STACAS
Single-cell batch correction that learned to use cell labels, then spent three releases chasing Seurat.
Comparison · Analytics
invasimapr vs tbrf
A side-by-side editorial comparison of invasimapr and tbrf — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
invasimapr vs tbrf: at a glance
What is invasimapr?
invasimapr halved its install size and became citable; the science stayed put.
invasimapr estimates species invasiveness and site invasibility from trait, environmental and resident-community data, exposing a traits → competition → invasion-fitness pipeline behind seven high-level wrappers. Its three releases are all packaging and standards work: a first citable archive in June 2026, then a maturity release bringing it in line with the B-Cubed software development guide. The one behavioral addition in that release is an opt-in standardise_inputs argument on compute_invasion_fitness(), off by default.
What is tbrf?
Time-based rolling statistics for water-quality data, finally getting plotting and padding built in.
tbrf computes rolling statistics over time windows rather than fixed row counts — geometric means, confidence intervals and related summaries indexed by date. That distinction matters for irregularly sampled environmental monitoring data, where a fixed-width window spans different amounts of real time. Version 0.1.7 folds in stat_stepribbon() from ggalt, ships an Entero example dataset for lognormal workflows, and adds na.pad across the tbr_ family.
invasimapr vs tbrf: editorial side-by-side
invasimapr
0.0ANALYTICS
invasimapr halved its install size and became citable; the science stayed put.
◆ Current state
invasimapr estimates species invasiveness and site invasibility from trait, environmental and resident-community data, exposing a traits → competition → invasion-fitness pipeline behind seven high-level wrappers. Its three releases are all packaging and standards work: a first citable archive in June 2026, then a maturity release bringing it in line with the B-Cubed software development guide. The one behavioral addition in that release is an opt-in standardise_inputs argument on compute_invasion_fitness(), off by default.
◆ Where it's heading
The pressure is toward being installable and auditable rather than more capable — install slimmed from roughly 100 MB to 56 MB, R CMD check warnings and notes resolved, sp moved to Suggests, a Darwin Core-aligned data dictionary added, and a Zenodo concept DOI with CITATION.cff, codemeta.json and .zenodo.json. The package moves in lockstep with its B-Cubed sibling dissmapr, tagged within minutes of each other at both 0.1.0 and 0.2.1, which points at project-level standards deadlines rather than independent release decisions. Trait dispersion metrics and scenario exploration remain on the roadmap.
◆ Prediction
Standards compliance is now complete and the roadmap names functional trait dispersion metrics and scenario exploration tools, so the next release is the first that can plausibly be about invasion ecology rather than packaging.
tbrf
0.0ANALYTICS
Time-based rolling statistics for water-quality data, finally getting plotting and padding built in.
◆ Current state
tbrf computes rolling statistics over time windows rather than fixed row counts — geometric means, confidence intervals and related summaries indexed by date. That distinction matters for irregularly sampled environmental monitoring data, where a fixed-width window spans different amounts of real time. Version 0.1.7 folds in stat_stepribbon() from ggalt, ships an Entero example dataset for lognormal workflows, and adds na.pad across the tbr_ family.
◆ Where it's heading
The package spent its middle releases absorbing upstream breakage — a lubridate duration redefinition, a tibble 3.0.0 subassignment change, tidyselect internals. The 0.1.7 release breaks that pattern: it is the first in five years to add capability rather than repair it, and it does so by internalising a stat from an abandoned dependency instead of relying on it. Cadence remains very low, with a five-year gap between 0.1.5 and 0.1.6.
◆ Prediction
Absorbing stat_stepribbon() directly suggests further vendoring of the plotting layer rather than new statistical functions. The entries do not indicate which rolling statistics, if any, are queued next.
Alternatives to invasimapr and tbrf
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either invasimapr or tbrf.
ggtrace
A debugger for ggplot2's internals, hardening its grip as the internals it traces keep moving.
kde1d
A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.
svines
Stationary vine copulas for time series, released in lockstep with the rest of Nagler's vine stack.
gghighlight
A single-purpose ggplot2 extension that has spent six years tracking ggplot2 instead of growing.
rtrek
A Star Trek data package that became a Memory Alpha web client and has been patching scrapers ever since.
See all invasimapr alternatives → · See all tbrf alternatives →
Recent activity from invasimapr and tbrf
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agoinvasimaprVersion bump; notes identical to 0.2.0
- 1mo agoinvasimaprB-Cubed standards alignment; install slimmed to 56 MB
- 1mo agoinvasimaprinvasimapr v0.1.0: First citable release
- 0y agotbrfstat_stepribbon vendored in, plus na.pad on all rolling functions
- 1y agotbrfgm_mean_ci forwards na.rm and zero.propagate correctly
- 6y agotbrfFix internals broken by tibble 3.0.0 subassignment
- 6y agotbrfDate windows recomputed with intervals and periods
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between invasimapr and tbrf?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. invasimapr and tbrf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is invasimapr better than tbrf?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. invasimapr and tbrf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to invasimapr?
Top invasimapr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "invasimapr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/invasimapr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to tbrf?
Top tbrf alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tbrf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tbrf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.