← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

glyanno vs qqman

A side-by-side editorial comparison of glyanno and qqman — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

glyanno vs qqman: at a glance

Featureglyannoqqman
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score3.80.0
Sparks · 30d10
Top themesglycomics, mass-spectrometry, structure-annotation, databasesgwas, genomics, manhattan-plot, visualization
Last editorial update49m ago14h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is glyanno?

Glycan annotation stops depending on the database having seen the structure before.

glyanno resolves mass spectrometry observations into glycan compositions and structures, converting between m/z, composition and structure, filling in missing detail on partial structures, and mapping results to GlyTouCan accessions. The newest release adds de novo reconstruction of topological N-glycans, falling back to the topological database only when reconstruction is not possible. Batch performance was reworked at the same time, with vector inputs reusing prepared databases and direct lookups instead of repeating setup per element.

Read the full glyanno trajectory →

What is qqman?

The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.

qqman does two things: manhattan() and qq() plots for genome-wide association study results. Its six visible releases run from 2014 to a single 2017 packaging fix, and the last release with any user-facing change shipped in 2015. The archive is non-monotonic — a 0.0.0 tag published after 0.1.1 archives the pre-package standalone script — so version order and publication order disagree.

Read the full qqman trajectory →

glyanno vs qqman: editorial side-by-side

G
glyanno
ANALYTICS
3.8

Glycan annotation stops depending on the database having seen the structure before.

◆ Current state

glyanno resolves mass spectrometry observations into glycan compositions and structures, converting between m/z, composition and structure, filling in missing detail on partial structures, and mapping results to GlyTouCan accessions. The newest release adds de novo reconstruction of topological N-glycans, falling back to the topological database only when reconstruction is not possible. Batch performance was reworked at the same time, with vector inputs reusing prepared databases and direct lookups instead of repeating setup per element.

◆ Where it's heading

The consistent theme is making ambiguous results honest and predictable. return_best moved from returning a shortened tibble to a vector aligned with the input, with NA for unmatched glycans; matching concrete compositions against a generic database now errors instead of silently returning nothing; zero-length database arguments are rejected. Alongside that, functions belonging elsewhere have been pushed down into glyrepr rather than duplicated, which is the same boundary discipline visible across this cohort. Version churn is largely driven by upstream: two of the last six entries exist to absorb breaking changes in glyrepr.

◆ Prediction

De novo reconstruction currently covers topological N-glycans only, so extending it to other structure levels or to O-glycans is the natural next step. The performance work suggests batch annotation of full experiments is now the primary use being optimised for.

Q
qqman
ANALYTICS
0.0

The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.

◆ Current state

qqman does two things: manhattan() and qq() plots for genome-wide association study results. Its six visible releases run from 2014 to a single 2017 packaging fix, and the last release with any user-facing change shipped in 2015. The archive is non-monotonic — a 0.0.0 tag published after 0.1.1 archives the pre-package standalone script — so version order and publication order disagree.

◆ Where it's heading

The real development window was 2014 to 2015. The 0.1.2 release did the substantive work, replacing the assumption that SNPs are evenly distributed across chromosomes and handing users control of axis limits, labels and log transformation; 0.1.3 then added annotation by p-value threshold and top-SNP-per-chromosome. After that the package stops. Notably, the archival 0.0.0 entry records that the original script had confidence intervals on QQ plots and richer highlighting than the released package ever regained.

◆ Prediction

With one packaging fix in the last decade, these entries support no prediction of further releases. The package reads as complete for its narrow purpose rather than abandoned mid-arc.

Alternatives to glyanno and qqman

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either glyanno or qqman.

See all glyanno alternatives → · See all qqman alternatives →

Recent activity from glyanno and qqman

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 24d agoglyannoDe novo reconstruction of topological N-glycans, with database fallback
  2. 3mo agoglyannoGlyTouCan accession mapping and anomeric position filling
  3. 3mo agoglyannoFixes an enhance_struc() break from glyrepr 0.11.0
  4. 4mo agoglyannoExplicit empty return from com_to_struc()
  5. 4mo agoglyannoreturn_best output aligns with input length; silent empty matches now error
  6. 5mo agoglyannoto_level parameter removed from enhance_struc()
  7. 9y agoqqmanREADME image path fix for pandoc
  8. 11y agoqqmanAnnotate SNPs by p-value threshold or per-chromosome top hit
  9. 11y agoqqmanChromosome ticks stop assuming even SNP spacing; axis control opens up
  10. 12y agoqqmanArchival tag for the pre-package standalone script
  11. 12y agoqqmanVignette touch-up
  12. 12y agoqqmanZenodo archival tag, no code change

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between glyanno and qqman?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. glyanno is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is glyanno better than qqman?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. glyanno is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 3.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to glyanno?

Top glyanno alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "glyanno alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/glyanno for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to qqman?

Top qqman alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qqman alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qqman-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.