← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

KLINK vs qqman

A side-by-side editorial comparison of KLINK and qqman — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

KLINK vs qqman: at a glance

FeatureKLINKqqman
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesforensic-genetics, kinship-testing, str-markers, shinygwas, genomics, manhattan-plot, visualization
Last editorial update48m ago14h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is KLINK?

Forensic kinship testing with linked STR markers, now peer-reviewed and taking data from anywhere.

KLINK is a Shiny application and R package for kinship testing that accounts for linkage between STR markers, rather than treating all markers as independent. The built-in genetic map covers 50 common STR markers, pairs them dynamically after data loads, and lets the user set the maximum distance at which a pair counts as linked. Custom marker maps can now arrive as Excel files including KLINK's own download files, and a paper describing the tool was published in FSI:Genetics in 2026.

Read the full KLINK trajectory →

What is qqman?

The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.

qqman does two things: manhattan() and qq() plots for genome-wide association study results. Its six visible releases run from 2014 to a single 2017 packaging fix, and the last release with any user-facing change shipped in 2015. The archive is non-monotonic — a 0.0.0 tag published after 0.1.1 archives the pre-package standalone script — so version order and publication order disagree.

Read the full qqman trajectory →

KLINK vs qqman: editorial side-by-side

K
KLINK
ANALYTICS
2.5

Forensic kinship testing with linked STR markers, now peer-reviewed and taking data from anywhere.

◆ Current state

KLINK is a Shiny application and R package for kinship testing that accounts for linkage between STR markers, rather than treating all markers as independent. The built-in genetic map covers 50 common STR markers, pairs them dynamically after data loads, and lets the user set the maximum distance at which a pair counts as linked. Custom marker maps can now arrive as Excel files including KLINK's own download files, and a paper describing the tool was published in FSI:Genetics in 2026.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is from fixed panel toward general instrument. Hard-coded linkage pairs gave way to dynamic pairing, the built-in map grew from 18 to 50 markers, the map itself was then moved out to the norSTR package, and the app now accepts custom maps in several file formats and decimal conventions. Method capability tracks the upstream pedsuite rather than KLINK itself: special lumping in pedprobr and pedmut is what allowed complex mutation models in common pedigrees, and the newest release pins pedtools 2.11.0 and pedprobr 1.1.0 for faster likelihoods and better handling of looped pedigrees. Much of the remaining work is unglamorous casework ergonomics, replacing stray Norwegian text in Excel output, controlling table heights, fixing karyogram colours.

◆ Prediction

With the map externalised and custom maps loading from multiple formats, the likeliest next step is broader marker-panel coverage through norSTR rather than changes in KLINK itself. Method gains should continue to arrive as pedprobr and pedmut version bumps.

Q
qqman
ANALYTICS
0.0

The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.

◆ Current state

qqman does two things: manhattan() and qq() plots for genome-wide association study results. Its six visible releases run from 2014 to a single 2017 packaging fix, and the last release with any user-facing change shipped in 2015. The archive is non-monotonic — a 0.0.0 tag published after 0.1.1 archives the pre-package standalone script — so version order and publication order disagree.

◆ Where it's heading

The real development window was 2014 to 2015. The 0.1.2 release did the substantive work, replacing the assumption that SNPs are evenly distributed across chromosomes and handing users control of axis limits, labels and log transformation; 0.1.3 then added annotation by p-value threshold and top-SNP-per-chromosome. After that the package stops. Notably, the archival 0.0.0 entry records that the original script had confidence intervals on QQ plots and richer highlighting than the released package ever regained.

◆ Prediction

With one packaging fix in the last decade, these entries support no prediction of further releases. The package reads as complete for its narrow purpose rather than abandoned mid-arc.

Alternatives to KLINK and qqman

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either KLINK or qqman.

See all KLINK alternatives → · See all qqman alternatives →

Recent activity from KLINK and qqman

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 12d agoKLINKExcel marker maps, more robust map loading, and a published paper
  2. 3mo agoKLINKIn-app help pages, a mutation-model setting, and clearer controls
  3. 1y agoKLINKComplex mutation models become usable via upstream special lumping
  4. 1y agoKLINKDownload fix for XML initials containing hyphens
  5. 1y agoKLINKUnlinked report picks the higher-PIC marker from each pair
  6. 2y agoKLINKMarkers pair dynamically against a 50-marker map, replacing hard-coded pairs
  7. 9y agoqqmanREADME image path fix for pandoc
  8. 11y agoqqmanAnnotate SNPs by p-value threshold or per-chromosome top hit
  9. 11y agoqqmanChromosome ticks stop assuming even SNP spacing; axis control opens up
  10. 12y agoqqmanArchival tag for the pre-package standalone script
  11. 12y agoqqmanVignette touch-up
  12. 12y agoqqmanZenodo archival tag, no code change

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between KLINK and qqman?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. KLINK is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is KLINK better than qqman?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. KLINK is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to KLINK?

Top KLINK alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "KLINK alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/klink for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to qqman?

Top qqman alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qqman alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qqman-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.