← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

fastplyr vs spmodel

A side-by-side editorial comparison of fastplyr and spmodel — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

fastplyr vs spmodel: at a glance

Featurefastplyrspmodel
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesdataframe-performance, dplyr-alternative, query-optimization, cran-policyspatial-statistics, regression-modelling, kriging, r-package
Last editorial update44m ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is fastplyr?

A fast dplyr stand-in that keeps finding new places to skip work entirely.

fastplyr reimplements the dplyr verbs on a faster backend, exposing f_summarise, f_mutate, f_reframe and a set of group metadata helpers alongside optimized joins and quantiles. The most recent release removes non-API C functions and raises the floor to R 4.5.0, a steep requirement that follows the C++17 requirement introduced a release earlier. The verb surface itself has been stable since 0.9.0.

Read the full fastplyr trajectory →

What is spmodel?

Spatial regression in R, adding block kriging and then tuning the numerics underneath it

spmodel fits spatial linear and generalised linear models, for both point-referenced and areal data, with prediction and diagnostics attached. Block prediction arrived in 0.11.0 and the releases since have refined it. The most recent release changes optimiser behaviour: the default Nelder-Mead relative stopping tolerance tightens from 1e-4 to 1e-6 to reduce convergence on local rather than global maxima.

Read the full spmodel trajectory →

fastplyr vs spmodel: editorial side-by-side

F
fastplyr
ANALYTICS
0.0

A fast dplyr stand-in that keeps finding new places to skip work entirely.

◆ Current state

fastplyr reimplements the dplyr verbs on a faster backend, exposing f_summarise, f_mutate, f_reframe and a set of group metadata helpers alongside optimized joins and quantiles. The most recent release removes non-API C functions and raises the floor to R 4.5.0, a steep requirement that follows the C++17 requirement introduced a release earlier. The verb surface itself has been stable since 0.9.0.

◆ Where it's heading

The optimization strategy has shifted from making individual functions fast to reasoning about expressions before evaluating them — 0.9.9 began marking simple operators as group-unaware so expressions built only from them are evaluated across the whole data frame rather than per group. That is a structural bet: the package increasingly inspects what you wrote to decide how much work is actually needed. Running alongside it is a steady tightening of build requirements, with C++17, R 4.5.0 and CRAN's C API rules all landing within a year.

◆ Prediction

Expect the group-unaware classification to widen to more functions, since each addition compounds across every grouped expression, and expect the dependency floors to keep rising as the package tracks CRAN's compiled-code policy.

S
spmodel
ANALYTICS
0.0

Spatial regression in R, adding block kriging and then tuning the numerics underneath it

◆ Current state

spmodel fits spatial linear and generalised linear models, for both point-referenced and areal data, with prediction and diagnostics attached. Block prediction arrived in 0.11.0 and the releases since have refined it. The most recent release changes optimiser behaviour: the default Nelder-Mead relative stopping tolerance tightens from 1e-4 to 1e-6 to reduce convergence on local rather than global maxima.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run in parallel. The first is expanding what can be predicted — point predictions, then areal averages over a region via block kriging, then better accuracy and efficiency for that path as the block size default moved from 1000 to 4000 in 0.12.0. The second is numerical trustworthiness, and it is unusually prominent here: a range-constraint option for stability in 0.9.0, a corrected log determinant of the fixed effects in the restricted log likelihood in 0.11.0, a cloud semivariogram that had been doubling the semivariance fixed in 0.11.1, and now a tighter optimiser tolerance. Several of these silently changed results before they were caught.

◆ Prediction

Expect the maintainers to keep publishing explicit reproduction instructions alongside numerical default changes, as 0.13.0 does by documenting the `control = list(reltol = 1e-4)` escape hatch. The entries give no signal of expansion beyond the current model families.

Alternatives to fastplyr and spmodel

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fastplyr or spmodel.

See all fastplyr alternatives → · See all spmodel alternatives →

Recent activity from fastplyr and spmodel

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agospmodelTighter optimiser tolerance to avoid local maxima
  2. 4mo agofastplyrNon-API C functions dropped, R 4.5.0 now required
  3. 6mo agospmodelEmpirical autocovariance function and better block kriging accuracy
  4. 8mo agofastplyrIn-place sorting arrives with a C++17 requirement
  5. 9mo agospmodelCloud semivariogram doubling fixed; geometry warnings added
  6. 10mo agofastplyrGroup-unaware expressions evaluated on the whole frame
  7. 1y agospmodelBlock kriging for areal averages and their uncertainty
  8. 1y agofastplyrf_mutate and f_reframe complete the verb set
  9. 1y agospmodelRobust semivariogram and new covariance types for areal models
  10. 1y agofastplyrDynamic argument evaluation and f_pull
  11. 1y agofastplyrf_fill added and grouped joins repaired
  12. 1y agospmodelRange constraint option and redefined covariance type names

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between fastplyr and spmodel?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. fastplyr and spmodel are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is fastplyr better than spmodel?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fastplyr and spmodel are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to fastplyr?

Top fastplyr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fastplyr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fastplyr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to spmodel?

Top spmodel alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spmodel alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spmodel for the full list with editorial commentary on each.