← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

Glances vs NetObserv

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Glances and NetObserv — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Glances vs NetObserv: at a glance

FeatureGlancesNetObserv
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score5.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessystem monitoring, security fixes, major version, rest apinetwork-observability, ebpf, kubernetes, bgp
Last editorial update25m ago7d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Glances?

Glances 4.5.9 closes out the 4.x line as a 5.0 beta opens for testing.

Glances 4.5.9 replaces the python-jose library, which carried a CVE, with PyJWT and updates every dependency. The notes say it is the last 4.x release and point users to a Glances 5.0.0 beta on Test PyPI and a dev Docker image. Most 4.5 releases this year were security and correctness fixes.

Read the full Glances trajectory →

What is NetObserv?

NetObserv hit 2.0 without breaking changes, then started renaming its metrics.

NetObserv's operator reached 2.0.0 in September, labelled entirely non-breaking: BGP ASN enrichment through FRRConfiguration CRDs, DNS names in metrics, DNS port configuration in the FlowCollector API, stricter RBAC and network policies for the operator itself, and TLS settings taken from the OpenShift API server. 2.0.1 was fixes and dependency bumps. 2.0.2 fixes ASN labels and IPSec metrics, captures OpenSSL socket tuples at event time in the eBPF agent, and renames filtered_flows_total to filtered_packets_total.

Read the full NetObserv trajectory →

Glances vs NetObserv: editorial side-by-side

G
Glances
ANALYTICS
5.0

Glances 4.5.9 closes out the 4.x line as a 5.0 beta opens for testing.

◆ Current state

Glances 4.5.9 replaces the python-jose library, which carried a CVE, with PyJWT and updates every dependency. The notes say it is the last 4.x release and point users to a Glances 5.0.0 beta on Test PyPI and a dev Docker image. Most 4.5 releases this year were security and correctness fixes.

◆ Where it's heading

After a year of CVE patches and alert correctness work on 4.5, the project is ending the 4.x line and moving to 5.0. The feed does not yet describe what changes in 5.0.

◆ Prediction

Expect further 5.0 betas and then a 5.0.0 release; whether it changes the plugin model, web UI or API is not visible in these entries.

N
NetObserv
ANALYTICS
2.5

NetObserv hit 2.0 without breaking changes, then started renaming its metrics.

◆ Current state

NetObserv's operator reached 2.0.0 in September, labelled entirely non-breaking: BGP ASN enrichment through FRRConfiguration CRDs, DNS names in metrics, DNS port configuration in the FlowCollector API, stricter RBAC and network policies for the operator itself, and TLS settings taken from the OpenShift API server. 2.0.1 was fixes and dependency bumps. 2.0.2 fixes ASN labels and IPSec metrics, captures OpenSSL socket tuples at event time in the eBPF agent, and renames filtered_flows_total to filtered_packets_total.

◆ Where it's heading

The 2.0 line adds routing context (BGP ASNs) and DNS identity to flows, which moves the tool from 'which pod talked to which' toward 'which network and service.' The operator's own security posture, with RBAC, network policies and TLS profiles, is getting as much attention as the data. The TLS thread continues inside the eBPF agent, with OpenSSL tracking narrowed to packet mode in 2.0.2.

◆ Prediction

Expect 2.0.x fixes around the new ASN and TLS enrichment, which both needed corrections in 2.0.2. The metric rename is a signal that dashboards built on older names may need updating in later releases too.

Alternatives to Glances and NetObserv

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Glances or NetObserv.

See all Glances alternatives → · See all NetObserv alternatives →

Recent activity from Glances and NetObserv

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2d agoGlancesGlances 4.5.9
  2. 11d agoNetObserv2.0.2 fixes ASN enrichment and renames a flow metric
  3. 29d agoGlancesGlances 4.5.8
  4. 29d agoGlancesPre-cutover tag before the v4 migration
  5. 1mo agoNetObserv2.0.1 adjusts DNS port defaults and bumps dependencies
  6. 1mo agoGlancesGlances 4.5.7 fixes dozens of wrong or silent alerts
  7. 1mo agoNetObserv2.0.0 adds BGP ASN enrichment and stricter operator RBAC
  8. 3mo agoGlancesCredential leak via URL values in /api/4/config
  9. 3mo agoNetObserv1.12.0 adds TLS alerting, flp-informers and signed releases
  10. 4mo agoNetObserv1.11.5 adds TLS metrics, Kafka compression and drop events
  11. 4mo agoGlancesContainer API latency, ARM GPU monitoring, AMP command-execution fix
  12. 7mo agoNetObservTLS tracking arrives as a feature knob with new TLS fields ⚡

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Glances and NetObserv?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Glances is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Glances better than NetObserv?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Glances is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Glances?

Top Glances alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Glances alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/glances for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to NetObserv?

Top NetObserv alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "NetObserv alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/netobserv for the full list with editorial commentary on each.