← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

logbin vs PowerTOST

A side-by-side editorial comparison of logbin and PowerTOST — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

logbin vs PowerTOST: at a glance

FeaturelogbinPowerTOST
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesrelative-risk, log-binomial, glm-compatibility, em-algorithmbioequivalence, sample-size, regulatory, pharmacometrics
Last editorial update2h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is logbin?

Relative-risk regression that converges where glm fails, under an unreadable tag order

logbin fits log-binomial models to estimate relative risk, a fit standard glm frequently fails to converge on because of the constrained parameter space. Its answer is a choice of algorithms — adaptive barrier, combinatorial EM, and expectation-maximisation on an overparameterised model — selected through a method argument and optionally accelerated with turboEM. The most recent release, in April 2025, replaces the variance-covariance calculation in summary.logbin so it matches summary.glm, and adds a testthat suite.

Read the full logbin trajectory →

What is PowerTOST?

A bioequivalence sample-size workhorse whose news is which regulator it now covers

PowerTOST computes power and sample size for bioequivalence and its changelog reads as a record of regulatory divergence more than statistical development. Version 1.5-3 added the Gulf Co-operation Council as a regulator setting; 1.5-4 and 1.5-6 stripped 'FDA' out of the narrow-therapeutic-index function names once China's CDE began requiring the same evaluation. The most recent release, 1.5-7, is a single fix to how nvec() splits a total sample size across sequences.

Read the full PowerTOST trajectory →

logbin vs PowerTOST: editorial side-by-side

L
logbin
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Relative-risk regression that converges where glm fails, under an unreadable tag order

◆ Current state

logbin fits log-binomial models to estimate relative risk, a fit standard glm frequently fails to converge on because of the constrained parameter space. Its answer is a choice of algorithms — adaptive barrier, combinatorial EM, and expectation-maximisation on an overparameterised model — selected through a method argument and optionally accelerated with turboEM. The most recent release, in April 2025, replaces the variance-covariance calculation in summary.logbin so it matches summary.glm, and adds a testthat suite.

◆ Where it's heading

The method work concluded in 2021 and the package has since been aligned with base R conventions rather than extended: the vcov calculation now mirrors glm's, and earlier releases added the contrasts, qr, R and effects components so standard glm S3 methods such as influence() and plot() work on logbin objects. Be warned that the feed's tag order is unusable — versions 2.0, 2.0.1, 2.0.2 and 2.0.4 were all pushed within ninety seconds on 23 July 2021 in non-monotonic order, while 2.0.3 carries a 2017 timestamp and restates 2.0.2's notes. Read the bodies, not the sequence.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued alignment with glm conventions and occasional CRAN maintenance; the algorithm set has been stable for four years and nothing in these entries suggests another is planned.

P
PowerTOST
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A bioequivalence sample-size workhorse whose news is which regulator it now covers

◆ Current state

PowerTOST computes power and sample size for bioequivalence and its changelog reads as a record of regulatory divergence more than statistical development. Version 1.5-3 added the Gulf Co-operation Council as a regulator setting; 1.5-4 and 1.5-6 stripped 'FDA' out of the narrow-therapeutic-index function names once China's CDE began requiring the same evaluation. The most recent release, 1.5-7, is a single fix to how nvec() splits a total sample size across sequences.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is in long maintenance with a widening regulatory surface: the statistical methods are settled, and releases arrive when an agency publishes a framework that can be expressed as a settings variant of an existing method. Function naming has been deliberately decoupled from any single agency, with the deprecated FDA-suffixed aliases carried for years before removal. Cadence has slowed to roughly one release every eighteen months.

◆ Prediction

The next release is most likely another regulator setting or a small fix; on the deprecation notice already given, the power.NTIDFDA()-style aliases are the obvious removal candidate.

Alternatives to logbin and PowerTOST

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either logbin or PowerTOST.

See all logbin alternatives → · See all PowerTOST alternatives →

Recent activity from logbin and PowerTOST

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 10mo agoPowerTOSTFix for splitting total sample size across sequences
  2. 1y agologbinvcov in summary.logbin now matches summary.glm
  3. 2y agoPowerTOSTNTID functions renamed off the FDA acronym; GCC guidance in vignettes
  4. 4y agoPowerTOSTpower.NTID() aliases added; FDA-suffixed names deprecated
  5. 5y agologbinFactor reparameterisation fix and faster parameter expansion
  6. 5y agologbinVersion bump to satisfy a CRAN check
  7. 5y agologbinmethod and accelerate options: adaptive barrier, CEM, EM, turboEM
  8. 5y agologbinglm S3 method support via contrasts, qr, R and effects components
  9. 5y agologbinJournal of Statistical Software citation added
  10. 5y agoPowerTOSTGulf Co-operation Council added as a regulator setting
  11. 5y agoPowerTOSTMaintenance release with vignette and documentation clarifications
  12. 5y agoPowerTOSTstringsAsFactors fix for older R in a vignette example

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between logbin and PowerTOST?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. logbin and PowerTOST are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is logbin better than PowerTOST?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. logbin and PowerTOST are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to logbin?

Top logbin alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "logbin alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/logbin for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to PowerTOST?

Top PowerTOST alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "PowerTOST alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/powertost for the full list with editorial commentary on each.