← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

ggsurvfit vs mapsf

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ggsurvfit and mapsf — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

ggsurvfit vs mapsf: at a glance

Featureggsurvfitmapsf
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessurvival-analysis, ggplot2, competing-risks, clinical-plotscartography, thematic-maps, spatial, base-graphics
Last editorial update3h ago59m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ggsurvfit?

ggsurvfit is in correctness-and-compatibility mode, not feature mode.

The package draws survival and cumulative-incidence curves on a ggplot2 grammar, with risk tables, p-values and quantile annotations. Recent releases are entirely fixes and upstream tracking: ggplot2 v4.0.0 compatibility in 2025, and a 2026 patch correcting a Gray-test p-value that could be reported for the wrong competing event.

Read the full ggsurvfit trajectory →

What is mapsf?

Thematic mapping in base R that finally got a theming system, then spent two years polishing legends.

mapsf produces thematic maps on R's base graphics device — choropleths, proportional symbols, typology maps, rasters, and their combinations, with legends, scale bars, north arrows, and insets as composable elements. Version 1.0.0 was the structural release, introducing a theming system that deprecated eight scattered styling arguments and adding mf_png() and mf_svg() export helpers plus alpha transparency across map types. The 1.1.x and 1.2.x line since then has been steady refinement: background and extent control on the drawing functions, decimal and thousands-separator control in legends, and label placement arguments.

Read the full mapsf trajectory →

ggsurvfit vs mapsf: editorial side-by-side

G
ggsurvfit
ANALYTICS
2.5

ggsurvfit is in correctness-and-compatibility mode, not feature mode.

◆ Current state

The package draws survival and cumulative-incidence curves on a ggplot2 grammar, with risk tables, p-values and quantile annotations. Recent releases are entirely fixes and upstream tracking: ggplot2 v4.0.0 compatibility in 2025, and a 2026 patch correcting a Gray-test p-value that could be reported for the wrong competing event.

◆ Where it's heading

The feature surface settled around 1.0.0, when risk-table alignment was exported and colour and linetype defaults became configurable. Since then the work is keeping pace with survival, ggplot2 and tidycmprsk changes, and closing cases where the plotted curve and the annotation disagreed — the p-value matched by position rather than name, confidence limits swapped for multi-state models, quantiles read off a plateau.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to track upstream survival or ggplot2 changes rather than add plotting features; the CDISC censoring convention adopted in Surv_CNSR() suggests further alignment with clinical data standards is the likelier direction.

M
mapsf
ANALYTICS
0.0

Thematic mapping in base R that finally got a theming system, then spent two years polishing legends.

◆ Current state

mapsf produces thematic maps on R's base graphics device — choropleths, proportional symbols, typology maps, rasters, and their combinations, with legends, scale bars, north arrows, and insets as composable elements. Version 1.0.0 was the structural release, introducing a theming system that deprecated eight scattered styling arguments and adding mf_png() and mf_svg() export helpers plus alpha transparency across map types. The 1.1.x and 1.2.x line since then has been steady refinement: background and extent control on the drawing functions, decimal and thousands-separator control in legends, and label placement arguments.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has been consolidating control into fewer, more consistent places. Legend handling moved out to the maplegend package in 0.8.0 and the per-element mf_legend_* functions were deprecated in favor of arguments on the map calls themselves; theming replaced ad-hoc style arguments in 1.0.0; and recent releases keep propagating the same argument vocabulary — bg, extent, leg_val_rnd, leg_val_dec, leg_val_big — across every function that should accept it. Determinism is a visible concern too, with 1.2.1 fixing a seed so mf_distr() point positions stop moving between runs.

◆ Prediction

The recent releases are almost entirely argument-parity work across existing functions, so expect that to continue until the vocabulary is uniform rather than any new map type appearing.

Alternatives to ggsurvfit and mapsf

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ggsurvfit or mapsf.

See all ggsurvfit alternatives → · See all mapsf alternatives →

Recent activity from ggsurvfit and mapsf

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 20d agoggsurvfitGray-test p-values matched to the plotted outcome by name
  2. 1mo agomapsfLabel placement arguments and deterministic distribution plots
  3. 2mo agomapsfBackground and extent control across the drawing functions
  4. 7mo agomapsfPNG resolution control and legend number formatting
  5. 10mo agoggsurvfitggplot2 v4.0.0 compatibility and multi-state CI label fix
  6. 1y agomapsf1.0.0 introduces theming and deprecates eight style arguments
  7. 1y agomapsfPencil-sketch layers, ckmeans breaks, and border extraction
  8. 2y agomapsfGraticule label display fix
  9. 2y agoggsurvfitNegative follow-up times and a cloglog transformation
  10. 2y agoggsurvfitAesthetic defaults become switchable and alignment is exported
  11. 2y agoggsurvfitConfidence limits corrected for monotonicity-reversing transforms
  12. 3y agoggsurvfitGlue syntax in risk tables and coxph model support

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ggsurvfit and mapsf?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ggsurvfit is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ggsurvfit better than mapsf?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ggsurvfit is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ggsurvfit?

Top ggsurvfit alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ggsurvfit alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ggsurvfit for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to mapsf?

Top mapsf alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mapsf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mapsf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.