← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

ggquiver vs rempsyc

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ggquiver and rempsyc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

ggquiver vs rempsyc: at a glance

Featureggquiverrempsyc
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesggplot2 extension, vector fields, data visualization, coordinate systemsapa-formatting, psychology-research, statistical-tables, ggplot2
Last editorial update2h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ggquiver?

ggquiver returned after four years to make arrows respect ggplot's own scales.

A small ggplot2 extension for quiver and vector-field plots. The 0.3.x line in late 2021 was about making arrows behave correctly outside plain Cartesian coordinates — non-Cartesian coordinate systems, ggmap backgrounds, arrow sizing and angles. Then nothing for over four years, until 0.4.0 made arrows honour scale transformations on the x and y aesthetics and exposed grid::arrow()'s appearance options.

Read the full ggquiver trajectory →

What is rempsyc?

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

Read the full rempsyc trajectory →

ggquiver vs rempsyc: editorial side-by-side

G
ggquiver
ANALYTICS
0.0

ggquiver returned after four years to make arrows respect ggplot's own scales.

◆ Current state

A small ggplot2 extension for quiver and vector-field plots. The 0.3.x line in late 2021 was about making arrows behave correctly outside plain Cartesian coordinates — non-Cartesian coordinate systems, ggmap backgrounds, arrow sizing and angles. Then nothing for over four years, until 0.4.0 made arrows honour scale transformations on the x and y aesthetics and exposed grid::arrow()'s appearance options.

◆ Where it's heading

The consistent theme across both eras is deferring to ggplot2 rather than drawing on top of it: coordinate systems first, then scale transformations, then arrow styling handed to grid. Development is episodic — years pass, then a release that closes the gap between what the geom does and what a user expects from any other layer. The changelog is entirely correctness and integration work; there is no sign of the package growing new plot types.

◆ Prediction

The entries only support a narrow read: further releases will likely keep closing ggplot2 integration gaps as they are reported, but the four-year gap means cadence is not predictable from this feed.

R
rempsyc
ANALYTICS
0.0

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

◆ Current state

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

◆ Where it's heading

Two forces drive this package and neither is its own roadmap. The first is APA style: when the 7th edition advised against beta for standardized coefficients, the package switched its output to italic b with an asterisk. The second is the surrounding ecosystem — formatting is aligned to what lavaanExtra and afex produce, contrast handling was delegated to easystats' modelbased, and Excel correlation matrix export was handed entirely to the correlation package to cut maintenance.

◆ Prediction

The pattern of delegating functionality to specialist packages while keeping the formatting layer is well established and likely continues. Because releases bundle many small dev versions, the next one will probably again mix plotting refinements with fixes surfaced by upstream changes.

Alternatives to ggquiver and rempsyc

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ggquiver or rempsyc.

See all ggquiver alternatives → · See all rempsyc alternatives →

Recent activity from ggquiver and rempsyc

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 6mo agoggquiverArrows respect scale transformations and grid arrow styling
  2. 11mo agorempsycPoint labels and per-group correlations added to nice_scatter
  3. 1y agorempsycExcel correlation export delegated to the correlation package
  4. 2y agorempsycTable spacing control and a fix for name collision with afex
  5. 2y agorempsycStandardized coefficients switch to APA 7th edition b* notation
  6. 2y agorempsycLegend and standardization-check fixes
  7. 2y agorempsycnice_table starts coercing model objects automatically
  8. 4y agoggquiverArrow scaling and centered-arrow angle fixes
  9. 4y agoggquiverFix for resized vectors via vecsize
  10. 4y agoggquiverNon-Cartesian coordinates and ggmap backgrounds supported

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ggquiver and rempsyc?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ggquiver and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ggquiver better than rempsyc?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ggquiver and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ggquiver?

Top ggquiver alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggquiver alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggquiver for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rempsyc?

Top rempsyc alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rempsyc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rempsyc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.