← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

L1centrality vs sps

A side-by-side editorial comparison of L1centrality and sps — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

L1centrality vs sps: at a glance

FeatureL1centralitysps
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesgraph-analysis, centrality, r-package, visualizationr-package, survey-sampling, sequential-poisson, performance
Last editorial update56m ago1d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is L1centrality?

A graph-centrality package that spent 2026 making its existing measures usable at scale, then went quiet.

L1centrality implements L1 centrality and prestige for graphs, including group, local, and neighbourhood variants plus MDS-based visualization. The measure set has been stable since 0.3.0; the work since has gone into interfaces around it — S3 classes with print and summary methods, plot methods for every result class, and in 0.5.0 both multi-group evaluation and multicore computation for the local variant. The two releases since have been a warning-message pass and a typo pass.

Read the full L1centrality trajectory →

What is sps?

sps keeps sanding down sequential Poisson sampling rather than adding to it.

The package implements sequential Poisson sampling for survey design, covering inclusion probabilities, proportional allocation, replicate weights, and take-all strata. Recent releases are small and tightly scoped: a divisor method helper, an iterator that draws a sample one unit at a time, automatic selection of the replicate-weight parameter, and repeated performance work on inclusion probability calculation.

Read the full sps trajectory →

L1centrality vs sps: editorial side-by-side

L
L1centrality
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A graph-centrality package that spent 2026 making its existing measures usable at scale, then went quiet.

◆ Current state

L1centrality implements L1 centrality and prestige for graphs, including group, local, and neighbourhood variants plus MDS-based visualization. The measure set has been stable since 0.3.0; the work since has gone into interfaces around it — S3 classes with print and summary methods, plot methods for every result class, and in 0.5.0 both multi-group evaluation and multicore computation for the local variant. The two releases since have been a warning-message pass and a typo pass.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has moved from defining measures to operationalizing them. 0.5.0 was the inflection: parallel local computation and list-valued group input both target users running these measures over many vertex sets or large graphs rather than illustrating them on one. The same release renamed weight_transform and eta to edge_weight_transform and vertex_weight, and added an explicit message when a distance matrix is received — the signature of a maintainer fielding the same misuse repeatedly.

◆ Prediction

The last two releases carry no functional change, so the near-term path is maintenance rather than new measures; a 0.6.0 would most likely extend parallelism beyond L1centLOC to the other computationally heavy variants.

S
sps
INFRA · APIS
2.5

sps keeps sanding down sequential Poisson sampling rather than adding to it.

◆ Current state

The package implements sequential Poisson sampling for survey design, covering inclusion probabilities, proportional allocation, replicate weights, and take-all strata. Recent releases are small and tightly scoped: a divisor method helper, an iterator that draws a sample one unit at a time, automatic selection of the replicate-weight parameter, and repeated performance work on inclusion probability calculation.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is consolidation rather than expansion. Most releases either speed up an existing routine or remove a decision the user previously had to make by hand, such as picking the smallest parameter that keeps replicate weights non-negative. Documentation and tooling get comparable attention to the algorithms, with a dedicated vignette on inclusion probabilities and a recent switch of test and documentation infrastructure. The API surface has been essentially stable across the window.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued small ergonomic and performance releases against the existing function set rather than new sampling designs, which is the pattern every release in this window follows.

Alternatives to L1centrality and sps

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either L1centrality or sps.

See all L1centrality alternatives → · See all sps alternatives →

Recent activity from L1centrality and sps

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agospsDocumentation polish; switches to tinytest and litedown
  2. 1mo agoL1centralityTypo fixes only
  3. 3mo agoL1centralityWarning message wording updated
  4. 3mo agoL1centralityMulti-group prominence and multicore local centrality
  5. 9mo agospsFixes extra argument handling in sps_iterator()
  6. 9mo agoL1centralityPlot methods for every result class, plus edge-weight transforms
  7. 0y agospsAdds divisor_method() and a one-unit-at-a-time sampling iterator
  8. 1y agospsAdds an inclusion-probability vignette and faster partial sorting
  9. 1y agospsAutomatic tau selection for replicate weights
  10. 1y agoL1centralityHandles unnamed vertices; quantile type pinned
  11. 1y agoL1centralityS3 classes for all results, plus a Gini coefficient
  12. 2y agospsAdds becomes_ta() for take-all stratum sample sizes

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between L1centrality and sps?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. sps is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is L1centrality better than sps?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. sps is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to L1centrality?

Top L1centrality alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "L1centrality alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/l1centrality for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to sps?

Top sps alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "sps alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/sps for the full list with editorial commentary on each.