← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

fastpos vs prospectr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of fastpos and prospectr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

fastpos vs prospectr: at a glance

Featurefastposprospectr
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessimulation, correlation, sample-size, rcppspectroscopy, signal-processing, preprocessing, calibration-sampling
Last editorial update20h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is fastpos?

Dormant three years, then a two-line release nobody using it would notice

fastpos finds the critical point of stability for a Pearson correlation, a simulation problem whose C++ implementation is the entire reason the package exists. Its substantive work concluded in 2022 with 0.5.0, the release prepared during R Journal review, which renamed the precision parameters, moved multicore work to pbapply and let users set corridor limits directly. After three years of silence, 0.6.0 removes an internal restriction to cpp11 and changes index_pop to an integer.

Read the full fastpos trajectory →

What is prospectr?

prospectr spent its biggest release in years fixing spectra it had been quietly mangling.

prospectr provides the signal-processing layer for near-infrared and visible spectroscopy in R — Savitzky-Golay and gap-segment derivatives, standard normal variate, detrending, continuum removal, splice correction, plus calibration sampling algorithms like Kennard-Stone and DUPLEX and readers for ASD and BUCHI NIRCal instrument files. The May release is the substantial one: a long list of corrections to functions that were returning wrong or missing values rather than failing.

Read the full prospectr trajectory →

fastpos vs prospectr: editorial side-by-side

F
fastpos
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Dormant three years, then a two-line release nobody using it would notice

◆ Current state

fastpos finds the critical point of stability for a Pearson correlation, a simulation problem whose C++ implementation is the entire reason the package exists. Its substantive work concluded in 2022 with 0.5.0, the release prepared during R Journal review, which renamed the precision parameters, moved multicore work to pbapply and let users set corridor limits directly. After three years of silence, 0.6.0 removes an internal restriction to cpp11 and changes index_pop to an integer.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a finished piece of research software in low-effort upkeep. The changelog's centre of gravity is the R Journal review process, and once that concluded the package stopped changing. The single release since is toolchain work of the kind that keeps a package compiling rather than anything a user would see.

◆ Prediction

Expect nothing beyond occasional compilation or CRAN-check fixes unless the accompanying paper draws requests for other correlation types or resampling schemes.

P
prospectr
INFRA · APIS
0.0

prospectr spent its biggest release in years fixing spectra it had been quietly mangling.

◆ Current state

prospectr provides the signal-processing layer for near-infrared and visible spectroscopy in R — Savitzky-Golay and gap-segment derivatives, standard normal variate, detrending, continuum removal, splice correction, plus calibration sampling algorithms like Kennard-Stone and DUPLEX and readers for ASD and BUCHI NIRCal instrument files. The May release is the substantial one: a long list of corrections to functions that were returning wrong or missing values rather than failing.

◆ Where it's heading

The recent work is corrective rather than additive, and several items changed results silently before being caught. continuumRemoval() derived its convex-hull boundary offset from a fixed one-wavelength assumption that broke for fine-resolution spectra or non-nanometre units; cochranTest() passed an invalid argument name to prcomp() and produced incorrect principal component scores; readASD() silently dropped spectra in one branch of its text path. Two file readers were leaking connections. Alongside that runs a smaller thread of decoupling preprocessing steps from each other, most visibly detrend() gaining an snv argument so polynomial detrending can run without the SNV transform that Barnes et al. bundled with it.

◆ Prediction

The detrend() decoupling is the only recent addition and it fits a broader pipeline-composition direction, so similar separation of other bundled preprocessing steps is the plausible next move. The misspelled substraction argument now carries a deprecation warning, which schedules its removal for a future release.

Alternatives to fastpos and prospectr

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fastpos or prospectr.

See all fastpos alternatives → · See all prospectr alternatives →

Recent activity from fastpos and prospectr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoprospectrdetrend() can run without a prior SNV transformation
  2. 2mo agoprospectrContinuum removal, SNV and cochranTest corrected; readers stop leaking
  3. 10mo agofastposcpp11 restriction removed; index_pop now an integer
  4. 1y agoprospectrread_nircal() sample ID field fix
  5. 3y agoprospectrNon-UTF8 sample IDs no longer become NA
  6. 4y agofastposMulticore fix for pbmcapply; Windows limited to one core
  7. 4y agofastposR Journal review release: renamed precision parameters, manual corridor limits
  8. 4y agoprospectrkenStone() bug fix
  9. 4y agoprospectrread_nircal() execution failure fixed
  10. 5y agofastposMore informative test failures; interactive-only progress bars
  11. 6y agofastposMulticore support via the future package
  12. 6y agofastposExact-rho population generation and C++ progress bar fixes

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between fastpos and prospectr?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. fastpos and prospectr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is fastpos better than prospectr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fastpos and prospectr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to fastpos?

Top fastpos alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fastpos alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fastpos for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to prospectr?

Top prospectr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "prospectr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/prospectr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.