← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

intsurv vs skylight

A side-by-side editorial comparison of intsurv and skylight — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

intsurv vs skylight: at a glance

Featureintsurvskylight
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessurvival-analysis, cure-models, censored-data, regularizationastronomy, illuminance, cpp-port, scientific-computing
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is intsurv?

A Cox cure-rate model package woke up after four years to simplify its own interface.

intsurv fits Cox cure rate models for right-censored survival data where event status may be uncertain — the case where you cannot tell whether a subject experienced the event or was never susceptible to it. The core has been stable since 2019: cox_cure() and its regularized counterpart cox_cure_net(), plus a weighted concordance index and a data simulator. After more than four years without a release, version 0.3.0 arrived in September 2025 and restructured how those two functions are configured rather than adding capability.

Read the full intsurv trajectory →

What is skylight?

A frozen astronomical model quietly became the inner loop of its sibling's optimizer.

skylight returns sun and moon illuminance, azimuth and altitude for a given date, time and location, implemented as a near-verbatim transcription of a 1987 US Naval Observatory circular. The model formulation has not changed since the initial 2022 release and the author states so explicitly. Everything shipped since has been packaging, citation and speed: v1.3 moved the main routine from R to C++, and v1.4 removed a parameter check that was flooding the console with messages.

Read the full skylight trajectory →

intsurv vs skylight: editorial side-by-side

I
intsurv
ANALYTICS
0.0

A Cox cure-rate model package woke up after four years to simplify its own interface.

◆ Current state

intsurv fits Cox cure rate models for right-censored survival data where event status may be uncertain — the case where you cannot tell whether a subject experienced the event or was never susceptible to it. The core has been stable since 2019: cox_cure() and its regularized counterpart cox_cure_net(), plus a weighted concordance index and a data simulator. After more than four years without a release, version 0.3.0 arrived in September 2025 and restructured how those two functions are configured rather than adding capability.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has reached the point where the methods are settled and the remaining work is ergonomics. Moving control parameters, M-step settings and penalty specification into cox_cure.control(), cox_cure.mstep() and cox_cure_net.penalty() follows the established R convention of separating tuning from the model formula, and it arrives long after the arguments accumulated. The C++ headers were placed in inst/include as early as 2019 so other packages could link against them, which suggests the implementation was always intended to be reused.

◆ Prediction

The gap between 0.2.2 and 0.3.0 makes cadence a poor basis for prediction. What the entries do support is that the interface rework is unfinished business rather than a prelude to new methods, so consolidation around the new helper functions is the likelier next step.

S
skylight
ANALYTICS
0.0

A frozen astronomical model quietly became the inner loop of its sibling's optimizer.

◆ Current state

skylight returns sun and moon illuminance, azimuth and altitude for a given date, time and location, implemented as a near-verbatim transcription of a 1987 US Naval Observatory circular. The model formulation has not changed since the initial 2022 release and the author states so explicitly. Everything shipped since has been packaging, citation and speed: v1.3 moved the main routine from R to C++, and v1.4 removed a parameter check that was flooding the console with messages.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a reference implementation of a published algorithm rather than a product accumulating features, and it is being maintained that way. The movement that does occur is driven from downstream: the C++ port was written for the inverse-modelling loop in the sibling skytrackr package, which calls skylight repeatedly during optimization. That reframes skylight from a standalone calculator into the compute kernel another package's fitting routine depends on.

◆ Prediction

With the model formulation deliberately fixed and the C++ path already in place, the next release is most likely another small maintenance fix. The entries give no indication of planned new capability.

Alternatives to intsurv and skylight

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either intsurv or skylight.

See all intsurv alternatives → · See all skylight alternatives →

Recent activity from intsurv and skylight

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 9mo agoskylightNoisy parameter check removed from console output
  2. 10mo agointsurvModel configuration moves into dedicated control functions
  3. 10mo agoskylightCore routine moves from R to C++ for repeated-call speed
  4. 2y agoskylightCitation updated after the companion paper published
  5. 3y agoskylightSkylight v1.1
  6. 3y agoskylightFirst release: sun and moon illuminance from the 1987 USNO circular
  7. 5y agointsurvCross-validated model selection and offset terms added
  8. 6y agointsurvC++ headers relocated so other packages can link them
  9. 7y agointsurvCox cure models for uncertain event status arrive
  10. 7y agointsurvParameter initialization methods added to the alpha
  11. 7y agointsurvAlpha cut for paper submission and simulation reproducibility

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between intsurv and skylight?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. intsurv and skylight are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is intsurv better than skylight?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. intsurv and skylight are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to intsurv?

Top intsurv alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "intsurv alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/intsurv for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to skylight?

Top skylight alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "skylight alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/skylight for the full list with editorial commentary on each.