← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

epiflows vs modeltime.resample

A side-by-side editorial comparison of epiflows and modeltime.resample — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

epiflows vs modeltime.resample: at a glance

Featureepiflowsmodeltime.resample
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr, epidemiology, dormant, maintenancetime series, cross-validation, tidymodels, compatibility maintenance
Last editorial update1h ago7h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is epiflows?

epiflows has shipped four releases in eight years, none of which changed the code.

epiflows predicts the spread of infectious disease along population flows between locations, and it is effectively dormant. The whole visible history spans 2018 to 2026 in four entries: the first CRAN release, a Zenodo archival tag, a Roxygen patch whose notes state the functionality is unchanged, and a 2026 release replacing deprecated ggplot2 and tibble calls. No entry describes new epidemiological capability.

Read the full epiflows trajectory →

What is modeltime.resample?

modeltime.resample exists to keep backtesting working as tidymodels shifts underneath it.

modeltime.resample runs time series cross-validation over modeltime models, returning per-resample predictions and accuracy plots. Version 0.3.0 is the substantive release in view: tune 2.0.0 compatibility, deterministic seeding via withr, guaranteed .predictions output, and clearer failures when resample fits break. The three releases before it are dependency chores.

Read the full modeltime.resample trajectory →

epiflows vs modeltime.resample: editorial side-by-side

E
epiflows
ANALYTICS
0.0

epiflows has shipped four releases in eight years, none of which changed the code.

◆ Current state

epiflows predicts the spread of infectious disease along population flows between locations, and it is effectively dormant. The whole visible history spans 2018 to 2026 in four entries: the first CRAN release, a Zenodo archival tag, a Roxygen patch whose notes state the functionality is unchanged, and a 2026 release replacing deprecated ggplot2 and tibble calls. No entry describes new epidemiological capability.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is being kept installable rather than developed. The one recent release is dependency maintenance contributed from outside, which is the pattern for RECON-era epidemiology packages that have outlived their original project funding. Two separate entries are both labelled version 0.2.1, so even the version history is not a reliable guide to what changed.

◆ Prediction

Any further releases will most likely be more deprecation cleanup to keep the package on CRAN; there is nothing in the record suggesting active development has resumed.

M0.0

modeltime.resample exists to keep backtesting working as tidymodels shifts underneath it.

◆ Current state

modeltime.resample runs time series cross-validation over modeltime models, returning per-resample predictions and accuracy plots. Version 0.3.0 is the substantive release in view: tune 2.0.0 compatibility, deterministic seeding via withr, guaranteed .predictions output, and clearer failures when resample fits break. The three releases before it are dependency chores.

◆ Where it's heading

Every entry here is compatibility work against something upstream — hardhat 1.0.0, workflows regression mode, then tune 2.0.0 twice. The 0.3.0 notes show a second concern emerging alongside it: making failures legible, with .notes on failed fits, actionable errors from unnest_modeltime_resamples(), and fallback logic when prediction columns go missing across versions. Reproducibility gets the same treatment through explicit seeding.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to track the next tidymodels breaking change, with any new work continuing on error reporting rather than resampling strategies.

Alternatives to epiflows and modeltime.resample

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either epiflows or modeltime.resample.

See all epiflows alternatives → · See all modeltime.resample alternatives →

Recent activity from epiflows and modeltime.resample

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 5mo agoepiflowsDeprecated ggplot2 and tibble calls replaced
  2. 11mo agomodeltime.resampletune 2.0 support, deterministic seeding, clearer errors
  3. 11mo agomodeltime.resampleDependency cleanup ahead of the next tune release
  4. 3y agoepiflowsRoxygen patch for CRAN checks
  5. 3y agomodeltime.resampleFixes workflows in regression mode
  6. 4y agomodeltime.resampleUpdates for hardhat 1.0.0
  7. 7y agoepiflowsFirst Zenodo archival tag
  8. 8y agoepiflowsFirst CRAN release

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between epiflows and modeltime.resample?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. epiflows and modeltime.resample are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is epiflows better than modeltime.resample?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. epiflows and modeltime.resample are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to epiflows?

Top epiflows alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "epiflows alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/epiflows-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to modeltime.resample?

Top modeltime.resample alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modeltime.resample alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modeltime-resample for the full list with editorial commentary on each.