Calibre
Calibre MCP lets your coding agent read RUM and Lighthouse data, then fix the slow code
Comparison · Analytics
Glances vs Apache SkyWalking
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Glances and Apache SkyWalking — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Glances vs Apache SkyWalking: at a glance
What is Glances?
Glances 4.5.9 closes out the 4.x line as a 5.0 beta opens for testing.
Glances 4.5.9 replaces the python-jose library, which carried a CVE, with PyJWT and updates every dependency. The notes say it is the last 4.x release and point users to a Glances 5.0.0 beta on Test PyPI and a dev Docker image. Most 4.5 releases this year were security and correctness fixes.
What is Apache SkyWalking?
SkyWalking 11.1 builds service maps from OpenTelemetry traces, no SkyWalking agent required.
Apache SkyWalking spent 2025 and 2026 rebuilding its foundations: BanyanDB replaced H2, the Groovy DSL runtime gave way to ANTLR4 and Javassist, and 11.0.0 split the UI out of the backend. Version 11.1.0, released November 6, stores OTLP traces as they arrive and adds a Trace Analysis Language that turns spans into service, instance and endpoint metrics, topology and dashboards for the databases, caches and queues those services call. Applications instrumented only with OpenTelemetry SDKs now get SkyWalking's dashboards without its agent.
Glances vs Apache SkyWalking: editorial side-by-side
Glances
5.0ANALYTICS
Glances 4.5.9 closes out the 4.x line as a 5.0 beta opens for testing.
◆ Current state
Glances 4.5.9 replaces the python-jose library, which carried a CVE, with PyJWT and updates every dependency. The notes say it is the last 4.x release and point users to a Glances 5.0.0 beta on Test PyPI and a dev Docker image. Most 4.5 releases this year were security and correctness fixes.
◆ Where it's heading
After a year of CVE patches and alert correctness work on 4.5, the project is ending the 4.x line and moving to 5.0. The feed does not yet describe what changes in 5.0.
◆ Prediction
Expect further 5.0 betas and then a 5.0.0 release; whether it changes the plugin model, web UI or API is not visible in these entries.
Apache SkyWalking
3.8ANALYTICS
SkyWalking 11.1 builds service maps from OpenTelemetry traces, no SkyWalking agent required.
◆ Current state
Apache SkyWalking spent 2025 and 2026 rebuilding its foundations: BanyanDB replaced H2, the Groovy DSL runtime gave way to ANTLR4 and Javassist, and 11.0.0 split the UI out of the backend. Version 11.1.0, released November 6, stores OTLP traces as they arrive and adds a Trace Analysis Language that turns spans into service, instance and endpoint metrics, topology and dashboards for the databases, caches and queues those services call. Applications instrumented only with OpenTelemetry SDKs now get SkyWalking's dashboards without its agent.
◆ Where it's heading
After taking storage and runtime in-house, SkyWalking is opening its front door to OpenTelemetry data. Its value is shifting from its own agents toward the analysis it runs on any trace source.
◆ Prediction
Expect more TAL coverage and OpenTelemetry quick starts, with SkyWalking's own agents positioned as optional rather than required.
Alternatives to Glances and Apache SkyWalking
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Glances or Apache SkyWalking.
Dovetail
Dovetail opens its docs to Claude and ChatGPT as co-authors.
OpenReplay
OpenReplay's feed is Helm chart bumps behind its asset-cacher deny list.
Tinybird
Tinybird shrinks its Local image by a third after a run of observability updates.
OpenHouse
OpenHouse tightens view authorization and moves its optimizer schema to Flyway.
Delta Lake
Delta Lake's public stream is Databricks builds and code cleanup on the way to 4.5.
See all Glances alternatives → · See all Apache SkyWalking alternatives →
Recent activity from Glances and Apache SkyWalking
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2d agoGlancesGlances 4.5.9
- 3d agoApache SkyWalking11.1.0 - Metrics and Topology from OTLP Traces ⚡
- 29d agoGlancesGlances 4.5.8
- 29d agoGlancesPre-cutover tag before the v4 migration
- 1mo agoGlancesGlances 4.5.7 fixes dozens of wrong or silent alerts
- 2mo agoApache SkyWalking11.0.0 - Horizon Ready, Runtime Rule Hot-Update and Live DSL Debugger ⚡
- 3mo agoGlancesCredential leak via URL values in /api/4/config
- 4mo agoGlancesContainer API latency, ARM GPU monitoring, AMP command-execution fix
- 7mo agoApache SkyWalking10.4.0 - GenAI Observability, Groovy-Free Runtime and Grafana Tempo Compatible ⚡
- 10mo agoApache SkyWalking10.3.0 - New Trace Model in BanyanDB
- 1y agoApache SkyWalking10.2.0 - No H2, More BanyanDB ⚡
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Glances and Apache SkyWalking?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Glances is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 3.8), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 1. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Glances better than Apache SkyWalking?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Glances is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 3.8), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 1. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Glances?
Top Glances alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Glances alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/glances for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Apache SkyWalking?
Top Apache SkyWalking alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Apache SkyWalking alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/skywalking for the full list with editorial commentary on each.