← Back to home
Comparison · DevOps

GraphHopper vs TypeDB

A side-by-side editorial comparison of GraphHopper and TypeDB — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

GraphHopper vs TypeDB: at a glance

FeatureGraphHopperTypeDB
SectorDevOpsDevOps
Velocity score2.55.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesrouting, openstreetmap, navigation, security-fixesgraph-database, query-language, data-import, correctness
Last editorial update41m ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is GraphHopper?

GraphHopper 11.1 is a security release, and 12.0 prerelease tags have started.

GraphHopper published 11.1 in October as a security release fixing what it calls critical vulnerabilities, without describing them; the attached change list largely repeats 11.0's OSM tag work, plus items such as trip-based public transit routing, scriptable turn penalties and POST /navigate. Alongside it, 12.0-pre1 and 12.0-pre3 tags and an odd 11.0-alpha1 tag appeared with only commit messages. The roughly yearly major cadence (10.0 in late 2024, 11.0 in October 2025) points at 12.0 as the next major.

Read the full GraphHopper trajectory →

What is TypeDB?

TypeDB 3.14 is spent on import safety and query correctness, not new syntax.

TypeDB went from 3.13.6 to 3.14.1 in a month, skipping a 3.14.0 final. 3.14.1 rejects imported relations that have no role players, which TypeDB can't store and would otherwise lose, fixes a query-plan cache leak that grew without bound during write-only imports, and checkpoints imported databases before serving them to avoid replaying gigabytes of commits. The 3.14 candidates also reworked attribute comparisons, fixing missed answers across value types and turning some runtime panics into compile-time errors.

Read the full TypeDB trajectory →

GraphHopper vs TypeDB: editorial side-by-side

G2.5

GraphHopper 11.1 is a security release, and 12.0 prerelease tags have started.

◆ Current state

GraphHopper published 11.1 in October as a security release fixing what it calls critical vulnerabilities, without describing them; the attached change list largely repeats 11.0's OSM tag work, plus items such as trip-based public transit routing, scriptable turn penalties and POST /navigate. Alongside it, 12.0-pre1 and 12.0-pre3 tags and an odd 11.0-alpha1 tag appeared with only commit messages. The roughly yearly major cadence (10.0 in late 2024, 11.0 in October 2025) points at 12.0 as the next major.

◆ Where it's heading

The engine's recent work is routing quality, reading OSM tags more faithfully per mode, and that continues in the 11.x list. The 12.0 prereleases suggest the next major is in preparation, but their notes give no content. Security disclosure is thin: 11.1 is labelled critical without naming the issue.

◆ Prediction

A 12.0 release is the next likely major entry given the prerelease tags; its contents can't be read from these entries.

T
TypeDB
DEVOPS
5.0

TypeDB 3.14 is spent on import safety and query correctness, not new syntax.

◆ Current state

TypeDB went from 3.13.6 to 3.14.1 in a month, skipping a 3.14.0 final. 3.14.1 rejects imported relations that have no role players, which TypeDB can't store and would otherwise lose, fixes a query-plan cache leak that grew without bound during write-only imports, and checkpoints imported databases before serving them to avoid replaying gigabytes of commits. The 3.14 candidates also reworked attribute comparisons, fixing missed answers across value types and turning some runtime panics into compile-time errors.

◆ Where it's heading

The work since the batch-query given stage in July has moved from capability to correctness. Import and export, which matter for clustered and migrated deployments, are being made safe at scale, and the query planner is being made to return complete answers when types are mixed. 3.13.6 added fully qualified built-in function names as a first step toward namespacing future functions.

◆ Prediction

Expect more built-in functions under a std namespace, since 3.13.6 says most future functions will need it. The rejection of role-player-less relations is described as temporary until an explicit independent annotation for relations exists.

Alternatives to GraphHopper and TypeDB

Other DevOps products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either GraphHopper or TypeDB.

See all GraphHopper alternatives → · See all TypeDB alternatives →

Recent activity from GraphHopper and TypeDB

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 11d agoTypeDBTypeDB 3.14.1
  2. 11d agoGraphHopper11.1 security release for undisclosed critical vulnerabilities
  3. 15d agoTypeDBTypeDB 3.14.0-rc1
  4. 17d agoTypeDBTypeDB 3.14.0-rc0
  5. 1mo agoGraphHopper12.0-pre3 prerelease tag (no notes)
  6. 1mo agoGraphHopperRelease tag adapting to Sonatype publishing
  7. 1mo agoGraphHopper12.0-pre1 prerelease tag (no notes)
  8. 1mo agoTypeDBTypeDB 3.13.6
  9. 1mo agoTypeDBTypeDB 3.13.0
  10. 2mo agoTypeDBTypeDB 3.13.0-rc0
  11. 1y agoGraphHopper11.0 refines mode-specific OSM tag handling and adds POST /navigate
  12. 1y agoGraphHopper10.2 fixes an import failure on recent OSM turn restriction data

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between GraphHopper and TypeDB?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. TypeDB is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is GraphHopper better than TypeDB?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. TypeDB is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other DevOps products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to GraphHopper?

Top GraphHopper alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "GraphHopper alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/graphhopper for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to TypeDB?

Top TypeDB alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "TypeDB alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/typedb for the full list with editorial commentary on each.