← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

kde1d vs tbrf

A side-by-side editorial comparison of kde1d and tbrf — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

kde1d vs tbrf: at a glance

Featurekde1dtbrf
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesdensity-estimation, kernel-methods, zero-inflation, cpp-libraryrolling-statistics, water-quality, time-series, environmental-data
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is kde1d?

A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.

kde1d estimates univariate densities with local polynomial kernel methods, handling bounded, discrete and now zero-inflated variables through a single type argument, with the numerical work in a header-only C++ library usable outside R. Version 1.1.0 added the zero-inflated discrete-continuous mixture case and shipped a new C++ API as an explicit breaking change; 1.1.1 followed in June with auto-generated notes and no description.

Read the full kde1d trajectory →

What is tbrf?

Time-based rolling statistics for water-quality data, finally getting plotting and padding built in.

tbrf computes rolling statistics over time windows rather than fixed row counts — geometric means, confidence intervals and related summaries indexed by date. That distinction matters for irregularly sampled environmental monitoring data, where a fixed-width window spans different amounts of real time. Version 0.1.7 folds in stat_stepribbon() from ggalt, ships an Entero example dataset for lognormal workflows, and adds na.pad across the tbr_ family.

Read the full tbrf trajectory →

kde1d vs tbrf: editorial side-by-side

K
kde1d
ANALYTICS
0.0

A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.

◆ Current state

kde1d estimates univariate densities with local polynomial kernel methods, handling bounded, discrete and now zero-inflated variables through a single type argument, with the numerical work in a header-only C++ library usable outside R. Version 1.1.0 added the zero-inflated discrete-continuous mixture case and shipped a new C++ API as an explicit breaking change; 1.1.1 followed in June with auto-generated notes and no description.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has alternated between performance work and widening the class of data it accepts. The 1.0.0 release was the performance milestone — FFT-based estimation, a better integration algorithm for the p, q and r functions, deterministic jittering replacing randomness, and standalone C++ headers. The 1.1.0 release is the scope milestone, adding a third data type to the two it already handled. Releases come from the same maintainer as svines and cluster on shared dates, so changes in the underlying C++ surface across the vine and density stack tend to ship together.

◆ Prediction

With the C++ API deliberately reworked for standalone use at 1.1.0, further work most plausibly consolidates that interface rather than adding data types. What 1.1.1 actually changed is not readable from its body.

T
tbrf
ANALYTICS
0.0

Time-based rolling statistics for water-quality data, finally getting plotting and padding built in.

◆ Current state

tbrf computes rolling statistics over time windows rather than fixed row counts — geometric means, confidence intervals and related summaries indexed by date. That distinction matters for irregularly sampled environmental monitoring data, where a fixed-width window spans different amounts of real time. Version 0.1.7 folds in stat_stepribbon() from ggalt, ships an Entero example dataset for lognormal workflows, and adds na.pad across the tbr_ family.

◆ Where it's heading

The package spent its middle releases absorbing upstream breakage — a lubridate duration redefinition, a tibble 3.0.0 subassignment change, tidyselect internals. The 0.1.7 release breaks that pattern: it is the first in five years to add capability rather than repair it, and it does so by internalising a stat from an abandoned dependency instead of relying on it. Cadence remains very low, with a five-year gap between 0.1.5 and 0.1.6.

◆ Prediction

Absorbing stat_stepribbon() directly suggests further vendoring of the plotting layer rather than new statistical functions. The entries do not indicate which rolling statistics, if any, are queued next.

Alternatives to kde1d and tbrf

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either kde1d or tbrf.

See all kde1d alternatives → · See all tbrf alternatives →

Recent activity from kde1d and tbrf

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 0y agotbrfstat_stepribbon vendored in, plus na.pad on all rolling functions
  2. 1y agokde1dkde1d 1.1.1
  3. 1y agotbrfgm_mean_ci forwards na.rm and zero.propagate correctly
  4. 1y agokde1dZero-inflated mixtures and a new standalone C++ API
  5. 4y agokde1dBit-wise Boolean operations removed
  6. 5y agokde1ddkde1d() invisible output fixed
  7. 5y agokde1dValgrind false positive silenced
  8. 6y agotbrfFix internals broken by tibble 3.0.0 subassignment
  9. 6y agotbrfDate windows recomputed with intervals and periods
  10. 6y agokde1dqrng dependency dropped; undefined behaviour fixed

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between kde1d and tbrf?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. kde1d and tbrf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is kde1d better than tbrf?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. kde1d and tbrf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to kde1d?

Top kde1d alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "kde1d alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/kde1d for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tbrf?

Top tbrf alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tbrf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tbrf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.