r2rtf
The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely
Comparison · Analytics
graphicalMCP vs lime
A side-by-side editorial comparison of graphicalMCP and lime — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
graphicalMCP vs lime: at a glance
What is graphicalMCP?
graphicalMCP is a narrow statistical tool being hardened rather than grown.
graphicalMCP implements graphical multiple comparison procedures — the method used to control family-wise error across several endpoints in a clinical trial. The package moved under the openpharma organisation in 0.2.6, picked up Hochberg tests and internal validation in 0.2.8, and its most recent release fixes a case where graph testing by closure disagreed with the rejection-based path. Releases are roughly annual and short.
What is lime?
The R port of LIME has shipped one commit in three years, and it was an xgboost compatibility patch
lime is the R implementation of local interpretable model-agnostic explanations, and it is effectively in preservation rather than development. Its last substantive feature release was 0.5.0 in 2019; 0.5.3 in 2022 recorded a maintainer handover and general upkeep; 0.5.4 in December 2025 exists solely to keep the package working across xgboost versions. Six releases span eight years, and only two of them contain features.
graphicalMCP vs lime: editorial side-by-side
graphicalMCP
0.0ANALYTICS
graphicalMCP is a narrow statistical tool being hardened rather than grown.
◆ Current state
graphicalMCP implements graphical multiple comparison procedures — the method used to control family-wise error across several endpoints in a clinical trial. The package moved under the openpharma organisation in 0.2.6, picked up Hochberg tests and internal validation in 0.2.8, and its most recent release fixes a case where graph testing by closure disagreed with the rejection-based path. Releases are roughly annual and short.
◆ Where it's heading
The changelog reads as a package settling into reference-implementation status: procedure coverage widened once, then the work turned to proving the two computational routes through the same graph agree with each other. That agreement is the whole promise of this kind of tool, since the closure-based calculation is the definition and the rejection-based one is the fast path everyone actually runs. The openpharma move points the same direction — shared maintenance rather than a single author's project.
◆ Prediction
The entries show no feature roadmap, only correctness and validation work, so the next release is most likely another consistency or precision fix rather than a new procedure.
lime
0.0ANALYTICS
The R port of LIME has shipped one commit in three years, and it was an xgboost compatibility patch
◆ Current state
lime is the R implementation of local interpretable model-agnostic explanations, and it is effectively in preservation rather than development. Its last substantive feature release was 0.5.0 in 2019; 0.5.3 in 2022 recorded a maintainer handover and general upkeep; 0.5.4 in December 2025 exists solely to keep the package working across xgboost versions. Six releases span eight years, and only two of them contain features.
◆ Where it's heading
The pattern is upstream-driven survival: every release since 0.5.0 responds to a change in something lime depends on — glmnet's namespace, order() semantics on data frames, xgboost's interface. The one deliberate change in that stretch was moving htmlwidgets, shiny and shinythemes to Suggests, which lightens installation for the majority of users who never open the interactive explainer. Nothing in the feed indicates work on the explanation method itself.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release, whenever it comes, to be another compatibility patch triggered by a dependency change rather than anything touching how explanations are computed. The three-year gaps make timing unpredictable.
Alternatives to graphicalMCP and lime
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either graphicalMCP or lime.
DoseFinding
New stewardship at openpharma, then two releases adding the methods MCP-Mod was missing
webmockr
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
crul
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
dendroNetwork
Six releases, six identical bodies — the feed carries the package abstract instead of release notes
chattr
chattr deleted every LLM integration it had written and outsourced the lot to ellmer
See all graphicalMCP alternatives → · See all lime alternatives →
Recent activity from graphicalMCP and lime
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 4mo agographicalMCPClosure-based and rejection-based graph tests now agree
- 8mo agolimexgboost compatibility restored across versions
- 1y agographicalMCPHochberg tests and internal validation added
- 1y agographicalMCPRepository moved to the openpharma organisation
- 2y agographicalMCPCRAN resubmission housekeeping
- 2y agographicalMCPFirst release of the graphical MCP implementation
- 3y agolimeMaintainer handover and general upkeep
- 5y agolimeShiny dependencies moved to Suggests
- 6y agolimeNamespace fix for glmnet changes
- 7y agolimegower_pow added and lambda aligned with the Python implementation
- 8y agolimeh2o support, NA handling, and date columns held during permutation
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between graphicalMCP and lime?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. graphicalMCP and lime are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is graphicalMCP better than lime?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. graphicalMCP and lime are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to graphicalMCP?
Top graphicalMCP alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "graphicalMCP alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/graphicalmcp for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to lime?
Top lime alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "lime alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/lime for the full list with editorial commentary on each.