← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

epiworldR vs modeltime.resample

A side-by-side editorial comparison of epiworldR and modeltime.resample — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

epiworldR vs modeltime.resample: at a glance

FeatureepiworldRmodeltime.resample
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-package, epidemiology, agent-based-simulation, crantime series, cross-validation, tidymodels, compatibility maintenance
Last editorial update1h ago6h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is epiworldR?

epiworldR is a thin R shell whose releases track the C++ simulator underneath it

Almost every release here is a version bump of the underlying epiworld C++ library, wrapped and pushed to CRAN. The substantive R-side work is narrow and consistent: exposing simulation outputs that were already computed but not reachable from R — outbreak size, active cases, hospitalizations and their savers. The newest release addresses an AddressSanitizer finding, which is the kind of thing CRAN checks surface on a compiled package.

Read the full epiworldR trajectory →

What is modeltime.resample?

modeltime.resample exists to keep backtesting working as tidymodels shifts underneath it.

modeltime.resample runs time series cross-validation over modeltime models, returning per-resample predictions and accuracy plots. Version 0.3.0 is the substantive release in view: tune 2.0.0 compatibility, deterministic seeding via withr, guaranteed .predictions output, and clearer failures when resample fits break. The three releases before it are dependency chores.

Read the full modeltime.resample trajectory →

epiworldR vs modeltime.resample: editorial side-by-side

E
epiworldR
ANALYTICS
0.0

epiworldR is a thin R shell whose releases track the C++ simulator underneath it

◆ Current state

Almost every release here is a version bump of the underlying epiworld C++ library, wrapped and pushed to CRAN. The substantive R-side work is narrow and consistent: exposing simulation outputs that were already computed but not reachable from R — outbreak size, active cases, hospitalizations and their savers. The newest release addresses an AddressSanitizer finding, which is the kind of thing CRAN checks surface on a compiled package.

◆ Where it's heading

The R package's job is staying current with the simulator and satisfying CRAN, not evolving its own interface. What direction it has shows in which model outputs get exposed next, and in a steady tidy-up of the build — the custom configure script was dropped in favour of R's built-in C++17 and OpenMP settings, and test coverage has been filled in across several releases with automated assistance.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to track another epiworld version bump, with any R-side addition most likely being one more exposed metric or saver, following the pattern of get_hospitalizations and get_outbreak_size.

M0.0

modeltime.resample exists to keep backtesting working as tidymodels shifts underneath it.

◆ Current state

modeltime.resample runs time series cross-validation over modeltime models, returning per-resample predictions and accuracy plots. Version 0.3.0 is the substantive release in view: tune 2.0.0 compatibility, deterministic seeding via withr, guaranteed .predictions output, and clearer failures when resample fits break. The three releases before it are dependency chores.

◆ Where it's heading

Every entry here is compatibility work against something upstream — hardhat 1.0.0, workflows regression mode, then tune 2.0.0 twice. The 0.3.0 notes show a second concern emerging alongside it: making failures legible, with .notes on failed fits, actionable errors from unnest_modeltime_resamples(), and fallback logic when prediction columns go missing across versions. Reproducibility gets the same treatment through explicit seeding.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to track the next tidymodels breaking change, with any new work continuing on error reporting rather than resampling strategies.

Alternatives to epiworldR and modeltime.resample

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either epiworldR or modeltime.resample.

See all epiworldR alternatives → · See all modeltime.resample alternatives →

Recent activity from epiworldR and modeltime.resample

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4mo agoepiworldR0.14.0 addresses an AddressSanitizer finding
  2. 5mo agoepiworldRWrapper bumped to track a new epiworld version
  3. 5mo agoepiworldRBuild drops the custom configure script for R's C++17 and OpenMP settings
  4. 6mo agoepiworldRepiworld bumped to 0.11.2
  5. 7mo agoepiworldRTests updated at CRAN's request
  6. 7mo agoepiworldRHospitalizations, outbreak size and active cases exposed to R
  7. 11mo agomodeltime.resampletune 2.0 support, deterministic seeding, clearer errors
  8. 11mo agomodeltime.resampleDependency cleanup ahead of the next tune release
  9. 3y agomodeltime.resampleFixes workflows in regression mode
  10. 4y agomodeltime.resampleUpdates for hardhat 1.0.0

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between epiworldR and modeltime.resample?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. epiworldR and modeltime.resample are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is epiworldR better than modeltime.resample?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. epiworldR and modeltime.resample are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to epiworldR?

Top epiworldR alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "epiworldR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/epiworldr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to modeltime.resample?

Top modeltime.resample alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modeltime.resample alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modeltime-resample for the full list with editorial commentary on each.