← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

intsurv vs kde1d

A side-by-side editorial comparison of intsurv and kde1d — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

intsurv vs kde1d: at a glance

Featureintsurvkde1d
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessurvival-analysis, cure-models, censored-data, regularizationdensity-estimation, kernel-methods, zero-inflation, cpp-library
Last editorial update2h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is intsurv?

A Cox cure-rate model package woke up after four years to simplify its own interface.

intsurv fits Cox cure rate models for right-censored survival data where event status may be uncertain — the case where you cannot tell whether a subject experienced the event or was never susceptible to it. The core has been stable since 2019: cox_cure() and its regularized counterpart cox_cure_net(), plus a weighted concordance index and a data simulator. After more than four years without a release, version 0.3.0 arrived in September 2025 and restructured how those two functions are configured rather than adding capability.

Read the full intsurv trajectory →

What is kde1d?

A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.

kde1d estimates univariate densities with local polynomial kernel methods, handling bounded, discrete and now zero-inflated variables through a single type argument, with the numerical work in a header-only C++ library usable outside R. Version 1.1.0 added the zero-inflated discrete-continuous mixture case and shipped a new C++ API as an explicit breaking change; 1.1.1 followed in June with auto-generated notes and no description.

Read the full kde1d trajectory →

intsurv vs kde1d: editorial side-by-side

I
intsurv
ANALYTICS
0.0

A Cox cure-rate model package woke up after four years to simplify its own interface.

◆ Current state

intsurv fits Cox cure rate models for right-censored survival data where event status may be uncertain — the case where you cannot tell whether a subject experienced the event or was never susceptible to it. The core has been stable since 2019: cox_cure() and its regularized counterpart cox_cure_net(), plus a weighted concordance index and a data simulator. After more than four years without a release, version 0.3.0 arrived in September 2025 and restructured how those two functions are configured rather than adding capability.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has reached the point where the methods are settled and the remaining work is ergonomics. Moving control parameters, M-step settings and penalty specification into cox_cure.control(), cox_cure.mstep() and cox_cure_net.penalty() follows the established R convention of separating tuning from the model formula, and it arrives long after the arguments accumulated. The C++ headers were placed in inst/include as early as 2019 so other packages could link against them, which suggests the implementation was always intended to be reused.

◆ Prediction

The gap between 0.2.2 and 0.3.0 makes cadence a poor basis for prediction. What the entries do support is that the interface rework is unfinished business rather than a prelude to new methods, so consolidation around the new helper functions is the likelier next step.

K
kde1d
ANALYTICS
0.0

A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.

◆ Current state

kde1d estimates univariate densities with local polynomial kernel methods, handling bounded, discrete and now zero-inflated variables through a single type argument, with the numerical work in a header-only C++ library usable outside R. Version 1.1.0 added the zero-inflated discrete-continuous mixture case and shipped a new C++ API as an explicit breaking change; 1.1.1 followed in June with auto-generated notes and no description.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has alternated between performance work and widening the class of data it accepts. The 1.0.0 release was the performance milestone — FFT-based estimation, a better integration algorithm for the p, q and r functions, deterministic jittering replacing randomness, and standalone C++ headers. The 1.1.0 release is the scope milestone, adding a third data type to the two it already handled. Releases come from the same maintainer as svines and cluster on shared dates, so changes in the underlying C++ surface across the vine and density stack tend to ship together.

◆ Prediction

With the C++ API deliberately reworked for standalone use at 1.1.0, further work most plausibly consolidates that interface rather than adding data types. What 1.1.1 actually changed is not readable from its body.

Alternatives to intsurv and kde1d

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either intsurv or kde1d.

See all intsurv alternatives → · See all kde1d alternatives →

Recent activity from intsurv and kde1d

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 10mo agointsurvModel configuration moves into dedicated control functions
  2. 1y agokde1dkde1d 1.1.1
  3. 1y agokde1dZero-inflated mixtures and a new standalone C++ API
  4. 4y agokde1dBit-wise Boolean operations removed
  5. 5y agointsurvCross-validated model selection and offset terms added
  6. 5y agokde1ddkde1d() invisible output fixed
  7. 5y agokde1dValgrind false positive silenced
  8. 6y agointsurvC++ headers relocated so other packages can link them
  9. 6y agokde1dqrng dependency dropped; undefined behaviour fixed
  10. 7y agointsurvCox cure models for uncertain event status arrive
  11. 7y agointsurvParameter initialization methods added to the alpha
  12. 7y agointsurvAlpha cut for paper submission and simulation reproducibility

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between intsurv and kde1d?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. intsurv and kde1d are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is intsurv better than kde1d?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. intsurv and kde1d are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to intsurv?

Top intsurv alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "intsurv alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/intsurv for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to kde1d?

Top kde1d alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "kde1d alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/kde1d for the full list with editorial commentary on each.