← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

forestly vs osmapiR

A side-by-side editorial comparison of forestly and osmapiR — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-language

forestly vs osmapiR: at a glance

FeatureforestlyosmapiR
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesclinical-safety, adverse-events, data-visualization, r-languageopenstreetmap, api-client, r-language, geospatial
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is forestly?

forestly built an interactive safety review tool, then taught it to produce submission-ready RTF.

forestly renders adverse-event forest plots as interactive reactable widgets — filterable by AE category, with sliders for incidence thresholds and a toggle for the risk-difference column. Version 0.1.3 added `rtf_static_forestly()` for static RTF output, and 0.1.4 has been about giving the display owner control over what reviewers see: the CSV download button, the AE filter label, and the diff toggle can each be switched off.

Read the full forestly trajectory →

What is osmapiR?

osmapiR is the rare API client that tracks its server's wiki revision numbers in the changelog.

osmapiR wraps the full OpenStreetMap API from R — reading and writing map data, changesets, notes, GPX traces and user records — with OAuth2 where the endpoint requires it, pagination handled internally, and atomic calls vectorised. Recent releases have filled in the moderation and social surface: note subscription, user blocks, changeset discussion search. The newest release lets `bbox` arguments arrive as a character string, matrix, vector, an sf `bbox`, or a terra `SpatExtent`.

Read the full osmapiR trajectory →

forestly vs osmapiR: editorial side-by-side

F
forestly
ANALYTICS
0.0

forestly built an interactive safety review tool, then taught it to produce submission-ready RTF.

◆ Current state

forestly renders adverse-event forest plots as interactive reactable widgets — filterable by AE category, with sliders for incidence thresholds and a toggle for the risk-difference column. Version 0.1.3 added `rtf_static_forestly()` for static RTF output, and 0.1.4 has been about giving the display owner control over what reviewers see: the CSV download button, the AE filter label, and the diff toggle can each be switched off.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc runs from a fixed interactive widget toward a configurable one with two output modes. Nearly every new argument in the last two releases exists to remove something from the display or relabel it, which suggests the users driving development are producing outputs for others to review under conventions they do not control. The x-axis range, column header, figure header and slider range arguments point the same way — this is a tool being fitted into standardised reporting rather than used ad hoc.

◆ Prediction

Given that the last two releases have consisted almost entirely of display-control arguments, the next is likely more of the same, applied to whichever parts of the interactive layout are still fixed.

O
osmapiR
ANALYTICS
0.0

osmapiR is the rare API client that tracks its server's wiki revision numbers in the changelog.

◆ Current state

osmapiR wraps the full OpenStreetMap API from R — reading and writing map data, changesets, notes, GPX traces and user records — with OAuth2 where the endpoint requires it, pagination handled internally, and atomic calls vectorised. Recent releases have filled in the moderation and social surface: note subscription, user blocks, changeset discussion search. The newest release lets `bbox` arguments arrive as a character string, matrix, vector, an sf `bbox`, or a terra `SpatExtent`.

◆ Where it's heading

Four consecutive releases open with the same line — documentation and code updated for server-side changes, cited by OSM wiki revision range. That is a maintainer treating an evolving remote API as a versioned contract and auditing against it each cycle, which is unusual discipline and the main reason to trust this client over a hand-rolled wrapper. The second thread is fitting into R's spatial conventions rather than exposing OSM's, visible in the bbox coercion work and the httr2 upgrades landing with upstream help.

◆ Prediction

The pattern is stable enough to call: another release synchronised to the next OSM wiki revision range, adding whatever endpoints appeared and adjusting whatever changed shape.

Alternatives to forestly and osmapiR

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either forestly or osmapiR.

See all forestly alternatives → · See all osmapiR alternatives →

Recent activity from forestly and osmapiR

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 5mo agoforestlyDownload button, AE filter label and diff toggle become optional
  2. 5mo agoosmapiRbbox arguments accept sf and terra objects
  3. 11mo agoforestlyStatic RTF forest plots join the interactive output
  4. 0y agoosmapiRNote search defaults to creation order; JSON for GPX metadata
  5. 1y agoosmapiRNote subscriptions and user block endpoints added
  6. 1y agoforestlyreactR 0.6.0 rendering fix and slider label control
  7. 1y agoosmapiRChangeset queries gain from and to parameters
  8. 1y agoosmapiRJOSS citation added; single-tag conversion fixed
  9. 2y agoforestlyTreatment group selection and rough-edge fixes
  10. 2y agoosmapiRComplete OSM API coverage arrives in one release
  11. 3y agoforestlyFirst release on GitHub and CRAN

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between forestly and osmapiR?

Both compete on the same themes — r-language — within Analytics. forestly and osmapiR are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is forestly better than osmapiR?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. forestly and osmapiR are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to forestly?

Top forestly alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "forestly alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/forestly for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to osmapiR?

Top osmapiR alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "osmapiR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/osmapir for the full list with editorial commentary on each.