← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

hdnom vs wasserportal

A side-by-side editorial comparison of hdnom and wasserportal — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

hdnom vs wasserportal: at a glance

Featurehdnomwasserportal
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score5.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessurvival analysis, r, regularization, nomogramsgroundwater-monitoring, web-scraping, thingsboard, iot-telemetry
Last editorial update2h ago49m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is hdnom?

hdnom is in pure custodial mode, absorbing glmnet's changes so its users don't have to

hdnom builds nomograms and validation/calibration workflows for high-dimensional Cox survival models on top of glmnet, ncvreg and penalized. The package's own interface has been stable since the 6.0.0 refactor in 2019; every release since has been maintenance. The recent run is entirely about surviving glmnet's evolution — a lambda-selection rule argument, then a cox.ties argument pinning the old tie handling.

Read the full hdnom trajectory →

What is wasserportal?

A Berlin groundwater scraper grew a full IoT publishing pipeline in two days.

wasserportal scrapes groundwater and surface water monitoring data from Wasserportal Berlin — station metadata, water levels, quality series. For its first four years that was the whole product, with releases tracking the portal's own churn: a new API version in 2023, new three-letter variable codes, and a 2026 fix decoding pages as windows-1252 because the server declares UTF-8 but emits Latin-1. In June 2026 it added a ThingsBoard integration, then extended it to self-hosted instances two days later.

Read the full wasserportal trajectory →

hdnom vs wasserportal: editorial side-by-side

H
hdnom
ANALYTICS
5.0

hdnom is in pure custodial mode, absorbing glmnet's changes so its users don't have to

◆ Current state

hdnom builds nomograms and validation/calibration workflows for high-dimensional Cox survival models on top of glmnet, ncvreg and penalized. The package's own interface has been stable since the 6.0.0 refactor in 2019; every release since has been maintenance. The recent run is entirely about surviving glmnet's evolution — a lambda-selection rule argument, then a cox.ties argument pinning the old tie handling.

◆ Where it's heading

The releases track two upstream pressures with no feature work of its own. glmnet is the larger one: its 4.1-9 change to how Cox cross-validation errors are normalized made lambda.1se select null models far more often, forcing hdnom to expose a rule argument and switch its examples to lambda.min. R-devel is the other, producing a steady trickle of strict-headers, deprecated-symbol and check-note fixes. The pattern is consistent — absorb the upstream change, default to whatever preserves existing behaviour, let users opt into the new one.

◆ Prediction

The cox.ties default is explicitly pinned to "breslow" to silence glmnet's migration warning, which is a deferral rather than a decision; expect a future release to flip that default to "efron" once glmnet completes the transition.

W
wasserportal
ANALYTICS
0.0

A Berlin groundwater scraper grew a full IoT publishing pipeline in two days.

◆ Current state

wasserportal scrapes groundwater and surface water monitoring data from Wasserportal Berlin — station metadata, water levels, quality series. For its first four years that was the whole product, with releases tracking the portal's own churn: a new API version in 2023, new three-letter variable codes, and a 2026 fix decoding pages as windows-1252 because the server declares UTF-8 but emits Latin-1. In June 2026 it added a ThingsBoard integration, then extended it to self-hosted instances two days later.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is repositioning from a data-access library into the first half of a monitoring pipeline. 0.6.0 shipped push helpers, device discovery and cleanup, an importable dashboard and a GitHub Actions workflow; 0.7.0 immediately generalised the authentication so it works against self-hosted Community Edition rather than only the Cloud tier, and lifted the push from a five-station demo to the entire groundwater archive. The hardening detail in 0.7.0 — retries on 5xx, warnings when only one of two credentials is set — reads like a maintainer who has run this against a real deployment.

◆ Prediction

The obvious next step is extending the ThingsBoard path to the surface water stations, which the package has flagged as under-supported since 0.1.0. The entries show no other direction under construction.

Alternatives to hdnom and wasserportal

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either hdnom or wasserportal.

See all hdnom alternatives → · See all wasserportal alternatives →

Recent activity from hdnom and wasserportal

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 18d agohdnomhdnom 6.2.1
  2. 18d agohdnomhdnom 6.2.0 pins Cox tie handling ahead of glmnet's migration
  3. 1mo agowasserportalSelf-hosted ThingsBoard support via JWT login
  4. 1mo agowasserportalThingsBoard integration turns the scraper into a pipeline
  5. 3mo agowasserportalwindows-1252 decoding fixes umlaut handling on Windows
  6. 1y agohdnomhdnom 6.1.0 exposes lambda selection after a glmnet normalization change
  7. 1y agohdnomhdnom 6.0.4
  8. 2y agohdnomhdnom 6.0.3
  9. 3y agohdnomhdnom 6.0.2
  10. 3y agowasserportalExport and import functions for scraped datasets
  11. 3y agowasserportalAdapted to Wasserportal's new API version
  12. 4y agowasserportalTemperature parameter naming corrected

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between hdnom and wasserportal?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. hdnom is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is hdnom better than wasserportal?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. hdnom is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to hdnom?

Top hdnom alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "hdnom alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/hdnom for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to wasserportal?

Top wasserportal alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "wasserportal alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/wasserportal for the full list with editorial commentary on each.