← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

lime vs r2rtf

A side-by-side editorial comparison of lime and r2rtf — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

lime vs r2rtf: at a glance

Featurelimer2rtf
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesexplainability, machine-learning, maintenance-mode, r-packagesclinical-reporting, rtf, internationalization, document-conversion
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is lime?

The R port of LIME has shipped one commit in three years, and it was an xgboost compatibility patch

lime is the R implementation of local interpretable model-agnostic explanations, and it is effectively in preservation rather than development. Its last substantive feature release was 0.5.0 in 2019; 0.5.3 in 2022 recorded a maintainer handover and general upkeep; 0.5.4 in December 2025 exists solely to keep the package working across xgboost versions. Six releases span eight years, and only two of them contain features.

Read the full lime trajectory →

What is r2rtf?

The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely

r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.

Read the full r2rtf trajectory →

lime vs r2rtf: editorial side-by-side

L
lime
ANALYTICS
0.0

The R port of LIME has shipped one commit in three years, and it was an xgboost compatibility patch

◆ Current state

lime is the R implementation of local interpretable model-agnostic explanations, and it is effectively in preservation rather than development. Its last substantive feature release was 0.5.0 in 2019; 0.5.3 in 2022 recorded a maintainer handover and general upkeep; 0.5.4 in December 2025 exists solely to keep the package working across xgboost versions. Six releases span eight years, and only two of them contain features.

◆ Where it's heading

The pattern is upstream-driven survival: every release since 0.5.0 responds to a change in something lime depends on — glmnet's namespace, order() semantics on data frames, xgboost's interface. The one deliberate change in that stretch was moving htmlwidgets, shiny and shinythemes to Suggests, which lightens installation for the majority of users who never open the interactive explainer. Nothing in the feed indicates work on the explanation method itself.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release, whenever it comes, to be another compatibility patch triggered by a dependency change rather than anything touching how explanations are computed. The three-year gaps make timing unpredictable.

R
r2rtf
ANALYTICS
0.0

The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely

◆ Current state

r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run through the window. One is output reach: RTF remains the composition target, but the artifacts that come out of it now include DOCX and HTML, and page numbering can be made table-relative across multi-page tables. The other is durability under a moving R and font stack — the ANSI/Unicode converter was rebuilt, the LaTeX mapping table generated from code rather than shipped as sysdata, unlist() usage fixed for R 4.5, and graphics-device leaks that produced stray Rplots.pdf closed off.

◆ Prediction

Having exported DOCX and HTML conversion, the likely next step is filling in what those formats lose relative to RTF — pagination and footnote fidelity are the obvious gaps. The i18n path currently covers Chinese only, so additional font families are the other plausible direction.

Alternatives to lime and r2rtf

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either lime or r2rtf.

See all lime alternatives → · See all r2rtf alternatives →

Recent activity from lime and r2rtf

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 7mo agor2rtfDOCX and HTML output become exported functions
  2. 8mo agolimexgboost compatibility restored across versions
  3. 11mo agor2rtfChinese character support arrives via an i18n font path
  4. 1y agor2rtfText colour fixed for figures encoded into RTF
  5. 1y agor2rtfFootnote handling fixed for R 4.5.0
  6. 1y agor2rtfUnicode converter rebuilt and mapping table made inspectable
  7. 2y agor2rtfUTF-8 conversion fix and LibreOffice 7.6 support
  8. 3y agolimeMaintainer handover and general upkeep
  9. 5y agolimeShiny dependencies moved to Suggests
  10. 6y agolimeNamespace fix for glmnet changes
  11. 7y agolimegower_pow added and lambda aligned with the Python implementation
  12. 8y agolimeh2o support, NA handling, and date columns held during permutation

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between lime and r2rtf?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. lime and r2rtf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is lime better than r2rtf?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. lime and r2rtf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to lime?

Top lime alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "lime alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/lime for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to r2rtf?

Top r2rtf alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "r2rtf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/r2rtf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.