← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

gratia vs rempsyc

A side-by-side editorial comparison of gratia and rempsyc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:ggplot2r-package

gratia vs rempsyc: at a glance

Featuregratiarempsyc
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesgam, mgcv, ggplot2, statistical-graphicsapa-formatting, psychology-research, statistical-tables, ggplot2
Last editorial update47m ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is gratia?

The tidy front-end for GAMs, now stable enough that upstream ggplot2 sets its release calendar.

gratia wraps mgcv-fitted generalized additive models in tidy data frames and ggplot2 graphics — smooth_estimates(), fitted_values(), derivatives(), draw() and appraise() cover evaluation, prediction and diagnostics. The API reached its intended shape at 0.9.0, when every generated column was renamed to a dot-prefixed form, and 0.10.0 added conditional_values() for covariate-conditional prediction plots.

Read the full gratia trajectory →

What is rempsyc?

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

Read the full rempsyc trajectory →

gratia vs rempsyc: editorial side-by-side

G
gratia
ANALYTICS
0.0

The tidy front-end for GAMs, now stable enough that upstream ggplot2 sets its release calendar.

◆ Current state

gratia wraps mgcv-fitted generalized additive models in tidy data frames and ggplot2 graphics — smooth_estimates(), fitted_values(), derivatives(), draw() and appraise() cover evaluation, prediction and diagnostics. The API reached its intended shape at 0.9.0, when every generated column was renamed to a dot-prefixed form, and 0.10.0 added conditional_values() for covariate-conditional prediction plots.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has moved through a long rewrite cycle and out the other side. Successive releases replaced evaluate_smooth() with smooth_estimates(), rebuilt draw() on top of it, then renamed the entire output vocabulary to avoid colliding with user variables. That work is finished; 0.11.1 is driven almost entirely by ggplot2 4.0.0 compatibility, with new mgcv family support for quantile residuals riding along. Development now tracks upstream breakage rather than internal redesign.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next releases to continue absorbing ggplot2 4.x and mgcv changes, with incremental family coverage in quantile_residuals() as the visible new work. The entries give no signal on which mgcv families come next.

R
rempsyc
ANALYTICS
0.0

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

◆ Current state

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

◆ Where it's heading

Two forces drive this package and neither is its own roadmap. The first is APA style: when the 7th edition advised against beta for standardized coefficients, the package switched its output to italic b with an asterisk. The second is the surrounding ecosystem — formatting is aligned to what lavaanExtra and afex produce, contrast handling was delegated to easystats' modelbased, and Excel correlation matrix export was handed entirely to the correlation package to cut maintenance.

◆ Prediction

The pattern of delegating functionality to specialist packages while keeping the formatting layer is well established and likely continues. Because releases bundle many small dev versions, the next one will probably again mix plotting refinements with fixes surfaced by upstream changes.

Alternatives to gratia and rempsyc

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either gratia or rempsyc.

See all gratia alternatives → · See all rempsyc alternatives →

Recent activity from gratia and rempsyc

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 11mo agorempsycPoint labels and per-group correlations added to nice_scatter
  2. 11mo agogratiaggplot2 4.0.0 compatibility, plus four more quantile-residual families
  3. 1y agorempsycExcel correlation export delegated to the correlation package
  4. 1y agogratiaconditional_values() replaces vis.gam for conditional prediction plots
  5. 2y agorempsycTable spacing control and a fix for name collision with afex
  6. 2y agogratiaparametric_effects() joins the dot-prefix rename; LSS families begin
  7. 2y agogratiaEvery generated column gains a dot prefix
  8. 2y agorempsycStandardized coefficients switch to APA 7th edition b* notation
  9. 2y agorempsycLegend and standardization-check fixes
  10. 2y agorempsycnice_table starts coercing model objects automatically
  11. 3y agogratiaReal variable names in smooth_samples(), plus dplyr 1.1.0 fixes
  12. 4y agogratiaM1 example output fixes and confint tibble returns

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between gratia and rempsyc?

Both compete on the same themes — ggplot2, r-package — within Analytics. gratia and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is gratia better than rempsyc?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. gratia and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to gratia?

Top gratia alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "gratia alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gratia for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rempsyc?

Top rempsyc alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rempsyc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rempsyc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.