← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

logbin vs tectonicr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of logbin and tectonicr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

logbin vs tectonicr: at a glance

Featurelogbintectonicr
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesrelative-risk, log-binomial, glm-compatibility, em-algorithmgeophysics, stress-field, circular-statistics, plate-tectonics
Last editorial update58m ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is logbin?

Relative-risk regression that converges where glm fails, under an unreadable tag order

logbin fits log-binomial models to estimate relative risk, a fit standard glm frequently fails to converge on because of the constrained parameter space. Its answer is a choice of algorithms — adaptive barrier, combinatorial EM, and expectation-maximisation on an overparameterised model — selected through a method argument and optionally accelerated with turboEM. The most recent release, in April 2025, replaces the variance-covariance calculation in summary.logbin so it matches summary.glm, and adds a testthat suite.

Read the full logbin trajectory →

What is tectonicr?

Stress-field analysis tracks the 2025 World Stress Map and keeps adding plotting shortcuts.

tectonicr analyses the orientation of maximum horizontal stress, comparing observed azimuths against those predicted by plate motion in a plate-of-rotation reference frame. Version 0.4.7 added support for the 2025 World Stress Map release and made the version selectable at download; 0.4.8 followed with new summary statistics for axial data, ggplot2 geoms for plotting directions, and a faster kappa estimator.

Read the full tectonicr trajectory →

logbin vs tectonicr: editorial side-by-side

L
logbin
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Relative-risk regression that converges where glm fails, under an unreadable tag order

◆ Current state

logbin fits log-binomial models to estimate relative risk, a fit standard glm frequently fails to converge on because of the constrained parameter space. Its answer is a choice of algorithms — adaptive barrier, combinatorial EM, and expectation-maximisation on an overparameterised model — selected through a method argument and optionally accelerated with turboEM. The most recent release, in April 2025, replaces the variance-covariance calculation in summary.logbin so it matches summary.glm, and adds a testthat suite.

◆ Where it's heading

The method work concluded in 2021 and the package has since been aligned with base R conventions rather than extended: the vcov calculation now mirrors glm's, and earlier releases added the contrasts, qr, R and effects components so standard glm S3 methods such as influence() and plot() work on logbin objects. Be warned that the feed's tag order is unusable — versions 2.0, 2.0.1, 2.0.2 and 2.0.4 were all pushed within ninety seconds on 23 July 2021 in non-monotonic order, while 2.0.3 carries a 2017 timestamp and restates 2.0.2's notes. Read the bodies, not the sequence.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued alignment with glm conventions and occasional CRAN maintenance; the algorithm set has been stable for four years and nothing in these entries suggests another is planned.

T
tectonicr
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Stress-field analysis tracks the 2025 World Stress Map and keeps adding plotting shortcuts.

◆ Current state

tectonicr analyses the orientation of maximum horizontal stress, comparing observed azimuths against those predicted by plate motion in a plate-of-rotation reference frame. Version 0.4.7 added support for the 2025 World Stress Map release and made the version selectable at download; 0.4.8 followed with new summary statistics for axial data, ggplot2 geoms for plotting directions, and a faster kappa estimator.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is maturing along two axes at once. On the statistics side the circular methods keep getting corrected and accelerated, with a major fix to est.kappa() for doubling angles before treating them as directional data and a faster approximation replacing the maximum likelihood path by default. On the usability side the additions are convenience wrappers, data2PoR() and the geom_azimuth pair, which is what a package does once its core methods stop moving. A sign convention for deviation was also flipped, which quietly changes existing results.

◆ Prediction

Expect the convenience layer to keep growing around a stable core, and the next substantive release to track whatever the World Stress Map publishes after 2025.

Alternatives to logbin and tectonicr

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either logbin or tectonicr.

See all logbin alternatives → · See all tectonicr alternatives →

Recent activity from logbin and tectonicr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 8mo agotectonicrggplot2 azimuth geoms and axial summary statistics added
  2. 1y agotectonicrWorld Stress Map 2025 supported with selectable version
  3. 1y agologbinvcov in summary.logbin now matches summary.glm
  4. 1y agotectonicrSpatial interpolation performance improved
  5. 2y agotectonicrWeighting powers added to spatial interpolation
  6. 2y agotectonicrBootstrap dispersion statistics ahead of CRAN submission
  7. 5y agologbinFactor reparameterisation fix and faster parameter expansion
  8. 5y agologbinVersion bump to satisfy a CRAN check
  9. 5y agologbinmethod and accelerate options: adaptive barrier, CEM, EM, turboEM
  10. 5y agologbinglm S3 method support via contrasts, qr, R and effects components
  11. 5y agologbinJournal of Statistical Software citation added

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between logbin and tectonicr?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. logbin and tectonicr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is logbin better than tectonicr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. logbin and tectonicr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to logbin?

Top logbin alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "logbin alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/logbin for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tectonicr?

Top tectonicr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tectonicr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tectonicr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.