rollupTree
The recursive-computation engine under massProps grows the accessors its consumer needed
Comparison · Infra & APIs
gofedf vs rstudio.prefs
A side-by-side editorial comparison of gofedf and rstudio.prefs — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
gofedf vs rstudio.prefs: at a glance
What is gofedf?
A two-test goodness-of-fit package opens itself up to any weight function
gofedf runs goodness-of-fit tests built on the empirical distribution function. Its three releases trace a short, clean arc: existence in 2023, then p-values computed from an analytical solution of the integral equation in 2024, then in 2026 a user-supplied weight function that replaces the fixed menu. Cramer-von Mises and Anderson-Darling are now two points in a family rather than the two options.
What is rstudio.prefs?
Four years dormant, rstudio.prefs returns under a new maintainer.
The package scripts RStudio's own settings — preferences, secondary repositories, keyboard shortcuts — as code you can drop into a project or an onboarding doc. After 0.1.9 in July 2022 it went quiet for four years. 0.2.0 ends that with a maintainer handoff from Daniel D. Sjoberg to S.A. van der Wulp, a shortcut-removal path, and a fix for a corrupted addins.json entry that made reassigned shortcuts fail silently.
gofedf vs rstudio.prefs: editorial side-by-side
gofedf
0.0INFRA · APIS
A two-test goodness-of-fit package opens itself up to any weight function
◆ Current state
gofedf runs goodness-of-fit tests built on the empirical distribution function. Its three releases trace a short, clean arc: existence in 2023, then p-values computed from an analytical solution of the integral equation in 2024, then in 2026 a user-supplied weight function that replaces the fixed menu. Cramer-von Mises and Anderson-Darling are now two points in a family rather than the two options.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is generalising rather than accumulating. Each release removed a hard-coded decision: first how eigenvalues are computed, offering both the analytical route and a matrix approximation; then which weight function defines the statistic at all. The maintainer's own framing in 1.1.0 is a contrast against what earlier versions would not let you do, which is the shape of a package aiming to become a framework.
◆ Prediction
An arbitrary weight function is the extensibility point that matters for EDF tests; what it lacks is calibration guidance, since Type I error behaviour was the argued benefit of the analytical eigenvalue route. Documented recommendations or diagnostics for user-chosen weights are the natural follow-up, though the entries do not announce one.
rstudio.prefs
2.5INFRA · APIS
Four years dormant, rstudio.prefs returns under a new maintainer.
◆ Current state
The package scripts RStudio's own settings — preferences, secondary repositories, keyboard shortcuts — as code you can drop into a project or an onboarding doc. After 0.1.9 in July 2022 it went quiet for four years. 0.2.0 ends that with a maintainer handoff from Daniel D. Sjoberg to S.A. van der Wulp, a shortcut-removal path, and a fix for a corrupted addins.json entry that made reassigned shortcuts fail silently.
◆ Where it's heading
The through-line is teaching every setter how to unset. Secondary repositories got NULL removal back in 0.1.6; 0.2.0 extends the same convention to keyboard shortcuts. Most of the rest of 0.2.0 is arrears — a stale documentation URL that hid preferences such as enable_splash_screen, a deprecated purrr::update_list() call, and check_shortcut_consistency() erroring early on an unknown name.
◆ Prediction
With a new maintainer and refreshed GitHub Actions, the near-term work is likely more catch-up of the same kind: remaining deprecated dependencies and the preference list that fetch_rstudio_prefs() reads from RStudio's docs. Nothing in these notes points past RStudio settings as the scope.
Alternatives to gofedf and rstudio.prefs
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either gofedf or rstudio.prefs.
massProps
A mass-properties rollup spends a year on documentation and follows its sibling's API
writeAlizer
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
samplr
A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months
stochvol
A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed
midr
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses
See all gofedf alternatives → · See all rstudio.prefs alternatives →
Recent activity from gofedf and rstudio.prefs
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 8h agorstudio.prefsShortcut removal, an addins.json fix, and a new maintainer
- 4mo agogofedfUser-supplied weight functions for Cramer-von Mises tests ⚡
- 1y agogofedfp-values from an analytical eigenvalue solution
- 2y agogofedfFirst release of the gofedf package ⚡
- 4y agorstudio.prefsPreferences now read and written through rstudioapi
- 4y agorstudio.prefsConfig files left alone when nothing would change
- 4y agorstudio.prefsSecondary repositories can be deleted again
- 4y agorstudio.prefsRepository removal via NULL; config path helpers exported
- 5y agorstudio.prefsDocumentation, error messages, and array-type caution
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between gofedf and rstudio.prefs?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. rstudio.prefs is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is gofedf better than rstudio.prefs?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. rstudio.prefs is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to gofedf?
Top gofedf alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "gofedf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gofedf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to rstudio.prefs?
Top rstudio.prefs alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rstudio.prefs alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rstudio-prefs for the full list with editorial commentary on each.