qqman
The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.
Comparison · Analytics
gtfstools vs weird
A side-by-side editorial comparison of gtfstools and weird — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
gtfstools vs weird: at a glance
What is gtfstools?
gtfstools stopped guarding its own object model and started accepting everyone else's.
gtfstools reads, edits, filters and validates GTFS public transport feeds in R on a data.table backend. Since 1.3.0 it accepts GTFS objects produced by other packages such as gtfsio and tidytransit, converting them through an as_dt_gtfs() generic. Validation runs MobilityData's canonical validator, now supported through v6.0.0.
What is weird?
weird rebuilt itself on distributional objects, and now the anomaly tooling composes with everything else.
An R package for anomaly detection and unusual-observation diagnostics, at four releases with a long gap between the 2024 patch and the 2026 major line. The current shape is set by 2.0.0, which refactored the package onto distributional objects and renamed its central concept from density_scores() to surprisals(). Since then the work has been filling that structure in: surprisals for more model classes, faster bandwidth and probability calculations, and new visual diagnostics.
gtfstools vs weird: editorial side-by-side
gtfstools
0.0ANALYTICS
gtfstools stopped guarding its own object model and started accepting everyone else's.
◆ Current state
gtfstools reads, edits, filters and validates GTFS public transport feeds in R on a data.table backend. Since 1.3.0 it accepts GTFS objects produced by other packages such as gtfsio and tidytransit, converting them through an as_dt_gtfs() generic. Validation runs MobilityData's canonical validator, now supported through v6.0.0.
◆ Where it's heading
The package built out a wide function surface first — filters, geometry conversion, speed and duration calculations — then turned outward. Delegating validation to MobilityData's validator and accepting other packages' objects both trade self-sufficiency for a position inside the wider GTFS ecosystem. Deprecations are handled slowly, with old behaviour left as the default for a release or more.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued validator version tracking and further completion of the deprecation cycle around filter_by_stop_id()'s full_trips behaviour.
weird
0.0ANALYTICS
weird rebuilt itself on distributional objects, and now the anomaly tooling composes with everything else.
◆ Current state
An R package for anomaly detection and unusual-observation diagnostics, at four releases with a long gap between the 2024 patch and the 2026 major line. The current shape is set by 2.0.0, which refactored the package onto distributional objects and renamed its central concept from density_scores() to surprisals(). Since then the work has been filling that structure in: surprisals for more model classes, faster bandwidth and probability calculations, and new visual diagnostics.
◆ Where it's heading
The refactor onto a shared distribution representation is the decision everything else follows from. It let 2.1.0 add hdr() and parameters() methods for kde objects rather than bespoke accessors, and it let 3.0.0 bring in dist_mclust() to turn a Gaussian mixture model into the same object type — so a mixture, a kernel density estimate and a fitted distribution all flow through one interface. The 3.0.0 additions lean visual and multivariate: outlier maps plotting score distance against orthogonal distance, biplot projections with variable axes overlaid, and an augment() method for robust PCA objects. Dependencies have been shed steadily along the way — lookout, interpolation — while mvscale() moved out and then back in.
◆ Prediction
Expect surprisals() coverage to keep extending to further model classes, and the multivariate and robust-PCA diagnostics introduced in 3.0.0 to gain the same distributional-object treatment as the univariate side.
Alternatives to gtfstools and weird
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either gtfstools or weird.
constants
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
austraits
The R client for AusTraits spends its releases chasing the dataset it reads.
ggdemetra
A ggplot2 layer for seasonal adjustment output, filling in one plot type at a time.
fossilsim
A fossil-record simulator that quietly grew a trait-evolution engine.
tern.rbmi
Reference-based multiple imputation tables, shipping only what CRAN checks demand.
See all gtfstools alternatives → · See all weird alternatives →
Recent activity from gtfstools and weird
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agoweirdOutlier maps, biplot projections, and Gaussian mixtures as distributional objects
- 3mo agoweirdsurprisals() reaches glm objects; lookout dependency dropped
- 6mo agoweirdPackage refactored onto distributional objects; density_scores becomes surprisals
- 1y agogtfstoolsSupports canonical GTFS validator v5 and v6
- 1y agogtfstoolsAccepts GTFS objects from gtfsio and tidytransit ⚡
- 2y agoweirdWine reviews dataset replaced with a fetch function
- 3y agogtfstoolsValidation delegated to MobilityData's canonical validator
- 4y agogtfstoolsAdds time-of-day, weekday and frequency filtering functions
- 4y agogtfstoolsEstablishes the core GTFS filtering and sf conversion family
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between gtfstools and weird?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. gtfstools and weird are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is gtfstools better than weird?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. gtfstools and weird are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to gtfstools?
Top gtfstools alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "gtfstools alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gtfstools-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to weird?
Top weird alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "weird alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/weird-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.