← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

gridpattern vs modeltime.resample

A side-by-side editorial comparison of gridpattern and modeltime.resample — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

gridpattern vs modeltime.resample: at a glance

Featuregridpatternmodeltime.resample
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-graphics, pattern-fills, grid, data-visualizationtime series, cross-validation, tidymodels, compatibility maintenance
Last editorial update1h ago5h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is gridpattern?

gridpattern keeps widening its catalogue, and the newest patterns finally use the device's own line rendering.

An R package supplying pattern fills for grid graphics — stripes, weaves, polygon tilings, images and placeholders. Releases are infrequent and irregular, roughly one or two a year with an eighteen-month gap before the most recent. The work divides between adding pattern types and making the existing ones behave consistently, particularly around units and how spacing parameters are interpreted.

Read the full gridpattern trajectory →

What is modeltime.resample?

modeltime.resample exists to keep backtesting working as tidymodels shifts underneath it.

modeltime.resample runs time series cross-validation over modeltime models, returning per-resample predictions and accuracy plots. Version 0.3.0 is the substantive release in view: tune 2.0.0 compatibility, deterministic seeding via withr, guaranteed .predictions output, and clearer failures when resample fits break. The three releases before it are dependency chores.

Read the full modeltime.resample trajectory →

gridpattern vs modeltime.resample: editorial side-by-side

G
gridpattern
ANALYTICS
0.0

gridpattern keeps widening its catalogue, and the newest patterns finally use the device's own line rendering.

◆ Current state

An R package supplying pattern fills for grid graphics — stripes, weaves, polygon tilings, images and placeholders. Releases are infrequent and irregular, roughly one or two a year with an eighteen-month gap before the most recent. The work divides between adding pattern types and making the existing ones behave consistently, particularly around units and how spacing parameters are interpreted.

◆ Where it's heading

Two long-running efforts are visible. The first is unit consistency: v1.2.1 gave the geometry patterns a units parameter, v1.2.2 extended it to weave and fixed polygon tiling to respect it — the slow propagation of one design decision through a family of functions. The second is integration with R's own graphics capabilities, which reaches its clearest expression in v1.4.2's line pattern: rather than filling bands with solid colour as stripe does, it draws stroked lines through the device, so every built-in linetype including dotdash, twodash and custom hex specifications works. The package is also visibly maintaining its external dependencies, having rotated placeholder image services as hosts disappeared.

◆ Prediction

Expect further pattern types and continued propagation of the units parameter to any function still missing it; the entries give no indication of a change in the package's scope beyond pattern fills.

M0.0

modeltime.resample exists to keep backtesting working as tidymodels shifts underneath it.

◆ Current state

modeltime.resample runs time series cross-validation over modeltime models, returning per-resample predictions and accuracy plots. Version 0.3.0 is the substantive release in view: tune 2.0.0 compatibility, deterministic seeding via withr, guaranteed .predictions output, and clearer failures when resample fits break. The three releases before it are dependency chores.

◆ Where it's heading

Every entry here is compatibility work against something upstream — hardhat 1.0.0, workflows regression mode, then tune 2.0.0 twice. The 0.3.0 notes show a second concern emerging alongside it: making failures legible, with .notes on failed fits, actionable errors from unnest_modeltime_resamples(), and fallback logic when prediction columns go missing across versions. Reproducibility gets the same treatment through explicit seeding.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to track the next tidymodels breaking change, with any new work continuing on error reporting rather than resampling strategies.

Alternatives to gridpattern and modeltime.resample

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either gridpattern or modeltime.resample.

See all gridpattern alternatives → · See all modeltime.resample alternatives →

Recent activity from gridpattern and modeltime.resample

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agogridpatternHatch and line patterns added; wave gains ten new types
  2. 11mo agomodeltime.resampletune 2.0 support, deterministic seeding, clearer errors
  3. 11mo agomodeltime.resampleDependency cleanup ahead of the next tune release
  4. 1y agogridpatternaRtsy generative patterns available as fills
  5. 2y agogridpatternunits parameter reaches weave; polygon tiling honours it
  6. 2y agogridpatternpatternFill() returns a grid pattern object; patterns can nest
  7. 2y agogridpatternText pattern example skipped on devices lacking the glyphs
  8. 2y agogridpatternreset_image_cache() added; R 4.1 feature detection offered standalone
  9. 3y agomodeltime.resampleFixes workflows in regression mode
  10. 4y agomodeltime.resampleUpdates for hardhat 1.0.0

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between gridpattern and modeltime.resample?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. gridpattern and modeltime.resample are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is gridpattern better than modeltime.resample?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. gridpattern and modeltime.resample are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to gridpattern?

Top gridpattern alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "gridpattern alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gridpattern-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to modeltime.resample?

Top modeltime.resample alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modeltime.resample alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modeltime-resample for the full list with editorial commentary on each.