← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

Fulcrum vs procs

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Fulcrum and procs — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Fulcrum vs procs: at a glance

FeatureFulcrumprocs
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score6.30.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesgis, esri-migration, offline-maps, field-data-capturestatistics, sas-migration, r-package, clinical-reporting
Last editorial update4h ago3d ago
WebsiteVisit →

What is Fulcrum?

Fulcrum is betting its whole map stack on Esri, with a hard Google Maps cutoff on September 1.

Fulcrum is a field data collection platform, and nearly every entry in the last month touches mapping. The web app ships weekly fix batches for layer rendering (KML/KMZ, MBTiles, ArcGIS Feature Services), while iOS and Android push near-weekly builds against the ArcGIS SDK. The newest iOS build turns to app-level responsiveness - database queries moved off the main path and the record editor kept interactive while Photo FastFill works in the background.

Read the full Fulcrum trajectory →

What is procs?

An R package rebuilding SAS procedures one PROC at a time, now filling in their options.

procs reimplements SAS statistical procedures — FREQ, MEANS, TTEST, REG, SORT, TRANSPOSE — as R functions returning both datasets and report-ready output, as part of the r-sassy suite. The catalogue of procedures is largely assembled; recent releases concentrate on the parameters each one accepts rather than on adding new procedures. Validation documentation is maintained alongside the code, consistent with the regulated environments the suite targets.

Read the full procs trajectory →

Fulcrum vs procs: editorial side-by-side

F
Fulcrum
ANALYTICS
6.3

Fulcrum is betting its whole map stack on Esri, with a hard Google Maps cutoff on September 1.

◆ Current state

Fulcrum is a field data collection platform, and nearly every entry in the last month touches mapping. The web app ships weekly fix batches for layer rendering (KML/KMZ, MBTiles, ArcGIS Feature Services), while iOS and Android push near-weekly builds against the ArcGIS SDK. The newest iOS build turns to app-level responsiveness - database queries moved off the main path and the record editor kept interactive while Photo FastFill works in the background.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is a full consolidation onto Esri. The legacy Google Maps engine retires on September 1 with automatic migration for anyone who has not switched, and Esri now carries Google's satellite and street basemaps so the imagery argument is neutralized. Underneath, the mobile SDK moved to ArcGIS 300.0.0 and ONNX on-device inference gave way to a new INFERENCE format. Two capabilities are visibly staged behind early access rather than shipped: Photo FastFill, and a GPS integration still described as Alpha.

◆ Prediction

Expect the weeks before September 1 to stay dominated by migration-shaped fixes and Esri parity work, with Photo FastFill the nearer of the two early-access programs to general availability given it is already running in shipped builds.

P
procs
ANALYTICS
0.0

An R package rebuilding SAS procedures one PROC at a time, now filling in their options.

◆ Current state

procs reimplements SAS statistical procedures — FREQ, MEANS, TTEST, REG, SORT, TRANSPOSE — as R functions returning both datasets and report-ready output, as part of the r-sassy suite. The catalogue of procedures is largely assembled; recent releases concentrate on the parameters each one accepts rather than on adding new procedures. Validation documentation is maintained alongside the code, consistent with the regulated environments the suite targets.

◆ Where it's heading

The work has shifted from breadth to fidelity: where earlier releases introduced whole procedures, recent ones add the options a SAS user expects to find on them, most visibly the where parameter spread across five functions at once and plotting support across three. Statistical output is being widened too, with AIC and adjusted Chi-Square appearing. The remaining gap is per-procedure option coverage rather than missing procedures.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued option-level parity work on the existing procedures, with new statistics added to their output tables, rather than a new proc_* function.

Alternatives to Fulcrum and procs

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Fulcrum or procs.

See all Fulcrum alternatives → · See all procs alternatives →

Recent activity from Fulcrum and procs

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agoFulcrumiOS: async database queries, non-blocking Photo FastFill
  2. 5d agoFulcrumWeb fixes: shared-view exports, MBTiles popups, KML and ArcGIS layers
  3. 7d agoFulcrumAndroid: update offline map layers in place, non-blocking Photo FastFill
  4. 8d agoFulcrumiOS fix: slow location resolution blocked record saves
  5. 13d agoFulcrumWeb: SSO email wording and ArcGIS/deck.gl version bumps
  6. 14d agoFulcrumAndroid fixes: ArcGIS stability, signature button, photo markup
  7. 2mo agoprocsproc_ttest() gains sides, freq and weight parameters
  8. 4mo agoprocsA where parameter arrives across five procedures
  9. 9mo agoprocsAdjusted Chi-Square added, altering the proc_freq() table
  10. 2y agoprocsproc_reg() added for regression
  11. 2y agoprocsOrdered-factor handling fixed across three procedures
  12. 2y agoprocsproc_ttest() added, plus factor casting on proc_sort()

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Fulcrum and procs?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Fulcrum is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Fulcrum better than procs?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Fulcrum is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Fulcrum?

Top Fulcrum alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Fulcrum alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fulcrum for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to procs?

Top procs alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "procs alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/procs for the full list with editorial commentary on each.