← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

gtsummary vs hdnom

A side-by-side editorial comparison of gtsummary and hdnom — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

gtsummary vs hdnom: at a glance

Featuregtsummaryhdnom
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.05.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesclinical-tables, analysis-results-data, regression-summaries, reproducible-reportingsurvival analysis, r, regularization, nomograms
Last editorial update1h ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is gtsummary?

gtsummary is quietly rebuilding itself around analysis results data, one table verb at a time.

gtsummary builds publication-ready summary, regression and survival tables for clinical and epidemiological work. Across this window it has grown in two directions at once: table composition primitives — splitting tables by rows and columns, stacking with labeled IDs, nested strata stacks, flexible merge columns — and a steadily deepening ARD layer, where tbl_ard_* functions, gather_ard() and the hierarchical table family expose the underlying analysis results data as a first-class object.

Read the full gtsummary trajectory →

What is hdnom?

hdnom is in pure custodial mode, absorbing glmnet's changes so its users don't have to

hdnom builds nomograms and validation/calibration workflows for high-dimensional Cox survival models on top of glmnet, ncvreg and penalized. The package's own interface has been stable since the 6.0.0 refactor in 2019; every release since has been maintenance. The recent run is entirely about surviving glmnet's evolution — a lambda-selection rule argument, then a cox.ties argument pinning the old tie handling.

Read the full hdnom trajectory →

gtsummary vs hdnom: editorial side-by-side

G
gtsummary
ANALYTICS
0.0

gtsummary is quietly rebuilding itself around analysis results data, one table verb at a time.

◆ Current state

gtsummary builds publication-ready summary, regression and survival tables for clinical and epidemiological work. Across this window it has grown in two directions at once: table composition primitives — splitting tables by rows and columns, stacking with labeled IDs, nested strata stacks, flexible merge columns — and a steadily deepening ARD layer, where tbl_ard_* functions, gather_ard() and the hierarchical table family expose the underlying analysis results data as a first-class object.

◆ Where it's heading

The ARD work is the through-line. Table IDs exist so gather_ard() can return a named list; hierarchical tables gained per-level sorting and targeted filtering; ARD inputs are pre-processed so sorting applies to non-standard shapes. The package is becoming a structured-results engine that happens to render tables, rather than a renderer alone. Alongside that, 2.2.0 restored data pre-processing that 2.0 had removed after the reduced functionality hurt users — a maintainer willing to reverse a major-version decision.

◆ Prediction

Expect the hierarchical and ARD functions, introduced as a preview without a full deprecation cycle, to keep stabilizing toward a settled API rather than new table types appearing.

H
hdnom
ANALYTICS
5.0

hdnom is in pure custodial mode, absorbing glmnet's changes so its users don't have to

◆ Current state

hdnom builds nomograms and validation/calibration workflows for high-dimensional Cox survival models on top of glmnet, ncvreg and penalized. The package's own interface has been stable since the 6.0.0 refactor in 2019; every release since has been maintenance. The recent run is entirely about surviving glmnet's evolution — a lambda-selection rule argument, then a cox.ties argument pinning the old tie handling.

◆ Where it's heading

The releases track two upstream pressures with no feature work of its own. glmnet is the larger one: its 4.1-9 change to how Cox cross-validation errors are normalized made lambda.1se select null models far more often, forcing hdnom to expose a rule argument and switch its examples to lambda.min. R-devel is the other, producing a steady trickle of strict-headers, deprecated-symbol and check-note fixes. The pattern is consistent — absorb the upstream change, default to whatever preserves existing behaviour, let users opt into the new one.

◆ Prediction

The cox.ties default is explicitly pinned to "breslow" to silence glmnet's migration warning, which is a deferral rather than a decision; expect a future release to flip that default to "efron" once glmnet completes the transition.

Alternatives to gtsummary and hdnom

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either gtsummary or hdnom.

See all gtsummary alternatives → · See all hdnom alternatives →

Recent activity from gtsummary and hdnom

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 18d agohdnomhdnom 6.2.1
  2. 18d agohdnomhdnom 6.2.0 pins Cox tie handling ahead of glmnet's migration
  3. 2mo agogtsummaryTheme elements no longer evaluated by default
  4. 8mo agogtsummaryARD strata functions and finer theme control
  5. 11mo agogtsummaryPer-level hierarchical sorting and labeled stacking
  6. 1y agogtsummaryTable splitting, ID labeling, and add_difference_row
  7. 1y agohdnomhdnom 6.1.0 exposes lambda selection after a glmnet normalization change
  8. 1y agogtsummaryData pre-processing restored after the 2.0 removal
  9. 1y agogtsummarytbl_merge gains explicit merge columns
  10. 1y agohdnomhdnom 6.0.4
  11. 2y agohdnomhdnom 6.0.3
  12. 3y agohdnomhdnom 6.0.2

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between gtsummary and hdnom?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. hdnom is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is gtsummary better than hdnom?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. hdnom is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to gtsummary?

Top gtsummary alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "gtsummary alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gtsummary-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to hdnom?

Top hdnom alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "hdnom alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/hdnom for the full list with editorial commentary on each.