics functions
- 6mo agolubridatelubridate 1.9.5 relicenses to MIT and fixes timestamp order
- 6mo agolubridatelubridate 1.9.4 parses partial datetimes like as.POSIXct()
- 8mo agorgbifrgbif 3.8.4 moves name matching to GBIF API v2
- 11mo agorgbifrgbif 3.8.3 adds GRSciColl search, relays GBIF paging throttle
- 1y agorgbifrgbif 3.8.2 resolves download DOIs to keys
- 1y agorgbifrgbif 3.8.1 adds SQL-based occurrence downloads ⚡
- 2y agorgbifrgbif 3.8.0 soft-deprecates occ_data(), adds download describe
- 3y agolubridatelubridate 1.9.2 fixes month parsing when %a is present
- 3y agolubridatelubridate 1.9.1 accepts multiple formats in as_datetime()
- 3y agolubridatelubridate 1.9.0 replaces roll with an explicit roll_dst argument
- 5y agolubridatelubridate 1.7.10 fixes interval division across leap years
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between lubridate and rgbif?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. lubridate and rgbif are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is lubridate better than rgbif?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. lubridate and rgbif are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to lubridate?
Top lubridate alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "lubridate alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/lubridate for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to rgbif?
Top rgbif alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rgbif alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rgbif for the full list with editorial commentary on each.