← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

ggmapinset vs rempsyc

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ggmapinset and rempsyc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:ggplot2

ggmapinset vs rempsyc: at a glance

Featureggmapinsetrempsyc
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesggplot2, geospatial, inset-maps, extension-apiapa-formatting, psychology-research, statistical-tables, ggplot2
Last editorial update3h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ggmapinset?

A ggplot2 inset-map extension that is now infrastructure for other packages

ggmapinset adds magnified inset panels to ggplot2 sf maps, handling the coordinate transformation, the inset frame and the sf-related stat layers that have to follow it. The 0.5.0 release is aimed less at end users than at extension authors: coerce_centre() is a new extension point required by sibling package ggautomap, and the inset parameter drops NA in favour of waiver() as its default. It comes from cidm-ph, alongside nswgeo.

Read the full ggmapinset trajectory →

What is rempsyc?

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

Read the full rempsyc trajectory →

ggmapinset vs rempsyc: editorial side-by-side

G
ggmapinset
ANALYTICS
0.0

A ggplot2 inset-map extension that is now infrastructure for other packages

◆ Current state

ggmapinset adds magnified inset panels to ggplot2 sf maps, handling the coordinate transformation, the inset frame and the sf-related stat layers that have to follow it. The 0.5.0 release is aimed less at end users than at extension authors: coerce_centre() is a new extension point required by sibling package ggautomap, and the inset parameter drops NA in favour of waiver() as its default. It comes from cidm-ph, alongside nswgeo.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has moved steadily from feature to foundation. 0.3.0 replaced confusing parameter names and rebuilt everything on stat_sf_inset() so coordinate limits stayed correct, then exposed transform_to_inset() explicitly for extension developers. 0.4.0 generalised inset shapes beyond circles to rectangles and arbitrary sf geometries. 0.5.0 continues in that direction, changing defaults in ways that require downstream extensions to adapt — the cost of being depended upon.

◆ Prediction

Expect further extension points driven by what ggautomap and the other cidm-ph mapping packages need, with the user-facing inset API staying largely settled after the shape generalisation.

R
rempsyc
ANALYTICS
0.0

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

◆ Current state

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

◆ Where it's heading

Two forces drive this package and neither is its own roadmap. The first is APA style: when the 7th edition advised against beta for standardized coefficients, the package switched its output to italic b with an asterisk. The second is the surrounding ecosystem — formatting is aligned to what lavaanExtra and afex produce, contrast handling was delegated to easystats' modelbased, and Excel correlation matrix export was handed entirely to the correlation package to cut maintenance.

◆ Prediction

The pattern of delegating functionality to specialist packages while keeping the formatting layer is well established and likely continues. Because releases bundle many small dev versions, the next one will probably again mix plotting refinements with fixes surfaced by upstream changes.

Alternatives to ggmapinset and rempsyc

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ggmapinset or rempsyc.

See all ggmapinset alternatives → · See all rempsyc alternatives →

Recent activity from ggmapinset and rempsyc

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4mo agoggmapinsetNew extension point for ggautomap; waiver() replaces NA
  2. 11mo agorempsycPoint labels and per-group correlations added to nice_scatter
  3. 1y agorempsycExcel correlation export delegated to the correlation package
  4. 1y agoggmapinsetRectangular and arbitrary sf inset shapes
  5. 2y agorempsycTable spacing control and a fix for name collision with afex
  6. 2y agorempsycStandardized coefficients switch to APA 7th edition b* notation
  7. 2y agorempsycLegend and standardization-check fixes
  8. 2y agorempsycnice_table starts coercing model objects automatically
  9. 3y agoggmapinsetRebuilt on stat_sf_inset() with corrected coordinate limits

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ggmapinset and rempsyc?

Both compete on the same themes — ggplot2 — within Analytics. ggmapinset and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ggmapinset better than rempsyc?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ggmapinset and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ggmapinset?

Top ggmapinset alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggmapinset alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggmapinset for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rempsyc?

Top rempsyc alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rempsyc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rempsyc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.