← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

forecasting vs rnpn

A side-by-side editorial comparison of forecasting and rnpn — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

forecasting vs rnpn: at a glance

Featureforecastingrnpn
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesforecasting, epidemiology, reproducibility, vignettesphenology, api-client, ecological-data, data-cleaning
Last editorial update7h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is forecasting?

HIDDA.forecasting is a book chapter's reproducibility artifact, not a package under development.

HIDDA.forecasting accompanies a book chapter on forecasting infectious disease counts; its vignettes reproduce the results presented there using arima, prophet, glarma, hhh4contacts and scoringRules. The 1.0.0 release states this outright — it is the version used for the chapter, pinned to CRAN package versions as of July 2018. Every release since has been a vignette rebuild against newer R and dependency versions.

Read the full forecasting trajectory →

What is rnpn?

The USA phenology data client rebuilt its entire stack and stopped handing users -9999 as a number.

rnpn is the R client for the USA National Phenology Network, retrieving observation records, phenometrics and gridded model layers. Version 1.3.0 in March 2025 replaced nearly all of its infrastructure at once — sp and raster dropped, terra made optional, XML swapped for xml2, plyr for dplyr, httr and curl for httr2 — and changed what functions return, with tibbles in place of data.tables and empty tibbles in place of NULL on error. The two releases since have completed the missing-value handling and restored performance lost in the transition.

Read the full rnpn trajectory →

forecasting vs rnpn: editorial side-by-side

F
forecasting
ANALYTICS
0.0

HIDDA.forecasting is a book chapter's reproducibility artifact, not a package under development.

◆ Current state

HIDDA.forecasting accompanies a book chapter on forecasting infectious disease counts; its vignettes reproduce the results presented there using arima, prophet, glarma, hhh4contacts and scoringRules. The 1.0.0 release states this outright — it is the version used for the chapter, pinned to CRAN package versions as of July 2018. Every release since has been a vignette rebuild against newer R and dependency versions.

◆ Where it's heading

The release pattern is maintenance on an eight-year cadence dictated entirely by the surrounding ecosystem: 1.1.1 rebuilt under R 4.0.4, 1.1.2 under R 4.3.2, 1.1.3 under R 4.6.1, each reporting whether the numbers moved. They mostly have not — the recurring note is minor numerical differences confined to the prophet forecasts in vignette('CHILI_prophet'). The only substantive change in the visible history is 1.1.0's methodological tidy-up of the scoring comparisons.

◆ Prediction

Nothing in these entries points to new functionality; the next release is most likely another vignette rebuild whenever a dependency change or a CRAN check failure forces one.

R
rnpn
ANALYTICS
0.0

The USA phenology data client rebuilt its entire stack and stopped handing users -9999 as a number.

◆ Current state

rnpn is the R client for the USA National Phenology Network, retrieving observation records, phenometrics and gridded model layers. Version 1.3.0 in March 2025 replaced nearly all of its infrastructure at once — sp and raster dropped, terra made optional, XML swapped for xml2, plyr for dplyr, httr and curl for httr2 — and changed what functions return, with tibbles in place of data.tables and empty tibbles in place of NULL on error. The two releases since have completed the missing-value handling and restored performance lost in the transition.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is being brought onto the current R stack and made honest about missing data, and those are the same project. Converting the -9999 sentinel to NA started in 1.3.0 for download functions and was extended to all columns in 1.4.1; the string "emptyvalue" got the same treatment. Beyond the migration, the feature additions are modest and specific to the domain, such as custom start and end dates for defining a phenometrics season.

◆ Prediction

With the dependency migration finished and sentinel handling now applied across all columns, the next releases most likely return to domain features and to fixes surfaced by the server side, which has already prompted work through migrations and backend moves. The removed progress indicator is an acknowledged regression that may come back.

Alternatives to forecasting and rnpn

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either forecasting or rnpn.

See all forecasting alternatives → · See all rnpn alternatives →

Recent activity from forecasting and rnpn

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoforecastingVignettes rebuilt under R 4.6.1
  2. 11mo agornpnSentinel -9999 now converted to NA across all columns
  3. 1y agornpnCustom season windows for phenometrics, and a speed regression fixed
  4. 1y agornpnDependency stack and return types replaced wholesale
  5. 1y agornpnBackfilled notes for seven earlier maintenance releases
  6. 2y agoforecastingVignettes rebuilt under R 4.3.2
  7. 5y agoforecastingVignettes rebuilt under R 4.0.4
  8. 7y agoforecastingStandard PIT and discretized log-normal scoring
  9. 7y agoforecastingThe version used for the book chapter, with pinned dependencies

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between forecasting and rnpn?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. forecasting and rnpn are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is forecasting better than rnpn?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. forecasting and rnpn are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to forecasting?

Top forecasting alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "forecasting alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/forecasting for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rnpn?

Top rnpn alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rnpn alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rnpn for the full list with editorial commentary on each.