RMVMR
RMVMR is being tidied in lockstep with MVMR, the package it wraps
A side-by-side editorial comparison of kernelshap and posteriordb-r — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
kernelshap makes permutation SHAP practical past eight features, then fixes the kernel weights it had wrong.
kernelshap computes model-agnostic SHAP values in R through Kernel SHAP, permutation SHAP and an exact additive explainer. Version 0.8.0 added a sampling permutation-SHAP algorithm with standard errors and early stopping, lifting the practical feature ceiling past what the exact method allows. Version 0.9.0 then corrected a bug in how kernel weights were computed — exact Kernel SHAP now agrees with exact permutation SHAP — and moved parallelism from foreach to doFuture.
posteriordb's R client ships a test-file fix and nothing else.
posteriordb-r is the R interface to the posteriordb collection of reference Bayesian posteriors, used for benchmarking inference algorithms. The single release in view fixes Stan syntax in test files. Neither the posterior collection nor the client API changes.
kernelshap computes model-agnostic SHAP values in R through Kernel SHAP, permutation SHAP and an exact additive explainer. Version 0.8.0 added a sampling permutation-SHAP algorithm with standard errors and early stopping, lifting the practical feature ceiling past what the exact method allows. Version 0.9.0 then corrected a bug in how kernel weights were computed — exact Kernel SHAP now agrees with exact permutation SHAP — and moved parallelism from foreach to doFuture.
Two concerns drive this package: making exact methods reach further, and being demonstrably right. The first shows in the additive explainer, the optional background dataset and the sampling permutation algorithm; the second in unit tests written against Python's shap, credited fixes from outside contributors, and a willingness to ship a correctness fix that changes numbers people have already published. Speed work runs continuously underneath — direct solves replacing the Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse, roughly 10% less memory.
The 0.6.0 and 0.7.0 notes each promised a stable 1.0.0 that has not arrived; with the weighting bug fixed and parallelism reworked, a 1.0 release is the most plausible next step.
posteriordb-r is the R interface to the posteriordb collection of reference Bayesian posteriors, used for benchmarking inference algorithms. The single release in view fixes Stan syntax in test files. Neither the posterior collection nor the client API changes.
One patch-level entry gives little to read. What it does say is that upkeep here tracks Stan's evolving syntax rather than the database's contents — the client's job is to stay compatible with the language the reference models are written in. Whether the collection itself is growing is not visible from this feed.
Expect further compatibility patches as Stan syntax deprecations land; the entries give no signal on new posteriors or API changes.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either kernelshap or posteriordb-r.
RMVMR is being tidied in lockstep with MVMR, the package it wraps
geoarrow tracks the GeoArrow spec and otherwise just keeps compiling
n2khab keeps retracting interpretations of habitat data it can't actually support
tidypolars is grinding toward complete dplyr coverage, one supported function at a time
OneSampleMR found that argument order in a formula was silently changing its estimates
bpbounds found the same swapped-cell bug twice and clamped its bounds back into range
See all kernelshap alternatives → · See all posteriordb-r alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — r package — within Analytics. kernelshap and posteriordb-r are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. kernelshap and posteriordb-r are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top kernelshap alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "kernelshap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/kernelshap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top posteriordb-r alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "posteriordb-r alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/posteriordb-r-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.