← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

lime vs osmapiR

A side-by-side editorial comparison of lime and osmapiR — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

lime vs osmapiR: at a glance

FeaturelimeosmapiR
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesexplainability, machine-learning, maintenance-mode, r-packagesopenstreetmap, api-client, r-language, geospatial
Last editorial update50m ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is lime?

The R port of LIME has shipped one commit in three years, and it was an xgboost compatibility patch

lime is the R implementation of local interpretable model-agnostic explanations, and it is effectively in preservation rather than development. Its last substantive feature release was 0.5.0 in 2019; 0.5.3 in 2022 recorded a maintainer handover and general upkeep; 0.5.4 in December 2025 exists solely to keep the package working across xgboost versions. Six releases span eight years, and only two of them contain features.

Read the full lime trajectory →

What is osmapiR?

osmapiR is the rare API client that tracks its server's wiki revision numbers in the changelog.

osmapiR wraps the full OpenStreetMap API from R — reading and writing map data, changesets, notes, GPX traces and user records — with OAuth2 where the endpoint requires it, pagination handled internally, and atomic calls vectorised. Recent releases have filled in the moderation and social surface: note subscription, user blocks, changeset discussion search. The newest release lets `bbox` arguments arrive as a character string, matrix, vector, an sf `bbox`, or a terra `SpatExtent`.

Read the full osmapiR trajectory →

lime vs osmapiR: editorial side-by-side

L
lime
ANALYTICS
0.0

The R port of LIME has shipped one commit in three years, and it was an xgboost compatibility patch

◆ Current state

lime is the R implementation of local interpretable model-agnostic explanations, and it is effectively in preservation rather than development. Its last substantive feature release was 0.5.0 in 2019; 0.5.3 in 2022 recorded a maintainer handover and general upkeep; 0.5.4 in December 2025 exists solely to keep the package working across xgboost versions. Six releases span eight years, and only two of them contain features.

◆ Where it's heading

The pattern is upstream-driven survival: every release since 0.5.0 responds to a change in something lime depends on — glmnet's namespace, order() semantics on data frames, xgboost's interface. The one deliberate change in that stretch was moving htmlwidgets, shiny and shinythemes to Suggests, which lightens installation for the majority of users who never open the interactive explainer. Nothing in the feed indicates work on the explanation method itself.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release, whenever it comes, to be another compatibility patch triggered by a dependency change rather than anything touching how explanations are computed. The three-year gaps make timing unpredictable.

O
osmapiR
ANALYTICS
0.0

osmapiR is the rare API client that tracks its server's wiki revision numbers in the changelog.

◆ Current state

osmapiR wraps the full OpenStreetMap API from R — reading and writing map data, changesets, notes, GPX traces and user records — with OAuth2 where the endpoint requires it, pagination handled internally, and atomic calls vectorised. Recent releases have filled in the moderation and social surface: note subscription, user blocks, changeset discussion search. The newest release lets `bbox` arguments arrive as a character string, matrix, vector, an sf `bbox`, or a terra `SpatExtent`.

◆ Where it's heading

Four consecutive releases open with the same line — documentation and code updated for server-side changes, cited by OSM wiki revision range. That is a maintainer treating an evolving remote API as a versioned contract and auditing against it each cycle, which is unusual discipline and the main reason to trust this client over a hand-rolled wrapper. The second thread is fitting into R's spatial conventions rather than exposing OSM's, visible in the bbox coercion work and the httr2 upgrades landing with upstream help.

◆ Prediction

The pattern is stable enough to call: another release synchronised to the next OSM wiki revision range, adding whatever endpoints appeared and adjusting whatever changed shape.

Alternatives to lime and osmapiR

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either lime or osmapiR.

See all lime alternatives → · See all osmapiR alternatives →

Recent activity from lime and osmapiR

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 5mo agoosmapiRbbox arguments accept sf and terra objects
  2. 8mo agolimexgboost compatibility restored across versions
  3. 0y agoosmapiRNote search defaults to creation order; JSON for GPX metadata
  4. 1y agoosmapiRNote subscriptions and user block endpoints added
  5. 1y agoosmapiRChangeset queries gain from and to parameters
  6. 1y agoosmapiRJOSS citation added; single-tag conversion fixed
  7. 2y agoosmapiRComplete OSM API coverage arrives in one release
  8. 3y agolimeMaintainer handover and general upkeep
  9. 5y agolimeShiny dependencies moved to Suggests
  10. 6y agolimeNamespace fix for glmnet changes
  11. 7y agolimegower_pow added and lambda aligned with the Python implementation
  12. 8y agolimeh2o support, NA handling, and date columns held during permutation

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between lime and osmapiR?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. lime and osmapiR are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is lime better than osmapiR?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. lime and osmapiR are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to lime?

Top lime alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "lime alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/lime for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to osmapiR?

Top osmapiR alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "osmapiR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/osmapir for the full list with editorial commentary on each.