datefixR
The messy-date parser rewrote its core in Rust and came out 300x faster.
Comparison · Analytics
fellingdater vs ggsurvfit
A side-by-side editorial comparison of fellingdater and ggsurvfit — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
fellingdater vs ggsurvfit: at a glance
What is fellingdater?
Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.
fellingdater estimates when a tree was felled from sapwood measurements, the core inference in dendrochronological dating of timber. Version 1.0.0 passed rOpenSci review with that scope, and the 2024 releases were mostly about the accompanying JOSS paper and user-supplied sapwood datasets. Version 1.2.0 changed the package's remit substantially, adding an entire trs_* family for tree-ring series handling: crossdating with multiple statistical measures, the Hollstein and Baillie-Pilcher t-value transformations, parallel variation percentages, synthetic series generation, and dated-series plotting.
What is ggsurvfit?
ggsurvfit is in correctness-and-compatibility mode, not feature mode.
The package draws survival and cumulative-incidence curves on a ggplot2 grammar, with risk tables, p-values and quantile annotations. Recent releases are entirely fixes and upstream tracking: ggplot2 v4.0.0 compatibility in 2025, and a 2026 patch correcting a Gray-test p-value that could be reported for the wrong competing event.
fellingdater vs ggsurvfit: editorial side-by-side
fellingdater
0.0ANALYTICS
Went from estimating felling dates to doing the crossdating that produces them.
◆ Current state
fellingdater estimates when a tree was felled from sapwood measurements, the core inference in dendrochronological dating of timber. Version 1.0.0 passed rOpenSci review with that scope, and the 2024 releases were mostly about the accompanying JOSS paper and user-supplied sapwood datasets. Version 1.2.0 changed the package's remit substantially, adding an entire trs_* family for tree-ring series handling: crossdating with multiple statistical measures, the Hollstein and Baillie-Pilcher t-value transformations, parallel variation percentages, synthetic series generation, and dated-series plotting.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has expanded backwards along the workflow. It began at the last step — given dated series, estimate the felling date — and 1.2.0 added the step before it, establishing those dates by crossdating in the first place. Version 1.2.1 is early polish on that new surface: axis control, non-syntactic column names, encoding safety in read_fh(). The direction is a single package covering the chain from raw ring widths to a felling-date estimate.
◆ Prediction
Expect the trs_* family to keep accumulating polish and additional crossdating statistics, since it is barely a year old and 1.2.1 was already fixing its plotting and top_n behaviour. Whether the two halves of the package get unified into one workflow interface is the open question the entries do not answer.
ggsurvfit
2.5ANALYTICS
ggsurvfit is in correctness-and-compatibility mode, not feature mode.
◆ Current state
The package draws survival and cumulative-incidence curves on a ggplot2 grammar, with risk tables, p-values and quantile annotations. Recent releases are entirely fixes and upstream tracking: ggplot2 v4.0.0 compatibility in 2025, and a 2026 patch correcting a Gray-test p-value that could be reported for the wrong competing event.
◆ Where it's heading
The feature surface settled around 1.0.0, when risk-table alignment was exported and colour and linetype defaults became configurable. Since then the work is keeping pace with survival, ggplot2 and tidycmprsk changes, and closing cases where the plotted curve and the annotation disagreed — the p-value matched by position rather than name, confidence limits swapped for multi-state models, quantiles read off a plateau.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release to track upstream survival or ggplot2 changes rather than add plotting features; the CDISC censoring convention adopted in Surv_CNSR() suggests further alignment with clinical data standards is the likelier direction.
Alternatives to fellingdater and ggsurvfit
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fellingdater or ggsurvfit.
maplegend
The legend engine mapsf spun out, now covering legend types the parent map package can draw.
lang
R help pages translated on demand by whichever LLM you point it at.
mapsf
Thematic mapping in base R that finally got a theming system, then spent two years polishing legends.
qualtRics
qualtRics moved its contact functions onto XM Directory days before the old endpoints died.
fabletools
The tidyverts forecasting core rebuilt model combination on full residual covariance.
See all fellingdater alternatives → · See all ggsurvfit alternatives →
Recent activity from fellingdater and ggsurvfit
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 20d agoggsurvfitGray-test p-values matched to the plotted outcome by name
- 4mo agofellingdaterPolish for the crossdating plots and file reader
- 10mo agoggsurvfitggplot2 v4.0.0 compatibility and multi-state CI label fix
- 1y agofellingdaterAdds a full crossdating and tree-ring analysis toolkit ⚡
- 1y agofellingdaterUser-supplied sapwood data works across all functions
- 1y agofellingdaterFixes fd_report() with user-defined sapwood files
- 2y agofellingdaterJOSS paper accepted; citation updated
- 2y agofellingdaterAdds a workflow vignette ahead of JOSS submission
- 2y agoggsurvfitNegative follow-up times and a cloglog transformation
- 2y agoggsurvfitAesthetic defaults become switchable and alignment is exported
- 2y agoggsurvfitConfidence limits corrected for monotonicity-reversing transforms
- 3y agoggsurvfitGlue syntax in risk tables and coxph model support
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between fellingdater and ggsurvfit?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ggsurvfit is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is fellingdater better than ggsurvfit?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ggsurvfit is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to fellingdater?
Top fellingdater alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fellingdater alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fellingdater for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to ggsurvfit?
Top ggsurvfit alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggsurvfit alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggsurvfit for the full list with editorial commentary on each.