← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

Fulcrum vs gtsummary

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Fulcrum and gtsummary — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Fulcrum vs gtsummary: at a glance

FeatureFulcrumgtsummary
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score6.30.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesgis, esri-migration, offline-maps, field-data-captureclinical-tables, analysis-results-data, regression-summaries, reproducible-reporting
Last editorial update10h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →

What is Fulcrum?

Fulcrum is betting its whole map stack on Esri, with a hard Google Maps cutoff on September 1.

Fulcrum is a field data collection platform, and nearly every entry in the last month touches mapping. The web app ships weekly fix batches for layer rendering (KML/KMZ, MBTiles, ArcGIS Feature Services), while iOS and Android push near-weekly builds against the ArcGIS SDK. Feature work is thin right now; the visible surface is stabilization around a mapping engine migration already in flight.

Read the full Fulcrum trajectory →

What is gtsummary?

gtsummary is quietly rebuilding itself around analysis results data, one table verb at a time.

gtsummary builds publication-ready summary, regression and survival tables for clinical and epidemiological work. Across this window it has grown in two directions at once: table composition primitives — splitting tables by rows and columns, stacking with labeled IDs, nested strata stacks, flexible merge columns — and a steadily deepening ARD layer, where tbl_ard_* functions, gather_ard() and the hierarchical table family expose the underlying analysis results data as a first-class object.

Read the full gtsummary trajectory →

Fulcrum vs gtsummary: editorial side-by-side

F
Fulcrum
ANALYTICS
6.3

Fulcrum is betting its whole map stack on Esri, with a hard Google Maps cutoff on September 1.

◆ Current state

Fulcrum is a field data collection platform, and nearly every entry in the last month touches mapping. The web app ships weekly fix batches for layer rendering (KML/KMZ, MBTiles, ArcGIS Feature Services), while iOS and Android push near-weekly builds against the ArcGIS SDK. Feature work is thin right now; the visible surface is stabilization around a mapping engine migration already in flight.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is a full consolidation onto Esri. The legacy Google Maps engine is being retired on September 1 with automatic migration for anyone who hasn't switched, and Esri now carries Google's satellite and street basemaps so the imagery argument is neutralized. Underneath, the mobile SDK moved to ArcGIS 300.0.0 and ONNX on-device inference was dropped for a new INFERENCE format with labels.txt support. Offline is the second thread: downloadable layers can now be updated in place rather than deleted and recreated.

◆ Prediction

Expect the weeks before September 1 to stay dominated by migration-shaped fixes and Esri feature parity work, with the MMPK layer and Photo FastFill early-access programs the most likely to graduate to general availability next.

G
gtsummary
ANALYTICS
0.0

gtsummary is quietly rebuilding itself around analysis results data, one table verb at a time.

◆ Current state

gtsummary builds publication-ready summary, regression and survival tables for clinical and epidemiological work. Across this window it has grown in two directions at once: table composition primitives — splitting tables by rows and columns, stacking with labeled IDs, nested strata stacks, flexible merge columns — and a steadily deepening ARD layer, where tbl_ard_* functions, gather_ard() and the hierarchical table family expose the underlying analysis results data as a first-class object.

◆ Where it's heading

The ARD work is the through-line. Table IDs exist so gather_ard() can return a named list; hierarchical tables gained per-level sorting and targeted filtering; ARD inputs are pre-processed so sorting applies to non-standard shapes. The package is becoming a structured-results engine that happens to render tables, rather than a renderer alone. Alongside that, 2.2.0 restored data pre-processing that 2.0 had removed after the reduced functionality hurt users — a maintainer willing to reverse a major-version decision.

◆ Prediction

Expect the hierarchical and ARD functions, introduced as a preview without a full deprecation cycle, to keep stabilizing toward a settled API rather than new table types appearing.

Alternatives to Fulcrum and gtsummary

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Fulcrum or gtsummary.

See all Fulcrum alternatives → · See all gtsummary alternatives →

Recent activity from Fulcrum and gtsummary

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 19h agoFulcrumWeb fixes: shared-view exports, MBTiles popups, KML and ArcGIS layers
  2. 3d agoFulcrumAndroid: update offline map layers in place, non-blocking Photo FastFill
  3. 4d agoFulcrumiOS fix: slow location resolution blocked record saves
  4. 8d agoFulcrumWeb: SSO email wording and ArcGIS/deck.gl version bumps
  5. 10d agoFulcrumAndroid fixes: ArcGIS stability, signature button, photo markup
  6. 10d agoFulcrumiOS fixes: basemap loading and black map screen
  7. 2mo agogtsummaryTheme elements no longer evaluated by default
  8. 8mo agogtsummaryARD strata functions and finer theme control
  9. 11mo agogtsummaryPer-level hierarchical sorting and labeled stacking
  10. 1y agogtsummaryTable splitting, ID labeling, and add_difference_row
  11. 1y agogtsummaryData pre-processing restored after the 2.0 removal
  12. 1y agogtsummarytbl_merge gains explicit merge columns

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Fulcrum and gtsummary?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Fulcrum is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Fulcrum better than gtsummary?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Fulcrum is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Fulcrum?

Top Fulcrum alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Fulcrum alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fulcrum for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to gtsummary?

Top gtsummary alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "gtsummary alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gtsummary-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.