TidyDensity
A distribution catalogue that grows by one family at a time, and rarely breaks anything.
Comparison · Analytics
intsurv vs PurpleAir
A side-by-side editorial comparison of intsurv and PurpleAir — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
intsurv vs PurpleAir: at a glance
What is intsurv?
A Cox cure-rate model package woke up after four years to simplify its own interface.
intsurv fits Cox cure rate models for right-censored survival data where event status may be uncertain — the case where you cannot tell whether a subject experienced the event or was never susceptible to it. The core has been stable since 2019: cox_cure() and its regularized counterpart cox_cure_net(), plus a weighted concordance index and a data simulator. After more than four years without a release, version 0.3.0 arrived in September 2025 and restructured how those two functions are configured rather than adding capability.
What is PurpleAir?
The R client for PurpleAir sensors keeps finding its time-averaging was wrong.
PurpleAir is a small R client for the PurpleAir air quality sensor API, covering sensor queries, historical readings, and — more recently — finding a sensor on the local network by IP address and id. Authentication has been simplified to an environment variable only, with the redundant key argument removed. The package is maintained reactively, and most of what ships is correctness work on the queries it already makes.
intsurv vs PurpleAir: editorial side-by-side
intsurv
0.0ANALYTICS
A Cox cure-rate model package woke up after four years to simplify its own interface.
◆ Current state
intsurv fits Cox cure rate models for right-censored survival data where event status may be uncertain — the case where you cannot tell whether a subject experienced the event or was never susceptible to it. The core has been stable since 2019: cox_cure() and its regularized counterpart cox_cure_net(), plus a weighted concordance index and a data simulator. After more than four years without a release, version 0.3.0 arrived in September 2025 and restructured how those two functions are configured rather than adding capability.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has reached the point where the methods are settled and the remaining work is ergonomics. Moving control parameters, M-step settings and penalty specification into cox_cure.control(), cox_cure.mstep() and cox_cure_net.penalty() follows the established R convention of separating tuning from the model formula, and it arrives long after the arguments accumulated. The C++ headers were placed in inst/include as early as 2019 so other packages could link against them, which suggests the implementation was always intended to be reused.
◆ Prediction
The gap between 0.2.2 and 0.3.0 makes cadence a poor basis for prediction. What the entries do support is that the interface rework is unfinished business rather than a prelude to new methods, so consolidation around the new helper functions is the likelier next step.
PurpleAir
0.0ANALYTICS
The R client for PurpleAir sensors keeps finding its time-averaging was wrong.
◆ Current state
PurpleAir is a small R client for the PurpleAir air quality sensor API, covering sensor queries, historical readings, and — more recently — finding a sensor on the local network by IP address and id. Authentication has been simplified to an environment variable only, with the redundant key argument removed. The package is maintained reactively, and most of what ships is correctness work on the queries it already makes.
◆ Where it's heading
The recurring theme is time aggregation. Weekly, monthly and yearly average intervals were wrong and fixed in one release; the weekly average was wrong again and fixed in the next. For an air quality package that is not incidental — averaging window is what turns a stream of sensor readings into an exposure estimate, and downstream analyses inherit the error silently. The other thread is failing earlier and more clearly: explicit errors for spatial inputs the sensor query does not accept, better index parsing so malformed requests never reach the API, and handling for history calls that return nothing. Local sensor discovery is the one genuine capability addition, opening a path that does not depend on the cloud API at all.
◆ Prediction
On this record, further aggregation and input-validation fixes are the likeliest next releases; whether local network access grows past discovery into full local data retrieval is not something the entries indicate.
Alternatives to intsurv and PurpleAir
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either intsurv or PurpleAir.
cfbfastr
College football's open data client hit v2 — and now reports how many API calls you have left.
rnpn
The USA phenology data client rebuilt its entire stack and stopped handing users -9999 as a number.
GeneNMF
GeneNMF rebuilt how it derives meta-programs, changing every result it had produced.
rempsyc
Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.
sdsfun
A spatial-statistics utility package exists to be depended on, and is built accordingly.
See all intsurv alternatives → · See all PurpleAir alternatives →
Recent activity from intsurv and PurpleAir
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 3mo agoPurpleAirWeekly averages fixed again; API key argument dropped
- 10mo agointsurvModel configuration moves into dedicated control functions
- 10mo agoPurpleAirLocal sensor discovery, and averaging intervals corrected
- 1y agoPurpleAirBounding box sensor queries fixed
- 5y agointsurvCross-validated model selection and offset terms added
- 6y agointsurvC++ headers relocated so other packages can link them
- 7y agointsurvCox cure models for uncertain event status arrive
- 7y agointsurvParameter initialization methods added to the alpha
- 7y agointsurvAlpha cut for paper submission and simulation reproducibility
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between intsurv and PurpleAir?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. intsurv and PurpleAir are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is intsurv better than PurpleAir?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. intsurv and PurpleAir are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to intsurv?
Top intsurv alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "intsurv alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/intsurv for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to PurpleAir?
Top PurpleAir alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "PurpleAir alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/purpleair for the full list with editorial commentary on each.