← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

kernelshap vs tidypolars

A side-by-side editorial comparison of kernelshap and tidypolars — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

kernelshap vs tidypolars: at a glance

Featurekernelshaptidypolars
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesshap, model explainability, sampling algorithms, numerical correctnesspolars, r, dplyr, dataframes
Last editorial update2h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is kernelshap?

kernelshap makes permutation SHAP practical past eight features, then fixes the kernel weights it had wrong.

kernelshap computes model-agnostic SHAP values in R through Kernel SHAP, permutation SHAP and an exact additive explainer. Version 0.8.0 added a sampling permutation-SHAP algorithm with standard errors and early stopping, lifting the practical feature ceiling past what the exact method allows. Version 0.9.0 then corrected a bug in how kernel weights were computed — exact Kernel SHAP now agrees with exact permutation SHAP — and moved parallelism from foreach to doFuture.

Read the full kernelshap trajectory →

What is tidypolars?

tidypolars is grinding toward complete dplyr coverage, one supported function at a time

tidypolars lets you write dplyr and tidyr syntax against Polars DataFrames and LazyFrames. Its releases follow a fixed shape: raise the required polars version, add a handful of newly supported R functions and arguments, fix places where behaviour diverges from dplyr. Recent additions run from %notin% and as.integer() to .before/.after in mutate() and time zone handling in datetime parsing. Cadence is roughly every six to ten weeks and has not varied.

Read the full tidypolars trajectory →

kernelshap vs tidypolars: editorial side-by-side

K
kernelshap
ANALYTICS
0.0

kernelshap makes permutation SHAP practical past eight features, then fixes the kernel weights it had wrong.

◆ Current state

kernelshap computes model-agnostic SHAP values in R through Kernel SHAP, permutation SHAP and an exact additive explainer. Version 0.8.0 added a sampling permutation-SHAP algorithm with standard errors and early stopping, lifting the practical feature ceiling past what the exact method allows. Version 0.9.0 then corrected a bug in how kernel weights were computed — exact Kernel SHAP now agrees with exact permutation SHAP — and moved parallelism from foreach to doFuture.

◆ Where it's heading

Two concerns drive this package: making exact methods reach further, and being demonstrably right. The first shows in the additive explainer, the optional background dataset and the sampling permutation algorithm; the second in unit tests written against Python's shap, credited fixes from outside contributors, and a willingness to ship a correctness fix that changes numbers people have already published. Speed work runs continuously underneath — direct solves replacing the Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse, roughly 10% less memory.

◆ Prediction

The 0.6.0 and 0.7.0 notes each promised a stable 1.0.0 that has not arrived; with the weighting bug fixed and parallelism reworked, a 1.0 release is the most plausible next step.

T
tidypolars
ANALYTICS
0.0

tidypolars is grinding toward complete dplyr coverage, one supported function at a time

◆ Current state

tidypolars lets you write dplyr and tidyr syntax against Polars DataFrames and LazyFrames. Its releases follow a fixed shape: raise the required polars version, add a handful of newly supported R functions and arguments, fix places where behaviour diverges from dplyr. Recent additions run from %notin% and as.integer() to .before/.after in mutate() and time zone handling in datetime parsing. Cadence is roughly every six to ten weeks and has not varied.

◆ Where it's heading

Coverage is the whole strategy, and the target has been widening from dplyr into tidyr — unnest_longer_polars(), separate_longer_delim_polars() and separate_longer_position_polars() bring list-column and string-splitting verbs that have no Polars-idiomatic equivalent in the tidyverse dialect. The other consistent thread is fidelity: distinct() dropping unselected columns, summarize() dropping the last group, relocate() honouring tidy-select helpers, NULL in mutate() behaving as dplyr does. Each of these is a small breaking change made to match the reference rather than to differ from it.

◆ Prediction

The pattern of tracking the polars floor upward every release and following tidyverse changes closely — .by in fill() arrived when tidyr 1.3.2 shipped it — suggests the next releases continue mirroring new dplyr and tidyr arguments rather than adding a distinct capability.

Alternatives to kernelshap and tidypolars

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either kernelshap or tidypolars.

See all kernelshap alternatives → · See all tidypolars alternatives →

Recent activity from kernelshap and tidypolars

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agotidypolarstidypolars 0.19.0
  2. 4mo agotidypolarstidypolars 0.18.0
  3. 6mo agotidypolarstidypolars 0.17.0
  4. 6mo agotidypolarstidypolars 0.16.0
  5. 9mo agotidypolarstidypolars 0.15.1
  6. 9mo agotidypolarstidypolars 0.15.0
  7. 1y agokernelshapKernel weight bug fixed; parallelism moves to doFuture
  8. 1y agokernelshapSampling permutation SHAP with standard errors
  9. 1y agokernelshapBackground data now optional; ranger survival support
  10. 2y agokernelshapFactor-valued predictions dropped
  11. 2y agokernelshapadditive_shap() explains additive models exactly
  12. 2y agokernelshapFaster on plain data.frames

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between kernelshap and tidypolars?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. kernelshap and tidypolars are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is kernelshap better than tidypolars?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. kernelshap and tidypolars are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to kernelshap?

Top kernelshap alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "kernelshap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/kernelshap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tidypolars?

Top tidypolars alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tidypolars alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tidypolars for the full list with editorial commentary on each.