ggpointless
ggpointless keeps adding the ggplot2 layers nobody else bothered to write.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
fastpos vs Tailscale
A side-by-side editorial comparison of fastpos and Tailscale — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
fastpos vs Tailscale: at a glance
| Feature | fastpos | Tailscale |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Infra & APIs | Infra & APIs |
| Velocity score | 0.0 | 6.3 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 0 |
| Top themes | simulation, correlation, sample-size, rcpp | networking, scale, api, kubernetes |
| Last editorial update | 19h ago | 4h ago |
| Website | Visit → | — |
What is fastpos?
Dormant three years, then a two-line release nobody using it would notice
fastpos finds the critical point of stability for a Pearson correlation, a simulation problem whose C++ implementation is the entire reason the package exists. Its substantive work concluded in 2022 with 0.5.0, the release prepared during R Journal review, which renamed the precision parameters, moved multicore work to pbapply and let users set corridor limits directly. After three years of silence, 0.6.0 removes an internal restriction to cpp11 and changes index_pop to an integer.
What is Tailscale?
Tailscale is paying down scale in two dimensions: nodes per tailnet, tailnets per org.
Three threads run through this window. The tailnet management API is the newest: creation landed in alpha in late July, and the list endpoint now paginates at 100 results with limit and cursor parameters. The client releases are patch-grade but weighted toward scale — v1.102.1 made node additions and removals constant-time, and v1.102.3 fixes Tailnet Lock startup failures on large tailnets while cutting memory use on iOS and tvOS. The Kubernetes operator runs on its own track, adding in-cluster PeerRelays, workload identity federation and IPv6 egress.
fastpos vs Tailscale: editorial side-by-side
fastpos
0.0INFRA · APIS
Dormant three years, then a two-line release nobody using it would notice
◆ Current state
fastpos finds the critical point of stability for a Pearson correlation, a simulation problem whose C++ implementation is the entire reason the package exists. Its substantive work concluded in 2022 with 0.5.0, the release prepared during R Journal review, which renamed the precision parameters, moved multicore work to pbapply and let users set corridor limits directly. After three years of silence, 0.6.0 removes an internal restriction to cpp11 and changes index_pop to an integer.
◆ Where it's heading
This is a finished piece of research software in low-effort upkeep. The changelog's centre of gravity is the R Journal review process, and once that concluded the package stopped changing. The single release since is toolchain work of the kind that keeps a package compiling rather than anything a user would see.
◆ Prediction
Expect nothing beyond occasional compilation or CRAN-check fixes unless the accompanying paper draws requests for other correlation types or resampling schemes.
Tailscale
6.3INFRA · APIS
Tailscale is paying down scale in two dimensions: nodes per tailnet, tailnets per org.
◆ Current state
Three threads run through this window. The tailnet management API is the newest: creation landed in alpha in late July, and the list endpoint now paginates at 100 results with limit and cursor parameters. The client releases are patch-grade but weighted toward scale — v1.102.1 made node additions and removals constant-time, and v1.102.3 fixes Tailnet Lock startup failures on large tailnets while cutting memory use on iOS and tvOS. The Kubernetes operator runs on its own track, adding in-cluster PeerRelays, workload identity federation and IPv6 egress.
◆ Where it's heading
The qualifier that keeps recurring is “large”: tailnets big enough to break Tailnet Lock at startup, node churn that pinned CPU, mobile clients running short of memory, and organizations holding more than a hundred tailnets. Tailscale is absorbing the cost of customers who outgrew the shape the product originally assumed, in two directions at once — nodes inside a tailnet, and tailnets inside an organization. The second is the more consequential, because allocating a tailnet per customer or per environment is a different product than a company network. Security work stays continuous alongside it, with TS-2026-011 closed here and a run of SSH and Serve advisories backported the month before.
◆ Prediction
The tailnet creation API should leave alpha carrying the same limit-and-cursor contract just applied to the list endpoint, with further startup and memory work aimed at large tailnets on the client side.
Alternatives to fastpos and Tailscale
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fastpos or Tailscale.
mpactr
mpactr spent two spring releases normalizing case in metadata after users kept tripping on it.
surveytidy
surveytidy taught every dplyr verb to operate on a whole collection of surveys at once.
surveycore
surveycore declared its API stable with every survey design type covered.
PEIMAN2
PEIMAN2 cut its annotation database loose from its release cycle without breaking CRAN.
prospectr
prospectr spent its biggest release in years fixing spectra it had been quietly mangling.
See all fastpos alternatives → · See all Tailscale alternatives →
Recent activity from fastpos and Tailscale
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1d agoTailscalev1.102.3 patches a 4via6 routing flaw and large-tailnet startups
- 2d agoTailscaleTailnet list API pagination
- 9d agoTailscaleOperator adds in-cluster PeerRelays and workload identity federation
- 13d agoTailscaleContainer image v1.102.2: library updates only
- 16d agoTailscalev1.102.2 fixes a Funnel incoming-connection regression
- 17d agoTailscalev1.102.1 adds Services CLI and constant-time node churn
- 10mo agofastposcpp11 restriction removed; index_pop now an integer
- 4y agofastposMulticore fix for pbmcapply; Windows limited to one core
- 4y agofastposR Journal review release: renamed precision parameters, manual corridor limits
- 5y agofastposMore informative test failures; interactive-only progress bars
- 6y agofastposMulticore support via the future package
- 6y agofastposExact-rho population generation and C++ progress bar fixes
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between fastpos and Tailscale?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Tailscale is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is fastpos better than Tailscale?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Tailscale is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to fastpos?
Top fastpos alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fastpos alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fastpos for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Tailscale?
Top Tailscale alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Tailscale alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tailscale for the full list with editorial commentary on each.