dowhy
DoWhy adds one estimation method a year and keeps its identification edge.
Comparison · Analytics
Fulcrum vs statsmodels
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Fulcrum and statsmodels — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Fulcrum vs statsmodels: at a glance
| Feature | Fulcrum | statsmodels |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Analytics | Analytics |
| Velocity score | 6.3 | 0.0 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 0 |
| Top themes | field-data-collection, esri-arcgis, offline-maps, mobile-releases | statistics, python, compatibility, maintenance |
| Last editorial update | 15h ago | 1h ago |
| Website | — | Visit → |
What is Fulcrum?
Fulcrum is consolidating on Esri, with Google Maps gone September 1
The mapping stack is the whole story right now: ArcGIS SDK 300.0.0 on iOS, the latest ArcGIS and deck.gl on web, and a hard cutover date after which any organization still defaulting to Google Maps is switched to Esri automatically. The mobile releases in this window are almost entirely map and location fixes — basemap loading, offline symbol styling, location resolution that blocked saves. On-device inference quietly changed format, dropping ONNX.
What is statsmodels?
statsmodels ships only what the ecosystem breaks — six releases, no new statistics.
Every release in this window is a compatibility release. 0.14.2 and 0.14.3 absorbed NumPy 2, 0.14.5 fixed an import failure caused by SciPy 1.16, and 0.14.6 did the same for pandas 3.0. The only additive change across two years is Pyodide support in 0.14.4, described in its own notes as one feature and no fixes. A 0.15.0.dev0 tag exists from 2023 and has not been followed by a 0.15 release.
Fulcrum vs statsmodels: editorial side-by-side
Fulcrum
6.3ANALYTICS
Fulcrum is consolidating on Esri, with Google Maps gone September 1
◆ Current state
The mapping stack is the whole story right now: ArcGIS SDK 300.0.0 on iOS, the latest ArcGIS and deck.gl on web, and a hard cutover date after which any organization still defaulting to Google Maps is switched to Esri automatically. The mobile releases in this window are almost entirely map and location fixes — basemap loading, offline symbol styling, location resolution that blocked saves. On-device inference quietly changed format, dropping ONNX.
◆ Where it's heading
One platform bet runs through everything: Esri as the single map engine, with Google's satellite, hybrid, and street imagery retained as basemap options so the migration costs users imagery choice, not capability. The current release cadence is stabilization work paying down that migration rather than new ground.
◆ Prediction
Expect map and location fixes to keep dominating releases through the September 1 cutover, with the Esri-only capabilities already listed — snapping, ArcGIS Feature Service connectivity, offline basemaps — becoming the default surface rather than the alternative one.
statsmodels
0.0ANALYTICS
statsmodels ships only what the ecosystem breaks — six releases, no new statistics.
◆ Current state
Every release in this window is a compatibility release. 0.14.2 and 0.14.3 absorbed NumPy 2, 0.14.5 fixed an import failure caused by SciPy 1.16, and 0.14.6 did the same for pandas 3.0. The only additive change across two years is Pyodide support in 0.14.4, described in its own notes as one feature and no fixes. A 0.15.0.dev0 tag exists from 2023 and has not been followed by a 0.15 release.
◆ Where it's heading
The library is being kept alive rather than developed: each release answers a break introduced upstream, and the interval between them is set by the NumPy, SciPy and pandas release calendars rather than by anything statsmodels is building. Two consecutive releases whose stated purpose was restoring the ability to import the package is the sharpest available signal about maintainer bandwidth. The 0.15 line remains a dev tag with no visible progress toward a release.
◆ Prediction
The next release is most likely another compatibility patch triggered by a NumPy, SciPy or pandas major, and nothing in these entries indicates 0.15 is close.
Alternatives to Fulcrum and statsmodels
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Fulcrum or statsmodels.
OpenHouse
OpenHouse is hardening the seams where table policies and jobs quietly fail.
silx
silx 3.0 moved its default Qt binding to PySide6 — a migration for everyone embedding it.
StatsBase.jl
StatsBase.jl is in caretaker mode — correctness fixes in, dependency bumps out.
iris
Iris ships steadily on a two-a-year cadence, but its feed publishes only pointers.
shiny
Shiny made reactive apps observable, then gave them a way to tear themselves down
See all Fulcrum alternatives → · See all statsmodels alternatives →
Recent activity from Fulcrum and statsmodels
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 22h agoFulcrumiOS fix for slow location resolution blocking saves
- 5d agoFulcrumMap engine updated to the latest ArcGIS and deck.gl
- 6d agoFulcrumAndroid stability fixes for ArcGIS location and signatures
- 6d agoFulcrumiOS basemap loading and map-centering fixes
- 7d agoFulcrumArcGIS SDK 300.0.0 lands; ONNX inference support removed
- 7d agoFulcrumOffline ArcGIS layers keep custom symbols and labels
- 8mo agostatsmodels0.14.6: restores importing under pandas 3.0
- 1y agostatsmodels0.14.5: restores importing under SciPy 1.16
- 1y agostatsmodels0.14.4: Pyodide support
- 1y agostatsmodels0.14.3: NumPy 2 environments and corrected macOS builds
- 2y agostatsmodels0.14.2: full NumPy 2 compatibility
- 2y agostatsmodelsRelease 0.14.1
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Fulcrum and statsmodels?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Fulcrum is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Fulcrum better than statsmodels?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Fulcrum is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Fulcrum?
Top Fulcrum alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Fulcrum alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fulcrum for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to statsmodels?
Top statsmodels alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "statsmodels alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/statsmodels for the full list with editorial commentary on each.