dbt Core
dbt Fusion's second beta is adapter work: ClickHouse gets materializations, indexes, and catalogs
Comparison · Analytics
gratia vs tulpa
A side-by-side editorial comparison of gratia and tulpa — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
gratia vs tulpa: at a glance
What is gratia?
The tidy front-end for GAMs, now stable enough that upstream ggplot2 sets its release calendar.
gratia wraps mgcv-fitted generalized additive models in tidy data frames and ggplot2 graphics — smooth_estimates(), fitted_values(), derivatives(), draw() and appraise() cover evaluation, prediction and diagnostics. The API reached its intended shape at 0.9.0, when every generated column was renamed to a dot-prefixed form, and 0.10.0 added conditional_values() for covariate-conditional prediction plots.
What is tulpa?
The 0.0.x train stops at CRAN: tulpa's engine ships to the ecosystem it already anchors.
tulpa is the C++/R Bayesian spatial inference engine sitting under gcol33's family of ecological occupancy packages, tagging 0.0.x releases several times a week. 0.1.0 is its first CRAN release, and the notes state outright that the engine surface is unchanged from 0.0.198 — the work is packaging discipline: local T bindings rebound to n_t/n_times, OpenMP teams capped under R CMD check, the pkgdown deploy narrowed, an aspell dictionary added. The window behind it splits between the S3 generics conversion and numerical-correctness work in the nested-Laplace grid.
gratia vs tulpa: editorial side-by-side
gratia
0.0ANALYTICS
The tidy front-end for GAMs, now stable enough that upstream ggplot2 sets its release calendar.
◆ Current state
gratia wraps mgcv-fitted generalized additive models in tidy data frames and ggplot2 graphics — smooth_estimates(), fitted_values(), derivatives(), draw() and appraise() cover evaluation, prediction and diagnostics. The API reached its intended shape at 0.9.0, when every generated column was renamed to a dot-prefixed form, and 0.10.0 added conditional_values() for covariate-conditional prediction plots.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has moved through a long rewrite cycle and out the other side. Successive releases replaced evaluate_smooth() with smooth_estimates(), rebuilt draw() on top of it, then renamed the entire output vocabulary to avoid colliding with user variables. That work is finished; 0.11.1 is driven almost entirely by ggplot2 4.0.0 compatibility, with new mgcv family support for quantile residuals riding along. Development now tracks upstream breakage rather than internal redesign.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next releases to continue absorbing ggplot2 4.x and mgcv changes, with incremental family coverage in quantile_residuals() as the visible new work. The entries give no signal on which mgcv families come next.
tulpa
7.5ANALYTICS
The 0.0.x train stops at CRAN: tulpa's engine ships to the ecosystem it already anchors.
◆ Current state
tulpa is the C++/R Bayesian spatial inference engine sitting under gcol33's family of ecological occupancy packages, tagging 0.0.x releases several times a week. 0.1.0 is its first CRAN release, and the notes state outright that the engine surface is unchanged from 0.0.198 — the work is packaging discipline: local T bindings rebound to n_t/n_times, OpenMP teams capped under R CMD check, the pkgdown deploy narrowed, an aspell dictionary added. The window behind it splits between the S3 generics conversion and numerical-correctness work in the nested-Laplace grid.
◆ Where it's heading
Two moves in nine days point at the same destination: the generics conversion made tulpa extensible by downstream packages, and CRAN admission makes it installable by them. The current cadence — several tags a week, some existing only to record a measurement that produced no code change — does not survive CRAN's submission overhead, so the release rhythm has to slow whether or not the project intends it. The correctness work still clusters on the joint nested-Laplace driver, and 0.1.0 extends the same diagnostics habit with .NL_AXIS_SD_REASONS, a closed vocabulary for an outer axis whose grid does not contain its own posterior mode.
◆ Prediction
Expect tulpaObs to follow tulpa onto CRAN, since it is the consumer whose registrations the engine has spent this window unblocking, and expect the version line to move in larger, less frequent steps now that each one carries a submission.
Alternatives to gratia and tulpa
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either gratia or tulpa.
Fulcrum
Fulcrum is betting its whole map stack on Esri, with a hard Google Maps cutoff on September 1.
Holistics
Holistics keeps fencing in the AI layer it spent the summer building.
Dovetail
Dovetail spent July opening doors to other tools and August making its own rooms easier to enter.
AgencyAnalytics
AgencyAI got skills three weeks ago; everything since has been making them routine.
NocoDB
Interfaces gets the permissions layer it needed, one release after launching.
See all gratia alternatives → · See all tulpa alternatives →
Recent activity from gratia and tulpa
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 18h agotulpaFirst CRAN release: engine surface unchanged from 0.0.198 ⚡
- 4d agotulpatulpa_re_aghq() exposes the mode/theta cross-Hessian
- 8d agotulpaDense batched joint path could silently drop a grid cell
- 8d agotulpaCalibration and goodness-of-fit entry points become S3 generics ⚡
- 9d agotulpaCUDA backend had two definitions; link order decided if it ran
- 9d agotulpaHyperparameter bounds now flag when they leave the node range
- 11mo agogratiaggplot2 4.0.0 compatibility, plus four more quantile-residual families
- 1y agogratiaconditional_values() replaces vis.gam for conditional prediction plots
- 2y agogratiaparametric_effects() joins the dot-prefix rename; LSS families begin
- 2y agogratiaEvery generated column gains a dot prefix ⚡
- 3y agogratiaReal variable names in smooth_samples(), plus dplyr 1.1.0 fixes
- 4y agogratiaM1 example output fixes and confint tibble returns
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between gratia and tulpa?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. tulpa is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 0.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is gratia better than tulpa?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. tulpa is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 0.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to gratia?
Top gratia alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "gratia alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gratia for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to tulpa?
Top tulpa alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tulpa alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tulpa for the full list with editorial commentary on each.