n2kanalysis
n2kanalysis has spent eight years wiring INLA models to an S3 bucket.
Comparison · Analytics
fastplyr vs ichimoku
A side-by-side editorial comparison of fastplyr and ichimoku — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
fastplyr vs ichimoku: at a glance
What is fastplyr?
A fast dplyr stand-in that keeps finding new places to skip work entirely.
fastplyr reimplements the dplyr verbs on a faster backend, exposing f_summarise, f_mutate, f_reframe and a set of group metadata helpers alongside optimized joins and quantiles. The most recent release removes non-API C functions and raises the floor to R 4.5.0, a steep requirement that follows the C++17 requirement introduced a release earlier. The verb surface itself has been stable since 0.9.0.
What is ichimoku?
A cloud-chart package quietly swapping its dependencies for its maintainer's own libraries.
ichimoku implements Ichimoku Kinko Hyo cloud charts, strategy backtesting and an OANDA data interface for R. Recent releases are almost entirely plumbing: 1.5.7 drops RcppSimdJson in favor of secretbase for JSON parsing, following earlier releases that moved hashing to secretbase and raised the nanonext and mirai floors. The charting and strategy surface has been stable since the 1.5.0 line.
fastplyr vs ichimoku: editorial side-by-side
fastplyr
0.0ANALYTICS
A fast dplyr stand-in that keeps finding new places to skip work entirely.
◆ Current state
fastplyr reimplements the dplyr verbs on a faster backend, exposing f_summarise, f_mutate, f_reframe and a set of group metadata helpers alongside optimized joins and quantiles. The most recent release removes non-API C functions and raises the floor to R 4.5.0, a steep requirement that follows the C++17 requirement introduced a release earlier. The verb surface itself has been stable since 0.9.0.
◆ Where it's heading
The optimization strategy has shifted from making individual functions fast to reasoning about expressions before evaluating them — 0.9.9 began marking simple operators as group-unaware so expressions built only from them are evaluated across the whole data frame rather than per group. That is a structural bet: the package increasingly inspects what you wrote to decide how much work is actually needed. Running alongside it is a steady tightening of build requirements, with C++17, R 4.5.0 and CRAN's C API rules all landing within a year.
◆ Prediction
Expect the group-unaware classification to widen to more functions, since each addition compounds across every grouped expression, and expect the dependency floors to keep rising as the package tracks CRAN's compiled-code policy.
ichimoku
0.0ANALYTICS
A cloud-chart package quietly swapping its dependencies for its maintainer's own libraries.
◆ Current state
ichimoku implements Ichimoku Kinko Hyo cloud charts, strategy backtesting and an OANDA data interface for R. Recent releases are almost entirely plumbing: 1.5.7 drops RcppSimdJson in favor of secretbase for JSON parsing, following earlier releases that moved hashing to secretbase and raised the nanonext and mirai floors. The charting and strategy surface has been stable since the 1.5.0 line.
◆ Where it's heading
The visible arc is consolidation onto the maintainer's own package family — secretbase for hashing and now JSON, nanonext and mirai for concurrency — which steadily removes third-party and Rcpp-based dependencies from the install chain. Feature work is sporadic and narrow when it comes: a faster POSIXct formatter exported as a utility, a multi-session option for the Shiny app, and a fix for asymmetric strategies that failed to emit a final entry signal.
◆ Prediction
Expect further dependency consolidation as the sibling packages gain capabilities, with ichimoku adopting them shortly after release rather than shipping new charting features.
Alternatives to fastplyr and ichimoku
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fastplyr or ichimoku.
n1qn1c
A Fortran-descended optimizer got thread-safe, then found two flags that never worked.
ggstatsplot
ggstatsplot reached 1.0 by adding tests, having outsourced its statistics years ago.
collapse
collapse got a JSS paper and a 7x fmean speedup in the same release.
gtsummary
gtsummary is quietly rebuilding itself around analysis results data, one table verb at a time.
broadcast
broadcast is filling in NumPy-style array broadcasting for R, operator by operator.
See all fastplyr alternatives → · See all ichimoku alternatives →
Recent activity from fastplyr and ichimoku
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2mo agoichimokuJSON parsing moves from RcppSimdJson to secretbase
- 4mo agofastplyrNon-API C functions dropped, R 4.5.0 now required
- 8mo agofastplyrIn-place sorting arrives with a C++17 requirement
- 10mo agofastplyrGroup-unaware expressions evaluated on the whole frame
- 1y agofastplyrf_mutate and f_reframe complete the verb set
- 1y agoichimokuFaster POSIXct formatting exported as a utility
- 1y agofastplyrDynamic argument evaluation and f_pull
- 1y agofastplyrf_fill added and grouped joins repaired
- 1y agoichimokuMultiple concurrent sessions in the OANDA Shiny app
- 1y agoichimokuAsymmetric strategies now emit their final entry signal
- 2y agoichimokusecretbase floor raised to 1.0.0
- 2y agoichimokuArchive verification reverts to SHA256
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between fastplyr and ichimoku?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. fastplyr and ichimoku are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is fastplyr better than ichimoku?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fastplyr and ichimoku are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to fastplyr?
Top fastplyr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fastplyr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fastplyr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to ichimoku?
Top ichimoku alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ichimoku alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ichimoku for the full list with editorial commentary on each.