← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

ggsurvfit vs Holistics

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ggsurvfit and Holistics — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

ggsurvfit vs Holistics: at a glance

FeatureggsurvfitHolistics
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score2.55.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessurvival-analysis, ggplot2, competing-risks, clinical-plotsbusiness-intelligence, ai-governance, data-redaction, analytics-as-code
Last editorial update5d ago4h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ggsurvfit?

ggsurvfit is in correctness-and-compatibility mode, not feature mode.

The package draws survival and cumulative-incidence curves on a ggplot2 grammar, with risk tables, p-values and quantile annotations. Recent releases are entirely fixes and upstream tracking: ggplot2 v4.0.0 compatibility in 2025, and a 2026 patch correcting a Gray-test p-value that could be reported for the wrong competing event.

Read the full ggsurvfit trajectory →

What is Holistics?

Holistics keeps fencing in the AI layer it spent the summer building.

Holistics ships small, frequent notes - often one or two sentences - across three strands: AI features in Explore and Chat, as-code control of presentation through AML, and workspace hygiene like file history and dark mode. The August entries are entirely about the AI layer's edges rather than its capabilities: an AI user attribute for restricting what the assistant can reach, and now redaction of the data it is allowed to see. Bodies are frequently a single line, so scope has to be read from the headline and the release-note URL.

Read the full Holistics trajectory →

ggsurvfit vs Holistics: editorial side-by-side

G
ggsurvfit
ANALYTICS
2.5

ggsurvfit is in correctness-and-compatibility mode, not feature mode.

◆ Current state

The package draws survival and cumulative-incidence curves on a ggplot2 grammar, with risk tables, p-values and quantile annotations. Recent releases are entirely fixes and upstream tracking: ggplot2 v4.0.0 compatibility in 2025, and a 2026 patch correcting a Gray-test p-value that could be reported for the wrong competing event.

◆ Where it's heading

The feature surface settled around 1.0.0, when risk-table alignment was exported and colour and linetype defaults became configurable. Since then the work is keeping pace with survival, ggplot2 and tidycmprsk changes, and closing cases where the plotted curve and the annotation disagreed — the p-value matched by position rather than name, confidence limits swapped for multi-state models, quantiles read off a plateau.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to track upstream survival or ggplot2 changes rather than add plotting features; the CDISC censoring convention adopted in Surv_CNSR() suggests further alignment with clinical data standards is the likelier direction.

Holistics logo
Holistics
ANALYTICS
5.0

Holistics keeps fencing in the AI layer it spent the summer building.

◆ Current state

Holistics ships small, frequent notes - often one or two sentences - across three strands: AI features in Explore and Chat, as-code control of presentation through AML, and workspace hygiene like file history and dark mode. The August entries are entirely about the AI layer's edges rather than its capabilities: an AI user attribute for restricting what the assistant can reach, and now redaction of the data it is allowed to see. Bodies are frequently a single line, so scope has to be read from the headline and the release-note URL.

◆ Where it's heading

The AI work has moved through a recognizable sequence: capability first with chart suggestions, then observability with AI Chat Insights for admins, then access control with an AI-specific user attribute, and now field-level redaction. Access control decides which rows the assistant can reach; redaction decides what it may see inside them - the same governance thread at finer grain. Alongside it, Holistics keeps pulling presentation into AML - custom charts, theme palettes, currency formats - so what analysts used to click is versioned as code.

◆ Prediction

With reach and visibility both now constrained, the remaining gap is accountability - logging what the assistant answered against which data - though the one-line release notes rarely signal scope far enough ahead to read the next step confidently.

Alternatives to ggsurvfit and Holistics

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ggsurvfit or Holistics.

See all ggsurvfit alternatives → · See all Holistics alternatives →

Recent activity from ggsurvfit and Holistics

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3d agoHolisticsAI user attribute restricts AI access to sensitive data
  2. 3d agoHolisticsRedact data exposed to the AI assistant
  3. 17d agoHolisticsCustom currency and unit formats, per field
  4. 20d agoHolisticsFile history: per-file version timeline and restore
  5. 23d agoHolisticsCustom charts become AML code with GUI authoring
  6. 24d agoHolisticsColor palettes can be assigned at the theme level
  7. 26d agoggsurvfitGray-test p-values matched to the plotted outcome by name
  8. 10mo agoggsurvfitggplot2 v4.0.0 compatibility and multi-state CI label fix
  9. 2y agoggsurvfitNegative follow-up times and a cloglog transformation
  10. 2y agoggsurvfitAesthetic defaults become switchable and alignment is exported
  11. 2y agoggsurvfitConfidence limits corrected for monotonicity-reversing transforms
  12. 3y agoggsurvfitGlue syntax in risk tables and coxph model support

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ggsurvfit and Holistics?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Holistics is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ggsurvfit better than Holistics?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Holistics is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ggsurvfit?

Top ggsurvfit alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggsurvfit alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggsurvfit for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Holistics?

Top Holistics alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Holistics alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/holistics for the full list with editorial commentary on each.