← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

forestploter vs sps

A side-by-side editorial comparison of forestploter and sps — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

forestploter vs sps: at a glance

Featureforestplotersps
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesdata-visualization, clinical-trials, forest-plots, meta-analysisr-package, survey-sampling, sequential-poisson, performance
Last editorial update1h ago1d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is forestploter?

A forest plot package that keeps handing users control of one more graphical detail.

forestploter draws forest plots where the layout is driven by the data frame itself, so text columns and confidence intervals sit in the same grid. The theme function has become the package's centre of gravity: it now controls graphical parameters for titles, legends, axis, arrow labels, footnotes, and reference lines, with multi-column and row-order legend controls added most recently. Two releases shipped nine minutes apart in April 2026 after a two-year gap, deprecating some theme parameters, removing inter-cell gaps, and improving tick breaks.

Read the full forestploter trajectory →

What is sps?

sps keeps sanding down sequential Poisson sampling rather than adding to it.

The package implements sequential Poisson sampling for survey design, covering inclusion probabilities, proportional allocation, replicate weights, and take-all strata. Recent releases are small and tightly scoped: a divisor method helper, an iterator that draws a sample one unit at a time, automatic selection of the replicate-weight parameter, and repeated performance work on inclusion probability calculation.

Read the full sps trajectory →

forestploter vs sps: editorial side-by-side

F
forestploter
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A forest plot package that keeps handing users control of one more graphical detail.

◆ Current state

forestploter draws forest plots where the layout is driven by the data frame itself, so text columns and confidence intervals sit in the same grid. The theme function has become the package's centre of gravity: it now controls graphical parameters for titles, legends, axis, arrow labels, footnotes, and reference lines, with multi-column and row-order legend controls added most recently. Two releases shipped nine minutes apart in April 2026 after a two-year gap, deprecating some theme parameters, removing inter-cell gaps, and improving tick breaks.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction has been consistent for four years: whatever a user might want to restyle eventually becomes an argument. Point size stopped being transformed, cell height adjustment was removed as unwanted, legends gained size, column, and fill-order control, and vertical lines learned to extend the full plot height and to draw beneath the whiskers. The one structural move was 1.1.0, which let callers supply their own confidence-interval and summary drawing functions — turning a fixed renderer into an extensible one. Everything since has been the arguments that extensibility did not cover.

◆ Prediction

The latest release deprecates theme parameters rather than adding them, which suggests the next one consolidates the theme surface that has grown for four years rather than extending it further.

S
sps
INFRA · APIS
2.5

sps keeps sanding down sequential Poisson sampling rather than adding to it.

◆ Current state

The package implements sequential Poisson sampling for survey design, covering inclusion probabilities, proportional allocation, replicate weights, and take-all strata. Recent releases are small and tightly scoped: a divisor method helper, an iterator that draws a sample one unit at a time, automatic selection of the replicate-weight parameter, and repeated performance work on inclusion probability calculation.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is consolidation rather than expansion. Most releases either speed up an existing routine or remove a decision the user previously had to make by hand, such as picking the smallest parameter that keeps replicate weights non-negative. Documentation and tooling get comparable attention to the algorithms, with a dedicated vignette on inclusion probabilities and a recent switch of test and documentation infrastructure. The API surface has been essentially stable across the window.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued small ergonomic and performance releases against the existing function set rather than new sampling designs, which is the pattern every release in this window follows.

Alternatives to forestploter and sps

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either forestploter or sps.

See all forestploter alternatives → · See all sps alternatives →

Recent activity from forestploter and sps

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agospsDocumentation polish; switches to tinytest and litedown
  2. 3mo agoforestploterTheme parameters deprecated; cell gaps removed, ticks improved
  3. 3mo agoforestploterMulti-column legends and full-height vertical lines
  4. 9mo agospsFixes extra argument handling in sps_iterator()
  5. 0y agospsAdds divisor_method() and a one-unit-at-a-time sampling iterator
  6. 1y agospsAdds an inclusion-probability vignette and faster partial sorting
  7. 1y agospsAutomatic tau selection for replicate weights
  8. 2y agoforestploterFull graphical control over titles, legends, axis and footnotes
  9. 2y agospsAdds becomes_ta() for take-all stratum sample sizes
  10. 2y agoforestploterTick digit calculation improved; automatic cell height removed
  11. 3y agoforestploterCustom CI and summary drawing functions; boxplots inside the plot
  12. 3y agoforestploterArbitrary grobs and math symbols can be placed in cells

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between forestploter and sps?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. sps is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is forestploter better than sps?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. sps is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to forestploter?

Top forestploter alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "forestploter alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/forestploter for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to sps?

Top sps alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "sps alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/sps for the full list with editorial commentary on each.