mice
mice can finally predict, not just estimate, from multiply imputed data.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
GeoThinneR vs PowerTOST
A side-by-side editorial comparison of GeoThinneR and PowerTOST — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
GeoThinneR vs PowerTOST: at a glance
What is GeoThinneR?
Spatial thinning grows a result object, and the API breaks to make room for it
GeoThinneR removes spatially redundant occurrence records before species distribution modelling. Version 2.0.0 restructured it around a GeoThinned S3 class with print, summary, plot and trial-accessor methods, replacing the bare logical vectors earlier versions returned, and reorganised the methods into three named strategies — distance, grid and precision — with the search algorithm as a separate argument. The two releases since have added a priority system for choosing which of several tied points to drop.
What is PowerTOST?
A bioequivalence sample-size workhorse whose news is which regulator it now covers
PowerTOST computes power and sample size for bioequivalence and its changelog reads as a record of regulatory divergence more than statistical development. Version 1.5-3 added the Gulf Co-operation Council as a regulator setting; 1.5-4 and 1.5-6 stripped 'FDA' out of the narrow-therapeutic-index function names once China's CDE began requiring the same evaluation. The most recent release, 1.5-7, is a single fix to how nvec() splits a total sample size across sequences.
GeoThinneR vs PowerTOST: editorial side-by-side
GeoThinneR
0.0INFRA · APIS
Spatial thinning grows a result object, and the API breaks to make room for it
◆ Current state
GeoThinneR removes spatially redundant occurrence records before species distribution modelling. Version 2.0.0 restructured it around a GeoThinned S3 class with print, summary, plot and trial-accessor methods, replacing the bare logical vectors earlier versions returned, and reorganised the methods into three named strategies — distance, grid and precision — with the search algorithm as a separate argument. The two releases since have added a priority system for choosing which of several tied points to drop.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is moving from a function that returns an answer to a tool that returns something you can interrogate. Multiple thinning trials are first-class — you can ask for the largest, fetch a specific one, summarise one — and the recent work is about making the choice among tied candidates controllable rather than random. Dependency discipline runs alongside: the R-tree method was dropped when its package was not on CRAN, and spatial coverage degrades to NA rather than failing when s2 is missing.
◆ Prediction
The priority mechanism now covers all three strategies and the last release was an overflow fix in the local kd-tree path at large sizes, so scale is where the pressure is. More work on the distance methods at large N is the likelier next step than another strategy.
PowerTOST
0.0INFRA · APIS
A bioequivalence sample-size workhorse whose news is which regulator it now covers
◆ Current state
PowerTOST computes power and sample size for bioequivalence and its changelog reads as a record of regulatory divergence more than statistical development. Version 1.5-3 added the Gulf Co-operation Council as a regulator setting; 1.5-4 and 1.5-6 stripped 'FDA' out of the narrow-therapeutic-index function names once China's CDE began requiring the same evaluation. The most recent release, 1.5-7, is a single fix to how nvec() splits a total sample size across sequences.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is in long maintenance with a widening regulatory surface: the statistical methods are settled, and releases arrive when an agency publishes a framework that can be expressed as a settings variant of an existing method. Function naming has been deliberately decoupled from any single agency, with the deprecated FDA-suffixed aliases carried for years before removal. Cadence has slowed to roughly one release every eighteen months.
◆ Prediction
The next release is most likely another regulator setting or a small fix; on the deprecation notice already given, the power.NTIDFDA()-style aliases are the obvious removal candidate.
Alternatives to GeoThinneR and PowerTOST
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either GeoThinneR or PowerTOST.
PINstimation
A market-microstructure toolkit that keeps adding estimators as the papers land.
nzilbb.vowels
A vowel-analysis package trimming dependencies after an email address got it archived.
emuR
The R half of the EMU speech database system, fixing what was quietly broken.
BAS
A Bayesian model-averaging package spending its 2.0 on memory, not methods.
tidyplots
tidyplots keeps rebuilding its own foundations rather than layering around them.
See all GeoThinneR alternatives → · See all PowerTOST alternatives →
Recent activity from GeoThinneR and PowerTOST
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 5mo agoGeoThinneRInteger overflow in local kd-tree grid assignment
- 8mo agoGeoThinneRPriority-based tie-breaking across all thinning methods
- 10mo agoPowerTOSTFix for splitting total sample size across sequences
- 1y agoGeoThinneRGeoThinned result objects and a reorganised method surface ⚡
- 1y agoGeoThinneRR-tree thinning removed with its off-CRAN dependency
- 2y agoPowerTOSTNTID functions renamed off the FDA acronym; GCC guidance in vignettes
- 4y agoPowerTOSTpower.NTID() aliases added; FDA-suffixed names deprecated
- 5y agoPowerTOSTGulf Co-operation Council added as a regulator setting
- 5y agoPowerTOSTMaintenance release with vignette and documentation clarifications
- 5y agoPowerTOSTstringsAsFactors fix for older R in a vignette example
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between GeoThinneR and PowerTOST?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. GeoThinneR and PowerTOST are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is GeoThinneR better than PowerTOST?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. GeoThinneR and PowerTOST are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to GeoThinneR?
Top GeoThinneR alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "GeoThinneR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/geothinner for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to PowerTOST?
Top PowerTOST alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "PowerTOST alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/powertost for the full list with editorial commentary on each.