← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

lares vs selection.index

A side-by-side editorial comparison of lares and selection.index — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

lares vs selection.index: at a glance

Featurelaresselection.index
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmarketing-mix-modeling, robyn, utility-toolbox, api-compatibilityplant-breeding, selection-index, genomic-selection, rcpp
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is lares?

One analyst's toolbox, still shipping: Meta MMM tooling beside Wordle solvers

lares is Bernardo Lares' personal R sidekick and has never pretended otherwise — the same release adds a marketing-mix diagnostic and a function to keep your screen awake. The serious core is the Robyn/Meta arm: model selection, per-channel performance decomposition, cross-channel budget allocation. Around it sit h2o AutoML wrappers, credential and cache helpers, MP3 tagging, and a family of games.

Read the full lares trajectory →

What is selection.index?

A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite

selection.index computes selection indices for plant breeding — weighting several traits into one number breeders can rank on. After two years of silence it shipped 2.0.0 in March 2026, and the package is barely recognisable: snake_case throughout, an Rcpp and RcppEigen computational core, and index families for genomic data, marker data, multi-stage trials and constrained genetic gain sitting beside the original phenotypic ones.

Read the full selection.index trajectory →

lares vs selection.index: editorial side-by-side

L
lares
INFRA · APIS
0.0

One analyst's toolbox, still shipping: Meta MMM tooling beside Wordle solvers

◆ Current state

lares is Bernardo Lares' personal R sidekick and has never pretended otherwise — the same release adds a marketing-mix diagnostic and a function to keep your screen awake. The serious core is the Robyn/Meta arm: model selection, per-channel performance decomposition, cross-channel budget allocation. Around it sit h2o AutoML wrappers, credential and cache helpers, MP3 tagging, and a family of games.

◆ Where it's heading

Over two years the Robyn tooling matured first — robyn_performance() and robyn_modelselector() were rebuilt release after release through 2024 — and recent work has drifted outward into media and API plumbing: encrypted file helpers in 5.3.2, then an iTunes-first metadata path, MP3 tag writing, and a move of holidays() onto the Nager.Date API in 5.4.0. Cadence is roughly quarterly and the package has been quiet for three months.

◆ Prediction

The pattern in nearly every release is that a third-party API moves and lares follows it — Meta's version bumps, Robyn 3.12.0, now Nager.Date. Expect the next release to be another compatibility pass plus whatever utility the author needed that week; nothing in these entries points at a structural change.

S
selection.index
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite

◆ Current state

selection.index computes selection indices for plant breeding — weighting several traits into one number breeders can rank on. After two years of silence it shipped 2.0.0 in March 2026, and the package is barely recognisable: snake_case throughout, an Rcpp and RcppEigen computational core, and index families for genomic data, marker data, multi-stage trials and constrained genetic gain sitting beside the original phenotypic ones.

◆ Where it's heading

The first version series added one function at a time — combinatorial indices, then genetic advance, then mean performance under randomised block designs — against a fixed phenotypic framing. Version 2.0.0 abandons that framing rather than extending it. Genomic and marker information become inputs the package understands, multi-cycle simulation becomes a built-in toolset, and the old combinatorial entry points are replaced by a named lpsi(). The 2.0.1 follow-up is entirely CI and numerical-stability work, which reads like a maintainer bracing a much larger surface.

◆ Prediction

A seventeen-runner CI matrix mirroring every CRAN check flavour, added days after 2.0.0, says the immediate concern is keeping a compiled multi-family package green rather than adding to it. Expect stabilisation releases before anything new.

Alternatives to lares and selection.index

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either lares or selection.index.

See all lares alternatives → · See all selection.index alternatives →

Recent activity from lares and selection.index

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agolaresNager.Date holidays, MP3 tag writing, named h2o models
  2. 5mo agoselection.indexCI expanded to 17 runners after the 2.0.0 rewrite
  3. 5mo agoselection.indexGenomic, marker and multi-stage selection indices on an Rcpp core
  4. 6mo agoselection.indexUnspecified general performance improvements
  5. 11mo agolaresEncrypted file helpers join the credential tooling
  6. 1y agolaresggplot2 4.0 readiness and Meta API v21
  7. 1y agolaresMarginal CPA inverted and multi-model performance fixed
  8. 1y agolaresCertainty and cluster-spread metrics for model selection
  9. 1y agolaresCross-channel budget allocation across several models
  10. 2y agoselection.indexMean performance for randomised block designs
  11. 3y agoselection.indexsel.index() and sel.score.rank() removed for comb.indices()
  12. 4y agoselection.indexGenetic advance calculation added

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between lares and selection.index?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. lares and selection.index are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is lares better than selection.index?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. lares and selection.index are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to lares?

Top lares alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "lares alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/lares for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to selection.index?

Top selection.index alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "selection.index alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/selection-index for the full list with editorial commentary on each.