← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

Fulcrum vs ichimoku

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Fulcrum and ichimoku — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Fulcrum vs ichimoku: at a glance

FeatureFulcrumichimoku
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score6.30.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesgis, esri-migration, offline-maps, field-data-capturefinancial-charting, technical-analysis, dependency-reduction, oanda
Last editorial update7h ago4d ago
WebsiteVisit →

What is Fulcrum?

Fulcrum is betting its whole map stack on Esri, with a hard Google Maps cutoff on September 1.

Fulcrum is a field data collection platform, and nearly every entry in the last month touches mapping. The web app ships weekly fix batches for layer rendering (KML/KMZ, MBTiles, ArcGIS Feature Services), while iOS and Android push near-weekly builds against the ArcGIS SDK. The newest iOS build turns to app-level responsiveness - database queries moved off the main path and the record editor kept interactive while Photo FastFill works in the background.

Read the full Fulcrum trajectory →

What is ichimoku?

A cloud-chart package quietly swapping its dependencies for its maintainer's own libraries.

ichimoku implements Ichimoku Kinko Hyo cloud charts, strategy backtesting and an OANDA data interface for R. Recent releases are almost entirely plumbing: 1.5.7 drops RcppSimdJson in favor of secretbase for JSON parsing, following earlier releases that moved hashing to secretbase and raised the nanonext and mirai floors. The charting and strategy surface has been stable since the 1.5.0 line.

Read the full ichimoku trajectory →

Fulcrum vs ichimoku: editorial side-by-side

F
Fulcrum
ANALYTICS
6.3

Fulcrum is betting its whole map stack on Esri, with a hard Google Maps cutoff on September 1.

◆ Current state

Fulcrum is a field data collection platform, and nearly every entry in the last month touches mapping. The web app ships weekly fix batches for layer rendering (KML/KMZ, MBTiles, ArcGIS Feature Services), while iOS and Android push near-weekly builds against the ArcGIS SDK. The newest iOS build turns to app-level responsiveness - database queries moved off the main path and the record editor kept interactive while Photo FastFill works in the background.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is a full consolidation onto Esri. The legacy Google Maps engine retires on September 1 with automatic migration for anyone who has not switched, and Esri now carries Google's satellite and street basemaps so the imagery argument is neutralized. Underneath, the mobile SDK moved to ArcGIS 300.0.0 and ONNX on-device inference gave way to a new INFERENCE format. Two capabilities are visibly staged behind early access rather than shipped: Photo FastFill, and a GPS integration still described as Alpha.

◆ Prediction

Expect the weeks before September 1 to stay dominated by migration-shaped fixes and Esri parity work, with Photo FastFill the nearer of the two early-access programs to general availability given it is already running in shipped builds.

I
ichimoku
ANALYTICS
0.0

A cloud-chart package quietly swapping its dependencies for its maintainer's own libraries.

◆ Current state

ichimoku implements Ichimoku Kinko Hyo cloud charts, strategy backtesting and an OANDA data interface for R. Recent releases are almost entirely plumbing: 1.5.7 drops RcppSimdJson in favor of secretbase for JSON parsing, following earlier releases that moved hashing to secretbase and raised the nanonext and mirai floors. The charting and strategy surface has been stable since the 1.5.0 line.

◆ Where it's heading

The visible arc is consolidation onto the maintainer's own package family — secretbase for hashing and now JSON, nanonext and mirai for concurrency — which steadily removes third-party and Rcpp-based dependencies from the install chain. Feature work is sporadic and narrow when it comes: a faster POSIXct formatter exported as a utility, a multi-session option for the Shiny app, and a fix for asymmetric strategies that failed to emit a final entry signal.

◆ Prediction

Expect further dependency consolidation as the sibling packages gain capabilities, with ichimoku adopting them shortly after release rather than shipping new charting features.

Alternatives to Fulcrum and ichimoku

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Fulcrum or ichimoku.

See all Fulcrum alternatives → · See all ichimoku alternatives →

Recent activity from Fulcrum and ichimoku

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agoFulcrumiOS: async database queries, non-blocking Photo FastFill
  2. 5d agoFulcrumWeb fixes: shared-view exports, MBTiles popups, KML and ArcGIS layers
  3. 7d agoFulcrumAndroid: update offline map layers in place, non-blocking Photo FastFill
  4. 8d agoFulcrumiOS fix: slow location resolution blocked record saves
  5. 13d agoFulcrumWeb: SSO email wording and ArcGIS/deck.gl version bumps
  6. 14d agoFulcrumAndroid fixes: ArcGIS stability, signature button, photo markup
  7. 2mo agoichimokuJSON parsing moves from RcppSimdJson to secretbase
  8. 1y agoichimokuFaster POSIXct formatting exported as a utility
  9. 1y agoichimokuMultiple concurrent sessions in the OANDA Shiny app
  10. 2y agoichimokuAsymmetric strategies now emit their final entry signal
  11. 2y agoichimokusecretbase floor raised to 1.0.0
  12. 2y agoichimokuArchive verification reverts to SHA256

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Fulcrum and ichimoku?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Fulcrum is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Fulcrum better than ichimoku?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Fulcrum is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Fulcrum?

Top Fulcrum alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Fulcrum alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fulcrum for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to ichimoku?

Top ichimoku alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ichimoku alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ichimoku for the full list with editorial commentary on each.