← Back to home
Comparison · Collab

HedgeDoc vs Joplin

A side-by-side editorial comparison of HedgeDoc and Joplin — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

HedgeDoc vs Joplin: at a glance

FeatureHedgeDocJoplin
SectorCollabCollab
Velocity score2.56.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themesmarkdown, collaborative-editing, security-fixes, self-hostednote-taking, ai-integration, privacy, mcp
Last editorial update21d ago1d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is HedgeDoc?

A collaborative markdown editor on a security-driven maintenance cadence.

HedgeDoc's 1.x line ships every one to two months and is dominated by security response. Recent releases carry seven advisories between them — HTML injection via an email localpart, YAML frontmatter denial of service, CSRF in the Gist export, a rate-limit bypass through CF-Connecting-IP, a permission-value validation gap, missing upload security headers, and script execution in uploaded SVGs. Around those sit configuration knobs for the external-link warning, webp uploads, and rate limits.

Read the full HedgeDoc trajectory →

What is Joplin?

Joplin 3.7 ships AI chat, semantic search, and MCP integration — all off by default, all controllable by the user.

Joplin 3.7 is the product's first real AI release: an in-app chat panel for querying the currently open note, semantic (meaning-based) search across notebooks, and an MCP server that lets external AI assistants connect to Joplin's note graph. The implementation is privacy-first by design — AI is disabled by default, local models (Ollama, LM Studio) are explicitly supported, and cloud AI services only receive the specific note content relevant to a request rather than the full notebook. A companion documentation post published September 14 lays out the privacy model explicitly.

Read the full Joplin trajectory →

HedgeDoc vs Joplin: editorial side-by-side

H
HedgeDoc
COLLAB
2.5

A collaborative markdown editor on a security-driven maintenance cadence.

◆ Current state

HedgeDoc's 1.x line ships every one to two months and is dominated by security response. Recent releases carry seven advisories between them — HTML injection via an email localpart, YAML frontmatter denial of service, CSRF in the Gist export, a rate-limit bypass through CF-Connecting-IP, a permission-value validation gap, missing upload security headers, and script execution in uploaded SVGs. Around those sit configuration knobs for the external-link warning, webp uploads, and rate limits.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run in parallel. The perimeter work reduces attack surface and maintenance burden at once: old API endpoints and unused config are deleted, Node 18 support is dropped now that its security window has closed, and features added in one release tend to gain an off switch in the next. The second thread is realtime correctness — concurrent-editing data loss, connections dropped mid-handshake, operations discarded during revision gap recovery — which is the only work aimed at the core editing experience rather than its edges.

◆ Prediction

Expect the 1.x line to continue as security and correctness maintenance, with more legacy endpoints and configuration removed rather than new editing features added.

J
Joplin
COLLAB
6.3

Joplin 3.7 ships AI chat, semantic search, and MCP integration — all off by default, all controllable by the user.

◆ Current state

Joplin 3.7 is the product's first real AI release: an in-app chat panel for querying the currently open note, semantic (meaning-based) search across notebooks, and an MCP server that lets external AI assistants connect to Joplin's note graph. The implementation is privacy-first by design — AI is disabled by default, local models (Ollama, LM Studio) are explicitly supported, and cloud AI services only receive the specific note content relevant to a request rather than the full notebook. A companion documentation post published September 14 lays out the privacy model explicitly.

◆ Where it's heading

Joplin is repositioning from a sync-agnostic note-taking app into an AI-native knowledge base, differentiated by opt-in, local-first controls. The HMD Terra M preload partnership and the warrant canary point to a deliberate push toward privacy-conscious enterprise and professional users who distrust cloud-first tools. The MCP integration is particularly strategic: it makes Joplin's note graph accessible to external orchestration pipelines without locking into any particular AI provider.

◆ Prediction

The next major release will likely expand AI chat to multi-note context — currently limited to the open note — and add more configurable MCP tools. The HTR (handwritten text recognition) project from the 2024 French government partnership is also likely to appear in a near-term release.

Alternatives to HedgeDoc and Joplin

Other Collab products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either HedgeDoc or Joplin.

See all HedgeDoc alternatives → · See all Joplin alternatives →

Recent activity from HedgeDoc and Joplin

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2d agoJoplinYour notes and AI: privacy first
  2. 16d agoJoplinWhat's new in Joplin 3.7
  3. 25d agoHedgeDocHedgeDoc 1.12.0
  4. 1mo agoHedgeDocHedgeDoc 1.11.1
  5. 2mo agoHedgeDocHedgeDoc 1.11.0
  6. 4mo agoJoplinWhat's new in Joplin 3.6
  7. 5mo agoHedgeDocHedgeDoc 1.10.8
  8. 6mo agoHedgeDocHedgeDoc 1.10.7
  9. 6mo agoJoplinIntroducing our Warrant Canary
  10. 7mo agoJoplinJoplin will come preloaded on the HMD Terra M
  11. 7mo agoHedgeDocHedgeDoc 1.10.6
  12. 8mo agoJoplinWhat's new in Joplin 3.5

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between HedgeDoc and Joplin?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Joplin is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is HedgeDoc better than Joplin?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Joplin is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Collab products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to HedgeDoc?

Top HedgeDoc alternatives in Collab are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "HedgeDoc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/hedgedoc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Joplin?

Top Joplin alternatives in Collab are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Joplin alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/joplin for the full list with editorial commentary on each.